Hogg WILD!

These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.
 
As a nation, we need to understand that our politicians will not lift a finger to try to curtail gun violence.

Much like with cigarettes, the change will have to come from within. The public will have to look down on gun ownership, wives will need to say.... I don’t want guns in my house, children will not want their fathers guns
Those who politically support guns will have to answer for it, businesses that support gun ownership will lose business

Wives will not tell their husband they don't want guns in the house. Husbands tell their wives how to vote.....at least according to Hillary.

The people may look down on mass murders and all murders, but they're not going to look down on guns. If anything, gun ownership and carrying is a growing trend in this country.

Years ago when my friends and I went shooting, there were plenty of stalls available at the only shooting range in town. Today there are several ranges, and most waiting times to get a stall is about an hour.

I remember a few times guys would be on the range having a blast hitting targets. Their female companions were always behind the glass looking on or just reading book. Today, half of the range are women. In fact in my state, women outnumbered the amount of CCW applications. Like I said, a quickly growing trend.
 
He has a talent? And what might that be?

This kid is high on himself thanks to the Democrat party and their associates in the MSM. He is meaningless, it's just that he doesn't realize it yet. When he does, he will just get angrier and perhaps more desperate to maintain the attention.

If he really wants to make change, the best way to do it is study. As we became a more armed society, our gun violence and violence in general reduced as much as 50%. In countries that created bans, their violent crime rates increased because people didn't have the ability to protect themselves, and in some cases, the bad guys still had guns.

If the NRA closed down tomorrow, it wouldn't prevent the next mass shooting, or the next, or the next. This kid doesn't understand that. He's been brainwashed by the Democrats that the NRA is the problem when the NRA had nothing to do with one mass shooting in this country.

Non-sense. The NRA funds Congress who keeps us from passing common-sense gun laws that should have been passed after Columbine.

As for his talents...activism for one. Sort of like your buddy Zimmerman with a brain. Remember the RW hero Zimmerman? Are you guys still embracing him?

Why shouldn't we? He's a person who used deadly force in self-defense after being attacked.
You guys never seem to mention him anymore. Now that he's a confirmed wife beater, I would imagine you guys would be recommending him for saint-hood.

We were never fans of his like you are with Camera Hogg. We simply supported his actions using deadly force in self-defense which is legal in Florida and many states. The guy was railroaded because of political pressure and that's a travesty no matter who you are.
I disproved that lie in post 202. Try again.

As for us not bringing him up anymore, why should we?

You said the following:
Much like the minorities in this country, he fails to realize the Democrat party is using him like an old washrag. See if anybody even remembers his name in a year from today.
So all of that nonsense about the left "forgetting" people is just the same thing the right wing does; but it is somehow more noble when you guys do it...right?[/QUOTE]

Never said it was and I didn't brig up the subject--you did.

"If you want to see what the left is up to, just take note of what they accuse the Republicans of."
Rush Limbaugh

The only point I made is that we didn't make Zimmerman the king of our platform. It was a situation, we chimed in on it, and when it was over, it was over. If anybody kept bringing him up after the trial, it was the MSM and the left.
 
Non-sense. The NRA funds Congress who keeps us from passing common-sense gun laws that should have been passed after Columbine.

As for his talents...activism for one. Sort of like your buddy Zimmerman with a brain. Remember the RW hero Zimmerman? Are you guys still embracing him?

Why shouldn't we? He's a person who used deadly force in self-defense after being attacked.
You guys never seem to mention him anymore. Now that he's a confirmed wife beater, I would imagine you guys would be recommending him for saint-hood.

We were never fans of his like you are with Camera Hogg. We simply supported his actions using deadly force in self-defense which is legal in Florida and many states. The guy was railroaded because of political pressure and that's a travesty no matter who you are.
I disproved that lie in post 202. Try again.

As for us not bringing him up anymore, why should we?

You said the following:
Much like the minorities in this country, he fails to realize the Democrat party is using him like an old washrag. See if anybody even remembers his name in a year from today.
So all of that nonsense about the left "forgetting" people is just the same thing the right wing does; but it is somehow more noble when you guys do it...right?

Never said it was and I didn't brig up the subject--you did.

"If you want to see what the left is up to, just take note of what they accuse the Republicans of."
Rush Limbaugh

The only point I made is that we didn't make Zimmerman the king of our platform. It was a situation, we chimed in on it, and when it was over, it was over. If anybody kept bringing him up after the trial, it was the MSM and the left.[/QUOTE]

he he he….

Oh yeah, hogg is now “king of the platform” for the Democrats. Total nonsense….

