Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.Rusty Houser was a law abiding gun owner his entire life.Everyone who walks into the park should be handed a gun and free access to ammunition at stations located all over the park. Because that would make everybody safer right?
Well...it wouldn't make them less safe...."Gun Free Zones" actually make them less safe....and keep in mind, there were thousands of people at the 2014 NRA convention in Tennessee, and they were allowed to carry concealed guns into the conference center with them.....any problems there.....? No.
See, what you anti gun extremists nuts don't realize....law abiding gun owners aren't shooting people.......so letting them carry guns isn't a problem........the criminals and the crazies....can't own or carry guns legally right now.....and they are the ones actually using illegal guns to shoot people.......
Anyways, someone might carry explosives into Disney. Every tourist should be handed a set of hand grenades. It wouldn't make them less safe, of course.
Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.Rusty Houser was a law abiding gun owner his entire life.Everyone who walks into the park should be handed a gun and free access to ammunition at stations located all over the park. Because that would make everybody safer right?Cruising through the internet sites I came across this topic. A good point is made.....
Does anything say "America" quite like Disney?
Random Thoughts About Disarmed Disney World - The Truth About Guns
Upon entering Disney’s Hollywood Studio, “Joe” searched my backpack. There were three pockets in the front of the pack and several on either side. Joe didn’t open any of the pockets to examine any of their contents. Not good. This time of year the Disney entertainment industrial complex is wall-to-wall with shvitzing tourists, jammed in a huge confusing space with multiple choke points and no clearly marked exits. If a terrorist somehow smuggled explosives or firearms into the House of the Mouse and attacked Walt’s “guests” it would be a very bad thing indeed. Saying that . . .
I’m sure the Disney complex is under constant video surveillance, and that the people discreetly monitoring Disney’s customers know exactly what to look for in terms of lethal threats. (Disney’s staff training is generally superb.) I’d like to believe that the Disney Corporation has armed, highly trained security guards – hopefully including its own SWAT team – ready to emerge from the park’s underground tunnels and hidden bunkers to take care of business, should worst come to worst. Still, I don’t think it’s enough.
Ideally, Disney’s guests should have to go through the same security procedures that airline passengers endure before they board their flights: ID checks, metal and explosives detectors and x-ray bag exams. The park should also have clearly marked exits and posted evacuation routes. Easily identifiable security guards should patrol the park, as both a deterrent and a go-to resource for tourists who see something suspicious. The guards should be openly armed.
Well...it wouldn't make them less safe...."Gun Free Zones" actually make them less safe....and keep in mind, there were thousands of people at the 2014 NRA convention in Tennessee, and they were allowed to carry concealed guns into the conference center with them.....any problems there.....? No.
See, what you anti gun extremists nuts don't realize....law abiding gun owners aren't shooting people.......so letting them carry guns isn't a problem........the criminals and the crazies....can't own or carry guns legally right now.....and they are the ones actually using illegal guns to shoot people.......
Anyways, someone might carry explosives into Disney. Every tourist should be handed a set of hand grenades. It wouldn't make them less safe, of course.
He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.Rusty Houser was a law abiding gun owner his entire life.Well...it wouldn't make them less safe...."Gun Free Zones" actually make them less safe....and keep in mind, there were thousands of people at the 2014 NRA convention in Tennessee, and they were allowed to carry concealed guns into the conference center with them.....any problems there.....? No.
See, what you anti gun extremists nuts don't realize....law abiding gun owners aren't shooting people.......so letting them carry guns isn't a problem........the criminals and the crazies....can't own or carry guns legally right now.....and they are the ones actually using illegal guns to shoot people.......
Anyways, someone might carry explosives into Disney. Every tourist should be handed a set of hand grenades. It wouldn't make them less safe, of course.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
No, still you. He was involuntarily committed, his wife was terrified of him....he had many brushes with the law.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.Rusty Houser was a law abiding gun owner his entire life.Well...it wouldn't make them less safe...."Gun Free Zones" actually make them less safe....and keep in mind, there were thousands of people at the 2014 NRA convention in Tennessee, and they were allowed to carry concealed guns into the conference center with them.....any problems there.....? No.
See, what you anti gun extremists nuts don't realize....law abiding gun owners aren't shooting people.......so letting them carry guns isn't a problem........the criminals and the crazies....can't own or carry guns legally right now.....and they are the ones actually using illegal guns to shoot people.......
