Sherri only focuses her attention where the Jews are involved
That's a weird obssession I cannot figure out.
Be glad, Lipush! Be very glad! : ))
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Sherri only focuses her attention where the Jews are involved
That's a weird obssession I cannot figure out.
I think Seal's understanding of the law is flawed and inaccurate.
And the comparison is worthless: it is dismissive.
But then, I wouldn't expect anyone who feels 'Israel should never have existed' is able to be objective enough to understand the problems with such a view.
perhaps your opinion of my understanding and objectivity is subject to your own vested self interest in the matter. i have no vested interest in particular so, on the surface at least, it is you whose opinions are probably more subjective.
i am opposed to foreign colonisation and always have been. were the jews not involved at all and the colonisation continued under the british mandate, i would be no less opposed.
you really haven't said much. why is my opinion dismissive and worthless. why does my eeling that israel, modern israel, should never have existed call into question my objectivity.
why don't you tell me why it should have been created, and particularly at the expense of those indigenous people already there at the time. i assume that your answer, given your egalitarian beliefs, be consistant with other similar situations that might arise.
Haven't you watched "Exodus" with Paul Newman? The Arabs living there were invited to stay, but their representative (John Derek) said, "We choose to leave".
I understand your POV deach----There were lots of
people in the USA who felt that the Irish immigration
to the USA should never have been allowed because
it was acted to the detriment of honest americans.
In the late 1800s there were Irish immigrants living
in the USA --in New York City who lynched blacks
who had come to the New York to escape oppression
in the South.
In the first and second centuries AD----the founder of
your cult --Constantine issued laws legalizing the genocide
of jews living in Israel/Judea for several thousand
years ---and in that time the name of the area became
"palestine" Within a few centuries of that the same
cult developed a system of genocide generally known as the
INQUISITION-----to 'cleanse and purify lands' ---that
led to the genocide of hundreds of millions---across
europe, asia, africa and the americas. Ever Impressed
with the greek, roman, and holy roman legacy of
the West ----muslims used similar laws to commit
even more massive genocides bits of which are still
ongoing.
that you feel justified in your position is
nothing remarkable ----so did Genghis Khan
you misunderstood me, but that is my fault for being unclear. i apologise for that.
the knesset has passed a law aimed to cut off public funding to those organisations that participate in commemorating yawm an-nakba.
but, i guess that is what a jewish democracy looks like.
Can you please tell me why shall Israeli taxes go to organizations which don't recognize Israel's right to exist?
This law makes total sense.
the law is broader than that.
it would be as if we had a law that refused to fund those organisations that acknowledged slavery.
Can you please tell me why shall Israeli taxes go to organizations which don't recognize Israel's right to exist?
This law makes total sense.
the law is broader than that.
it would be as if we had a law that refused to fund those organisations that acknowledged slavery.
No, the idea is that if they want to mention the Nakba, they can, please let them.
Not from MY money, though.
*That* is the main idea.
No one ignored or ignoreS history. IF they want to mention the tragedy that is Israel, they won't do it from my check payments.
Which seems more than fair to me.
I didn't say they don't have the right to tell the story.
I say that if they see Israel's establishment as a "catastrophe", my money will not help funding that agenda.
There is no reason why they hands should be inside my wallet for that one.