You said nobody embraced him; I showed you that you guys did just that.
 
Much like with cigarettes, the change will have to come from within. The public will have to look down on gun ownership, wives will need to say.... I don’t want guns in my house, children will not want their fathers guns
Those who politically support guns will have to answer for it, businesses that support gun ownership will lose business

Likewise those of us with firearms will have a response. We will willingly avoid your places of business and individuals who dont want guns. More importantly, we will make sure every burglar, mugger, rapist and murderer knows which of you have no means to defend yourselves.
Go for it skippy
 
That was a stupid post...even for you.

And you'd like to dispute it.

I realize that as a left winger, you assume everyone thinks you know what you are talking about.

When in reality, we laugh at you...all the while wondering just how it is you could have fucked up in 2016.

Zimmerman is a serial wife/girlfriend beater. Its not hard if you do some research....and you guys embrace him.

Weinstein, Lauer, Rose, Oreskes, Halperin, Affleck & Hoffman? They're all libs and they're all serial sexual predators. You on the left "embraced" all of them far more than we on the right ever embraced Zimmerman! Like I said, Candy...you progressives need to find a new narrative to run on because claiming the right "hates women" when what so many of your prominent liberals have been doing makes that FARCE!

Quote some liberal on this board embracing them then. I've shown where posters here have embraced GZ....it's your turn.

Nice attempt at goalpost-moving. Too bad for you that no one is going to allow you to define "the left" down to "liberals on this board".

And the story on Zimmerman remains, "You tried to lynch him as your 'eeevil racist' du jour, and we insisted on reason and rule of law instead." You are welcome to cast that in the same unhinged hero-worshipping mania you lefties routinely engage in, because . . . hey, no one gives a fart in a wind tunnel what YOU think, anyway.

Yet here you are…if you didn’t care you’d be somewhere else embarrassing yourself.
 
Zimmerman is a serial wife/girlfriend beater. Its not hard if you do some research....and you guys embrace him.

Weinstein, Lauer, Rose, Oreskes, Halperin, Affleck & Hoffman? They're all libs and they're all serial sexual predators. You on the left "embraced" all of them far more than we on the right ever embraced Zimmerman! Like I said, Candy...you progressives need to find a new narrative to run on because claiming the right "hates women" when what so many of your prominent liberals have been doing makes that FARCE!

Quote some liberal on this board embracing them then. I've shown where posters here have embraced GZ....it's your turn.

I simply pointed out that your usual claim that conservatives "hate women"...a claim that you on the left have been making for the last two election cycles...becomes laughably farcical when so many of your liberal icons have been exposed as serial sexual predators. It's your turn to address that...

Liberal Icons like who? TV morning show hosts? A Hollywood producer? A night time PBS host? Basically anyone on TV is suddenly a Liberal Icon? I don’t know their politics and neither do you.

As long as Trump who calls women pigs, as long as Trump who cheats on his wife with whores, as long as Trump, the pussy grabber, as long as Trump who insinuates women who have the temerity to question him are on their period is in office, the women’s vote isn’t going anywhere.

You don't know their politics? Amusing, Candy...

You seem to know who they are...and the jobs that they held. Funny how you suddenly don't have a clue as to what their politics are!
I don’t know their politics….

If you do, I’m sure you can support it with some evidence….

Betcha can’t.
 
He can stand for whatever he wants. My only point is this kid really needs a job. You can learn a lot more by working than you can starting trouble. You can get further ahead in life by working than making a fool of yourself.

If this kid was doing the same thing only for more guns in school, I can just imagine what your stance would be on him then. The only reason you adore him and what he's doing is because he's anti-gun just like you are.

I think he needs a job too. I think rightwinger thinks he does too. RW said "trivial job".... Your reflex to disagree with everything someone who thinks a little differently apparently prevented you from seeing that.

He has some talent. He should develop it. But the only way to make sustainable change (unless you really re-invent the mousetrap) is to work within the system and effect it from the inside out.

He has a talent? And what might that be?

This kid is high on himself thanks to the Democrat party and their associates in the MSM. He is meaningless, it's just that he doesn't realize it yet. When he does, he will just get angrier and perhaps more desperate to maintain the attention.

If he really wants to make change, the best way to do it is study. As we became a more armed society, our gun violence and violence in general reduced as much as 50%. In countries that created bans, their violent crime rates increased because people didn't have the ability to protect themselves, and in some cases, the bad guys still had guns.

