Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gays are responsible for 1/3 of all sex crimes against Children- that's approximately 30 - 35%
And when Iook into the victim numbers, that dog won't hunt. 1 in 5 girls are sexually abused. But only 1 in 20 boys.
Child Sexual Abuse Statistics
Which means that 20% of women are abused, but only 5% of boys. And we know that there are a shit load of self professed heterosexuals that molest boys. So how can your numbers possible work? Are homosexual men molesting girls? Which makes no sense at all.
When I look for info on your stat, I get the "Family Research Council', a Christian policy making ministry. Which already sets off some red flags. And if you go to the Journal of Sex Research, it counts every man that sexually abuses a boy as a 'homosexual pedophile', even when that person is a self proclaimed heterosexual and has an ongoing sexual relationship with women.
In a study of 269 cases of child sex abuse, only two offenders where found to be gay or lesbian. More relevant was the finding that of the cases involving molestation of a boy by a man, seventy-four percent of the men were or had been in a heterosexual relationship with the boys mother or another female relative.
Gay and Lesbian Adoptive Parents Issues and Concerns - FindLaw
Meaning every single one of these men that were in a heterosexual relationship with the boys mothers or female relative.....you're counting as a homosexual. Despite the fact that they self identify as a heterosexual, sleep with women and have ongoing sexual relationships with women.
That's ridiculous. These are heterosexual men molesting those boy. And the same study found this:
The conclusion was found that "a child's risk of being molested by his or her relative's heterosexual partner is over one hundred times greater than by someone who might be identifiable as being homosexual." -
Gay and Lesbian Adoptive Parents Issues and Concerns - FindLaw
And this is your great 'gay scourge'?
Um, no.
What else have you got?
You do realize that pedophiles and gay pederasts marry and raise a family to mask their true intentions and lifestyle, don't you?
You do realize that heterosexual men can molest boys, don't you? Because the stats being aped by your ilk don't account for that at all. Despite nearly 75% of the men that molested boys being in a relationship with that child's mother or female relative.
And nearly 99% of the molesters self identifying as heterosexual.
And nearly 99% of the molesters self identifying as heterosexual
As has been aptly demonstrated "self identification" means very little. When a male engages in sexual activity with another male - regardless of "self identification" .... he's a queer.
You do realize that heterosexual men can molest boys, don't you?
BULLSHIT
When a male engages in sexual activity with another male - regardless of "self identification" .... he's a queer. If he also has an attraction to females he's half a queer [a bisexual] .
No Semantic side step shuffle shoe is going to change reality pal - a faggot is a faggot and many are also pedophiles to boot
Skyler, even Christ lost it and went on a rampage.
Yeah... Christ said that a person who harms a child. Would be better off to go out to sea and tie a MILLSTONE around their neck and drop it into the water... than to let themselves die. Because when they stand before God... being drug mercilessly to the bottom of the ocean is going to look like a SUPERIOR WAY TO GO!
In terms of 'war' and merciless carnage on homosexuals... THAT is the LAST WORD right there.
IF you really believed that, then you would leave the judgement to Jesus, and stop trying to persecute homosexuals.
No one wants to persecute homosexuals. What people want is to leave them alone. It's the homosexuals that don't tolerate being let alone. They want to insinuate themselves into everyone else's lives.
...that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
Certainly ONE of the greatest threats to America's foundational standards. Just as bad, though, is the Globalist agenda (no more borders; international trade agreements/treaties; etc.). Just as bad is our general but purposeful move towards Socialism (both sides of the aisle are guilty).
Anybody who thinks there's a "homosexual agenda" is a moron. /thread.
Yes, how terrible, faggots being treated like anyone else:Anybody who thinks there's a "homosexual agenda" is a moron. /thread.
Obviously you've never read , or if you did - it's evident you were incapable of comprehending the works the works of Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsden . Do you even know who they are ?
Gays are responsible for 1/3 of all sex crimes against Children- that's approximately 30 - 35%
And when Iook into the victim numbers, that dog won't hunt. 1 in 5 girls are sexually abused. But only 1 in 20 boys.
Child Sexual Abuse Statistics
Which means that 20% of women are abused, but only 5% of boys. And we know that there are a shit load of self professed heterosexuals that molest boys. So how can your numbers possible work? Are homosexual men molesting girls? Which makes no sense at all.
When I look for info on your stat, I get the "Family Research Council', a Christian policy making ministry. Which already sets off some red flags. And if you go to the Journal of Sex Research, it counts every man that sexually abuses a boy as a 'homosexual pedophile', even when that person is a self proclaimed heterosexual and has an ongoing sexual relationship with women.