Anyways, someone might carry explosives into Disney. Every tourist should be handed a set of hand grenades. It wouldn't make them less safe, of course.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Would be great a white christian free disneyland!
Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.Rusty Houser was a law abiding gun owner his entire life.
Anyways, someone might carry explosives into Disney. Every tourist should be handed a set of hand grenades. It wouldn't make them less safe, of course.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
It proves that you can't create a new law or restriction that would have prevented this.Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.No he wasn't, you lying sack. He had multiple scrapes with the law...including arson. And he couldn't get a gun legally.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
Would be great a white christian free disneyland!
In the eyes of the gun store that sold Houser the gun, he was a law abiding citizen. God knows how many other "law abiding citizens" they've sold guns to.It proves that you can't create a new law or restriction that would have prevented this.Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?Except for the gun he bought legally. You lying sack.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
All you can do is make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to buy a gun
So he lied. Go figure, criminals aren't truthful.In the eyes of the gun store that sold Houser the gun, he was a law abiding citizen. God knows how many other "law abiding citizens" they've sold guns to.It proves that you can't create a new law or restriction that would have prevented this.Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.Arson, domestic violence, theft, trespassing....who's lying?
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
All you can do is make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to buy a gun
Good, then we can have our guns...God, you guys must live your lives in a state of constant fear.
You're thousands of times more likely to be murdered by a family member than be a victim of an act of "terror" in the US.
How much freedom are you guys willing to give up for your false sense of security?
So how long have you been a criminal?So he lied. Go figure, criminals aren't truthful.In the eyes of the gun store that sold Houser the gun, he was a law abiding citizen. God knows how many other "law abiding citizens" they've sold guns to.It proves that you can't create a new law or restriction that would have prevented this.Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.He legally bought a gun. He did not commit arson. He was not convicted of trespassing. His 'theft' was stealing campaign signs from the road. He was never convicted of domestic violence.
So yes, it is YOU lying.
Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
All you can do is make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to buy a gun
Assumptions not in evidenceGod, you guys must live your lives in a state of constant fear.
You're thousands of times more likely to be murdered by a family member than be a victim of an act of "terror" in the US.
How much freedom are you guys willing to give up for your false sense of security?
Good, then we can have our guns...God, you guys must live your lives in a state of constant fear.
You're thousands of times more likely to be murdered by a family member than be a victim of an act of "terror" in the US.
How much freedom are you guys willing to give up for your false sense of security?
Thanks for coming on board.
Or are you afraid???
Assumptions not in evidenceGod, you guys must live your lives in a state of constant fear.
You're thousands of times more likely to be murdered by a family member than be a victim of an act of "terror" in the US.
How much freedom are you guys willing to give up for your false sense of security?
Don't let me distract you from spinning lies meant to justify illegally disarming of America.So how long have you been a criminal?So he lied. Go figure, criminals aren't truthful.In the eyes of the gun store that sold Houser the gun, he was a law abiding citizen. God knows how many other "law abiding citizens" they've sold guns to.It proves that you can't create a new law or restriction that would have prevented this.Oh so you're saying the gun buying process is too lax. Gotcha.Moron...
Lafayette Theater Shooter s Pistol Purchase Was Not In Fact Legal - The Truth About Guns
In order to purchase the handgun, the person in question would have completed the ATF’s “Firearms Transaction Record” paperwork, affectionately known as an ATF Form 4473. Anyone who has ever bought a gun from a FFL license holder should recognize question 11 (F):
Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
As we already know, the attacker in this case was involuntarily committed to a mental institution after being judged a danger to himself and others in 2008. Legally, the person filling out the form would be required to tick the “YES” box — anything else would constitute a felony, as stated on the declaration that the buyer is required to sign. The problem in this case is that the attacker most likely lied, checked the “NO” box, and the subsequent NICS background check didn’t include that nugget of information.
And even if the ATF had discovered Houser’s lie, there’s almost no chance they would have done anything about it.
So this isn’t a story of broken gun laws, but one of a broken system. Just as in the case of the Charleston church shooting, the attacker in question purchased his firearm from a law-abiding gun dealer who dutifully followed the law to the best of their abilities. Where things broke down in both instances was that the NICS system apparently did not have the relevant information at hand, and as a result the individuals (who should have otherwise been barred from purchasing firearms under existing laws) walked out with a brand new handgun.
All you can do is make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to buy a gun