If the NRA closed down tomorrow, it wouldn't prevent the next mass shooting, or the next, or the next. This kid doesn't understand that. He's been brainwashed by the Democrats that the NRA is the problem when the NRA had nothing to do with one mass shooting in this country.

Non-sense. The NRA funds Congress who keeps us from passing common-sense gun laws that should have been passed after Columbine.

As for his talents...activism for one. Sort of like your buddy Zimmerman with a brain. Remember the RW hero Zimmerman? Are you guys still embracing him?

Why shouldn't we? He's a person who used deadly force in self-defense after being attacked. Of course we support victims just like you support criminals.

The Republican constituency is mostly pro-gun. Their support has nothing to do with the measly few dollars the NRA gives them. Conservative Republicans are constitutionalists and they support the people who are also constitutionalists.

Now tell us all, what are "common sense" gun laws? We have thousands of gun laws on the books already. What more gun laws do you want to see? What laws would guarantee we would never see a school or mass shooting ever again?

A bet with anti-gunners
Other than the second amendment, Republicans have never read the Constitution

Left wingers haven't even read that, much less any of the rest of it.

Go Fluke yourself.
 
Much like with cigarettes, the change will have to come from within. The public will have to look down on gun ownership, wives will need to say.... I don’t want guns in my house, children will not want their fathers guns
Those who politically support guns will have to answer for it, businesses that support gun ownership will lose business

Likewise those of us with firearms will have a response. We will willingly avoid your places of business and individuals who dont want guns. More importantly, we will make sure every burglar, mugger, rapist and murderer knows which of you have no means to defend yourselves.

Those who don't support gun ownership will love business.

What's the question ?

Can you say Dick's ? Or in the case of RW....just Dick.
 
These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.

For good reason. Unlike males, females live their entire lives with the knowledge that fully half, at least, of the rest of the population is physically much stronger than they are. Odds are really good that getting physically violent is not going to end well for us.
 
Zimmerman is a serial wife/girlfriend beater. Its not hard if you do some research....and you guys embrace him.

His issues with his women are his problem, not ours.

What he did was help to show just what a bunch of hypocrites you motherfuckers are.

So when he was useful to you, you embraced him.
Now that he is no longer useful, you have disavowed him.
Right?

Don't read to well, do you.

Nobody embraced him.

Be advised our traffic enforcement is tight, it generates a lot of revenue. On behalf of all the non bed wetters (they mostly reside in Austin) we're happy to have you.

The moment George Zimmerman was pulled over by cops in Texas for speeding on Sunday - he told them he had a GUN and was 'going nowhere in particular' | Mail Online

We need more people like George Zimmerman

Most Americans think ZMan is a hero s0n!!!:fu:

Again and as always, history reports a far different version of the facts.

PS; it's "too" not "to" dumb ass

Again, as always, "history" is not defined as "the way Candy is going to tell herself things REALLY happened".

PS: Do you REALLY want to open the door to having your own posts proofread?

Great job.....

 
Why shouldn't we? He's a person who used deadly force in self-defense after being attacked.
You guys never seem to mention him anymore. Now that he's a confirmed wife beater, I would imagine you guys would be recommending him for saint-hood.

We were never fans of his like you are with Camera Hogg. We simply supported his actions using deadly force in self-defense which is legal in Florida and many states. The guy was railroaded because of political pressure and that's a travesty no matter who you are.
I disproved that lie in post 202. Try again.

As for us not bringing him up anymore, why should we?

You said the following:
Much like the minorities in this country, he fails to realize the Democrat party is using him like an old washrag. See if anybody even remembers his name in a year from today.
So all of that nonsense about the left "forgetting" people is just the same thing the right wing does; but it is somehow more noble when you guys do it...right?

Never said it was and I didn't brig up the subject--you did.

"If you want to see what the left is up to, just take note of what they accuse the Republicans of."
Rush Limbaugh

The only point I made is that we didn't make Zimmerman the king of our platform. It was a situation, we chimed in on it, and when it was over, it was over. If anybody kept bringing him up after the trial, it was the MSM and the left.

he he he….

Oh yeah, hogg is now “king of the platform” for the Democrats. Total nonsense….

You said nobody embraced him; I showed you that you guys did just that.[/QUOTE]

As I recall, you showed us ONE sentence from ONE post from ONE person, who was most likely just trying to annoy dimwits like you so that he could watch your hair catch fire.

Meanwhile, I can show you any number of MSM articles extolling the wonders of David Hogg, plus reams of posts from this board fawning over him.
 
And you'd like to dispute it.

I realize that as a left winger, you assume everyone thinks you know what you are talking about.