In a study of 269 cases of child sex abuse, only two offenders where found to be gay or lesbian. More relevant was the finding that of the cases involving molestation of a boy by a man, seventy-four percent of the men were or had been in a heterosexual relationship with the boys mother or another female relative.
Gay and Lesbian Adoptive Parents Issues and Concerns - FindLaw
Meaning every single one of these men that were in a heterosexual relationship with the boys mothers or female relative.....you're counting as a homosexual. Despite the fact that they self identify as a heterosexual, sleep with women and have ongoing sexual relationships with women.
That's ridiculous. These are heterosexual men molesting those boy. And the same study found this:
The conclusion was found that "a child's risk of being molested by his or her relative's heterosexual partner is over one hundred times greater than by someone who might be identifiable as being homosexual." -
Gay and Lesbian Adoptive Parents Issues and Concerns - FindLaw
And this is your great 'gay scourge'?
Um, no.
What else have you got?
You do realize that pedophiles and gay pederasts marry and raise a family to mask their true intentions and lifestyle, don't you?
You do realize that heterosexual men can molest boys, don't you? Because the stats being aped by your ilk don't account for that at all. Despite nearly 75% of the men that molested boys being in a relationship with that child's mother or female relative.
And nearly 99% of the molesters self identifying as heterosexual.
And nearly 99% of the molesters self identifying as heterosexual
As has been aptly demonstrated "self identification" means very little. When a male engages in sexual activity with another male - regardless of "self identification" .... he's a queer.
You do realize that heterosexual men can molest boys, don't you?
BULLSHIT
When a male engages in sexual activity with another male - regardless of "self identification" .... he's a queer. If he also has an attraction to females he's half a queer [a bisexual] .
No Semantic side step shuffle shoe is going to change reality pal - a faggot is a faggot and many are also pedophiles to boot
Pedophiles love homophobes like you.
Seriously- you help pedophiles- you enable pedophiles- you help pedophiles gain access to children.
Because homophobes like you tell the world that homosexuals are the pedophiles.
Leaving monsters like Jerry Sandusky- openly heterosexual husband and father, an iconic sports coach- unsuspected by parents who feel safe knowing he isn't a homosexual, so their little boys could be dropped off with him.
Homophobic bigots like yourself endanger children.
The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments. — Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78
Hamilton you say? Federalist Paper 78 you say? Why lets dig in.
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.
Alexander Hamilton
Federalist Paper 78
Huh. Its almost as if you never read Federalist Paper 78, have no idea what's in it, and have never once fact checked your claims.
See, Mike, that's the difference between us. You copy and paste lists. I actually do research and read the sources.
Incorrect as usual, and I'm sure you're just as much a "constitutional scholar" as the poop stain in the White House.
Alexander Hamilton argued for a Supreme Court that was confirmed by the Senate and not the House of Representatives saying:
A body so fluctuating and at the same time so numerous, can never be deemed proper for the exercise of that power. Its unfitness will appear manifest to all, when it is recollected that in half a century it may consist of three or four hundred persons. All the advantages of the stability, both of the Executive and of the Senate, would be defeated by this union, and infinite delays and embarrassments would be occasioned.
In retrospect, Hamilton could only have been arguing for input from the States on judiciary appointments since at the time, Senators were appointed by state legislators, not by popular vote. Hamilton pointedly warned of the danger of judges being appointed by popular winds, saying:
the necessity of their [the Senate’s] concurrence would have a powerful, though, in general, a silent operation. It would be an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the President, and would tend greatly to prevent the appointment of unfit characters from State prejudice, from family connection, from personal attachment, or from a view to popularity. In addition to this, it would be an efficacious source of stability in the administration.
One can only guess that Hamilton might have had a different view of Senate confirmations if the 17th Amendment were already passed. It might also be noted that the Constitution would never have been ratified to begin with had it been written in such way as to give the States no representation whatsoever in Washington D.C.
What, pray tell is that image supposed to be - are you picking your nose and flinging your boogers ? because it's obvious you have nothing of any value to add -regards booger finger.And here you are again with your pompous and condescending attitude like you are a scholar.
You are so , partly , entertaining if it were not for the fact that you really believe all your own bullshit.
The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments. — Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78
Hamilton you say? Federalist Paper 78 you say? Why lets dig in.
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.
Alexander Hamilton
Federalist Paper 78
Huh. Its almost as if you never read Federalist Paper 78, have no idea what's in it, and have never once fact checked your claims.
See, Mike, that's the difference between us. You copy and paste lists. I actually do research and read the sources.
