Historians on Donald Trump: PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH!

[JimH52]

Here's Why Donald Trump Is Horrifying, According To Historians

This is the most eye opening oratory on Donald Trump, that I have ever seen!

 

[Zoom-boing]

"A group of historians whose life’s work has consisted of studying the men, women and events that shaped America have banded together to speak out against Donald Trump."

Trump hasn't done anything yet. How the hell can they judge how he has 'shaped' America?

This is just like giving obutthead a nobel prize before he'd done anything. How'd that work out?

Nobel secretary regrets Obama peace prize - BBC News

 

[Bob Blaylock]

"A group of historians whose life’s work has consisted of studying the men, women and events that shaped America have banded together to speak out against Donald Trump."

Trump hasn't done anything yet. How the hell can they judge how he has 'shaped' America?

When I saw the thread title, I was thinking almost exactly the same thing.

If Mr. Trump is elected President, then many, many years from now, historians will have a basis to speak of him and what impact he has had. But it is rather premature for them to speak of him now.

 

[JimH52]

You people are clueless. They base their judgement on his rhetoric and proposed policies, many if which are unconstitutional.

You either learn from History or you die from Ignorance.

 

[Zoom-boing]

You people are clueless. They base their judgement on his rhetoric and proposed policies, many if which are unconstitutional.

You either learn from History or you die from Ignorance.

They're basing it on his rhetoric and proposed policies? What he stated yesterday, today, or tomorrow? cause they change pretty rapidly, donchaknow.

Point is, he hasn't done anything yet. Saying isn't doing, they can only judge him after the fact.

 

[irosie91]

SO? the alternatives are-----hilldegard and burnsie

 

[Bob Blaylock]

You people are clueless. They base their judgement on his rhetoric and proposed policies, many if which are unconstitutional.

And Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders are any better, in what way?

 

[JimH52]

You people are clueless. They base their judgement on his rhetoric and proposed policies, many if which are unconstitutional.

You either learn from History or you die from Ignorance.

They're basing it on his rhetoric and proposed policies? What he stated yesterday, today, or tomorrow? cause they change pretty rapidly, donchaknow.

Point is, he hasn't done anything yet. Saying isn't doing, they can only judge him after the fact.

They do change, which should point out to everyone how unreliable and unstable he is. Your point is well taken.

 

[JimH52]

Historians have spoken...

 

[Zoom-boing]

You people are clueless. They base their judgement on his rhetoric and proposed policies, many if which are unconstitutional.

You either learn from History or you die from Ignorance.

They're basing it on his rhetoric and proposed policies? What he stated yesterday, today, or tomorrow? cause they change pretty rapidly, donchaknow.

Point is, he hasn't done anything yet. Saying isn't doing, they can only judge him after the fact.

They do change, which should point out to everyone how unreliable and unstable he is. Your point is well taken.

Wait ... so if a candidate ... or president ... changes their stance that means they are unreliable and/or unstable?? Huh, I thought the meme was that they evolved. Oh wait, that's only when a Dem does it.

His consistent message that has not changed .... secure the border, fight islamic terrorism, bring jobs back to the U.S.

Our choices this time around are a Dem posing as a Rep or a progressive who will be the continuation of obama.

We're screwed either way.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Historians have spoken...

 

[JimH52]

Historians have spoken...

Ignorance must be blissful for you...

 

[martybegan]

Historians have spoken...

What a freaking lemming you are. Always looking for others to help form your opinions.