When in reality, we laugh at you...all the while wondering just how it is you could have fucked up in 2016.

Zimmerman is a serial wife/girlfriend beater. Its not hard if you do some research....and you guys embrace him.

Weinstein, Lauer, Rose, Oreskes, Halperin, Affleck & Hoffman? They're all libs and they're all serial sexual predators. You on the left "embraced" all of them far more than we on the right ever embraced Zimmerman! Like I said, Candy...you progressives need to find a new narrative to run on because claiming the right "hates women" when what so many of your prominent liberals have been doing makes that FARCE!

Quote some liberal on this board embracing them then. I've shown where posters here have embraced GZ....it's your turn.

Nice attempt at goalpost-moving. Too bad for you that no one is going to allow you to define "the left" down to "liberals on this board".

And the story on Zimmerman remains, "You tried to lynch him as your 'eeevil racist' du jour, and we insisted on reason and rule of law instead." You are welcome to cast that in the same unhinged hero-worshipping mania you lefties routinely engage in, because . . . hey, no one gives a fart in a wind tunnel what YOU think, anyway.

Yet here you are…if you didn’t care you’d be somewhere else embarrassing yourself.

Riiiiight. Because there's nothing in the world that I do just to idly kill time; if I'm doing it, it MUST be deeply important and I must care.

Exactly the sort of logic I'd expect from someone whose brain is still in the original packaging.

Oh, and FYI: "embarrassing" would require that people whose opinions I respect think badly of me. They don't, and you aren't one of them.
 
These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.

Funny…

When a guy drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often he gets a ticket
When a gal drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often she gets a ticket

When a guy takes an antibiotic, it attacks an infection in his body.
When a gal takes an antibiotic, it attack an infection in her body.

When a guy takes Aderall, the NRA would have you believe that it turns him into a homicidal maniac.
When a gal takes Aderall, the drug has no effect except to address her depression.

Shocking it only happens in the US….
 
You guys never seem to mention him anymore. Now that he's a confirmed wife beater, I would imagine you guys would be recommending him for saint-hood.

We were never fans of his like you are with Camera Hogg. We simply supported his actions using deadly force in self-defense which is legal in Florida and many states. The guy was railroaded because of political pressure and that's a travesty no matter who you are.
I disproved that lie in post 202. Try again.

As for us not bringing him up anymore, why should we?

You said the following:
Much like the minorities in this country, he fails to realize the Democrat party is using him like an old washrag. See if anybody even remembers his name in a year from today.
So all of that nonsense about the left "forgetting" people is just the same thing the right wing does; but it is somehow more noble when you guys do it...right?

Never said it was and I didn't brig up the subject--you did.

"If you want to see what the left is up to, just take note of what they accuse the Republicans of."
Rush Limbaugh

The only point I made is that we didn't make Zimmerman the king of our platform. It was a situation, we chimed in on it, and when it was over, it was over. If anybody kept bringing him up after the trial, it was the MSM and the left.

he he he….

Oh yeah, hogg is now “king of the platform” for the Democrats. Total nonsense….

You said nobody embraced him; I showed you that you guys did just that.

As I recall, you showed us ONE sentence from ONE post from ONE person, who was most likely just trying to annoy dimwits like you so that he could watch your hair catch fire.

Meanwhile, I can show you any number of MSM articles extolling the wonders of David Hogg, plus reams of posts from this board fawning over him.[/QUOTE]

You recall wrong or you’re just being your usual dishonest self. Tired of your yammering.

Off to ignore land for you for a while

<plink>
 
We were never fans of his like you are with Camera Hogg. We simply supported his actions using deadly force in self-defense which is legal in Florida and many states. The guy was railroaded because of political pressure and that's a travesty no matter who you are.
I disproved that lie in post 202. Try again.

As for us not bringing him up anymore, why should we?

You said the following:
Much like the minorities in this country, he fails to realize the Democrat party is using him like an old washrag. See if anybody even remembers his name in a year from today.
So all of that nonsense about the left "forgetting" people is just the same thing the right wing does; but it is somehow more noble when you guys do it...right?

Never said it was and I didn't brig up the subject--you did.

"If you want to see what the left is up to, just take note of what they accuse the Republicans of."
Rush Limbaugh

The only point I made is that we didn't make Zimmerman the king of our platform. It was a situation, we chimed in on it, and when it was over, it was over. If anybody kept bringing him up after the trial, it was the MSM and the left.

he he he….

Oh yeah, hogg is now “king of the platform” for the Democrats. Total nonsense….