Incorrect as usual, and I'm sure you're just as much a "constitutional scholar" as the poop stain in the White House.
Alexander Hamilton argued for a Supreme Court that was confirmed by the Senate and not the House of Representatives saying:
A body so fluctuating and at the same time so numerous, can never be deemed proper for the exercise of that power. Its unfitness will appear manifest to all, when it is recollected that in half a century it may consist of three or four hundred persons. All the advantages of the stability, both of the Executive and of the Senate, would be defeated by this union, and infinite delays and embarrassments would be occasioned.
In retrospect, Hamilton could only have been arguing for input from the States on judiciary appointments since at the time, Senators were appointed by state legislators, not by popular vote. Hamilton pointedly warned of the danger of judges being appointed by popular winds, saying:
the necessity of their [the Senate’s] concurrence would have a powerful, though, in general, a silent operation. It would be an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the President, and would tend greatly to prevent the appointment of unfit characters from State prejudice, from family connection, from personal attachment, or from a view to popularity. In addition to this, it would be an efficacious source of stability in the administration.
One can only guess that Hamilton might have had a different view of Senate confirmations if the 17th Amendment were already passed. It might also be noted that the Constitution would never have been ratified to begin with had it been written in such way as to give the States no representation whatsoever in Washington D.C.
I have no quarrel with Gays per se.
I do, however, take exception with the Gay "Community" branding me as well as my family "homophobes" for the mere fact that we hold dear our own heterosexual family unit as sacrosanct.
We feel unprotected and threatened, By Gays. By Golly.
Hey to all you Gay ass-fuckers out there- please do not threaten my heterosexual family unit.
I thank you in advance.
...that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
This dude spends way too much time thinking about who sticks or licks someone else where on their bodies. Irregardless of what the homos are doing this freak has too much access to a video camera and a microphone. What he needs is a couple of serious court orders to cease and desist. His income seems highly likely tied to his rants that obviously or more likely probably violate laws on harrassment based on sexual orientation.
Well, I tell ya what... you get their sex life out of public policy and you'll find that our interest in their sex life drops off immediately.
OR... you'll all find out why and how the homosexuals ended up in the closest in the fist place. (It was the safest place to BE.)
Hate crimes are very real and involve everything from harrassment and hate mail all the way to 1st degree murder.
There is nothing intrusive about the existance of this type of legislation and consequenses for participating in this kind of activiy.
If YOU feel YOUR rights are violated by the existance of these laws then there is something very sick about your character.
Hate crimes are a fascist PC means to push offensive destructive behavior onto a sheepish culture.
And your position here is a classic demonstration of the evil inherent to such.
We're not hating anyone sparky... but we dam' sure do not intend to allow these pervs to cripple the culture in which we live and in which we raise our children. If this cult doesn't sit down and shut the fuck up, they're going to ignite a war that will make 'hate crimes' look like a lovely Sunday brunch. And if you need that to be the fault of the defense... that's fine. But that will not help ya get through it, in the slightest.
You people are screwin' with forces that you've no means to comprehend... you think that such crap can't happen here... You're entire existence is watching people tolerate intolerable shit, so you just assume that that's how the world works... just as the people in every country, in every culture thought that it couldn't happen to them, when most of them had FAR LESS REASON TO BELIEVE IT.
It happened TWICE in Europe, within TWO GENERATIONS... and for LESS REASON THAN WHAT WE"RE DISCUSSING HERE: BOTH TIMES!
You're siding with EVIL... and that's all there is to it. It's a lie bent around a myth, resting upon a horrible fraudulence. And one of two things is going to happen: Either the homosexuals shut the fuck up... or we're going to shut them up and >IF< THAT is how it goes, we're shutting up the entire Left right along with you ladies.
Believe it, reject it... I don't give a dam'. But that doesn't change the fact that neither I, nor anyone else here represents what is in play... we are but a spec on the wing of a gnat, circling a boil that is festering on the whale that is swimming in the sea of crap that sits over the caldera which is about to blow... and again, all I'm doing is lettin ya know that the water is gettin' mighty hot, so maybe ya shouldn't be droppin all these bombs and drillin' here... .
So if you need to believe that it's the looming eruption is the spec's fault, there's nothing I can do to help ya with that.
...that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
This dude spends way too much time thinking about who sticks or licks someone else where on their bodies. Irregardless of what the homos are doing this freak has too much access to a video camera and a microphone. What he needs is a couple of serious court orders to cease and desist. His income seems highly likely tied to his rants that obviously or more likely probably violate laws on harrassment based on sexual orientation.
Well, I tell ya what... you get their sex life out of public policy and you'll find that our interest in their sex life drops off immediately.