You said nobody embraced him; I showed you that you guys did just that.

As I recall, you showed us ONE sentence from ONE post from ONE person, who was most likely just trying to annoy dimwits like you so that he could watch your hair catch fire.

Meanwhile, I can show you any number of MSM articles extolling the wonders of David Hogg, plus reams of posts from this board fawning over him.

You recall wrong or you’re just being your usual dishonest self. Tired of your yammering.

Off to ignore land for you for a while

<plink>[/QUOTE]

I just heard, "How DARE you disagree with me! I must run away!"

Buh bye, dumbass. :fu:

And leftists wonder why we say they live in an echo chamber.
 
These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.

Funny…

When a guy drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often he gets a ticket
When a gal drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often she gets a ticket

When a guy takes an antibiotic, it attacks an infection in his body.
When a gal takes an antibiotic, it attack an infection in her body.

When a guy takes Aderall, the NRA would have you believe that it turns him into a homicidal maniac.
When a gal takes Aderall, the drug has no effect except to address her depression.

Shocking it only happens in the US….

I seriously doubt it only happens in the US. But we probably consumer more medications than anybody else around the world as well.

If you know what the word "inherently" means, that's what I meant when I said men are generally more violent than women. I seriously doubt you want to challenge me on that. All men? No. Are all women passive and not prone to violence? No. But again, generally speaking.
 
The beanpole bully is behind a "lay in" at his local Publix grocery store. Seems the company made a contribution to a politician Hogg doesn't like. So his band of dingoes lay on the floor of the store like they are dead. And the customers ignore them, do their shopping and maybe "accidentally" step on one's head.

DeFXG5AV0AABoFq.jpg


His charisma quickly fading, Hogg will be driven to plot more strange events like this one and eventually will fade from sight, becoming a violent alcoholic....well, as violent as an 80 pound pile of bones can be.
lol.gif


Shoppers Step Over Bodies at Hogg-Led Publix Protests
☝️☝️☝️TRIGGERED!!!
lol.gif
lol.gif
lol.gif
 
These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.

Funny…

When a guy drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often he gets a ticket
When a gal drinks too much; he gets drunk. He uses his car (a tool) and plows down the road recklessly. Often she gets a ticket

When a guy takes an antibiotic, it attacks an infection in his body.
When a gal takes an antibiotic, it attack an infection in her body.

When a guy takes Aderall, the NRA would have you believe that it turns him into a homicidal maniac.
When a gal takes Aderall, the drug has no effect except to address her depression.

Shocking it only happens in the US….

I seriously doubt it only happens in the US. But we probably consumer more medications than anybody else around the world as well.

If you know what the word "inherently" means, that's what I meant when I said men are generally more violent than women. I seriously doubt you want to challenge me on that. All men? No. Are all women passive and not prone to violence? No. But again, generally speaking.

And drugs make you act ________________. Anti depressants work to cure your depression. Sedatives sedate you. Anti-inflammatory meds reduce swelling. It works the same way for men and women. Apparently somehow the SSRIs according to the medical experts at the NRA testify that they make kids homicidal maniacs while ignoring the fact that only one gender is affected by the drugs.

As for the US takes more drugs...so? Platoons of whacked out kids are not storming schools; it's individuals.
 
These school shootings to me point out massive failures in our mental health professions (has giving all those kids all of those drugs for all of those years for ADD finally coming home to roost?) and how the authorities react to obviously troubled individuals! Gun control isn't the answer for either of those things.
Yet...isn't it odd that girls get those same drugs for ADD and they manage to not shoot up schools.

Gender 101: Females are less physically violent than males.

For good reason. Unlike males, females live their entire lives with the knowledge that fully half, at least, of the rest of the population is physically much stronger than they are. Odds are really good that getting physically violent is not going to end well for us.

I think it's a little more than that. For instance if two guys get into a bar fight, the males in the bar enjoy the action. Females don't want to even look unless it's somebody they know and actually worried about. If anything, they might try to break up the fight.

I don't know many women who enjoy boxing as a sport. Some like football, I know plenty that like our Cleveland Indians, but never once did I meet a woman who likes to sit down with a beer and watch two guys beat the hell out of each other in a ring.

In general women just don't like violence be it with themselves or somebody else. I know a few times in my younger years where a girlfriend tried to calm me down because an argument got loud. I'm not a violent person by nature, and I'm sure my GF's were not worried about me getting beat up. I'm 6;3" I weighed 240 lbs, and a black belt. But the idea of me possibly getting in a fight win, lose or draw frightened women.
 

Forum List

Back
Top