OR... you'll all find out why and how the homosexuals ended up in the closest in the fist place. (It was the safest place to BE.)
Hate crimes are very real and involve everything from harrassment and hate mail all the way to 1st degree murder.
There is nothing intrusive about the existance of this type of legislation and consequenses for participating in this kind of activiy.
If YOU feel YOUR rights are violated by the existance of these laws then there is something very sick about your character.
Hate crimes are a fascist PC means to push offensive destructive behavior onto a sheepish culture.
And your position here is a classic demonstration of the evil inherent to such.
We're not hating anyone sparky... but we dam' sure do not intend to allow these pervs to cripple the culture in which we live and in which we raise our children. If this cult doesn't sit down and shut the fuck up, they're going to ignite a war that will make 'hate crimes' look like a lovely Sunday brunch. And if you need that to be the fault of the defense... that's fine. But that will not help ya get through it, in the slightest.
You people are screwin' with forces that you've no means to comprehend... you think that such crap can't happen here... You're entire existence is watching people tolerate intolerable shit, so you just assume that that's how the world works... just as the people in every country, in every culture thought that it couldn't happen to them, when most of them had FAR LESS REASON TO BELIEVE IT.
It happened TWICE in Europe, within TWO GENERATIONS... and for LESS REASON THAN WHAT WE"RE DISCUSSING HERE: BOTH TIMES!
You're siding with EVIL... and that's all there is to it. It's a lie bent around a myth, resting upon a horrible fraudulence. And one of two things is going to happen: Either the homosexuals shut the fuck up... or we're going to shut them up and >IF< THAT is how it goes, we're shutting up the entire Left right along with you ladies.
Believe it, reject it... I don't give a dam'. But that doesn't change the fact that neither I, nor anyone else here represents what is in play... we are but a spec on the wing of a gnat, circling a boil that is festering on the whale that is swimming in the sea of crap that sits over the caldera which is about to blow... and again, all I'm doing is lettin ya know that the water is gettin' mighty hot, so maybe ya shouldn't be droppin all these bombs and drillin' here... .
So if you need to believe that it's the looming eruption is the spec's fault, there's nothing I can do to help ya with that.
None of which has anything to do with the equal protection rights of same-sex couples to marry or public accommodations laws.
Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Yeah, that's why you described gays as loathsome, ahborred, despised, depraved, deranged, and evil. All with vague threats of violence if they keep making themselves so public.We're not hating anyone sparky... but we dam' sure do not intend to allow these pervs to cripple the culture in which we live and in which we raise our children.
Because you don't hate them?
If this is the product of your 'objective' religion, you are the poster child for what can go wrong with theism.
If this cult doesn't sit down and shut the fuck up, they're going to ignite a war that will make 'hate crimes' look like a lovely Sunday brunch. And if you need that to be the fault of the defense... that's fine. But that will not help ya get through it, in the slightest.
Nope. Here's the part that you forget, Keyes. Most of the hateful bigots in the world like yourself....are natural chickenshits. They don't want to bleed. They want to hurt people, but they don't want to have to hurt. Your 'war' requires shit loads of bleeding. Not someone else's. But yours.
And you won't do it. Neither will your fellow chickenshits.
Oh, I have no doubt that if you find someone gay guy who is sick, or old, or vulnerable.....you'll want to try and hurt them. But those opportunities are comparatively rare. And after you'd done hurting that person, we'll come find you and put you in a cage. And you and your fellow chickenshits know that.
Which is why you're here talking. Rather than doing. There's always an excuse why you can't actually back up your words with actions. And there always will be. Until you and your generations of bigots have died off from the ravages of old age. And a younger, more tolerant group of folks has taken your place.
Your own cowardice protects you as much as it protects the gays you want to hurt. And will likely result to you living to a ripe old age. And a much more tolerant society that doesn't want to hurt people as much you do.
You're siding with EVIL... and that's all there is to it. It's a lie bent around a myth, resting upon a horrible fraudulence. And one of two things is going to happen: Either the homosexuals shut the fuck up... or we're going to shut them up and >IF< THAT is how it goes, we're shutting up the entire Left right along with you ladies.
Nope. You're the one that wants to hurt and wage war against folks you don't know, have never met, and have never done you an ounce of harm. People just trying to raise their families and live their lives. People you hate for no other reason than you were told to. And opposing such stupidity isn't evil. Its the duty of any moral person.
Oh, and Mike....this is your team. Keyes is your people. If you think this is a 'Christ like' way to live, then you really need to crack that book of yours open again. Because you're really not getting it.
Skyler, even Christ lost it and went on a rampage. That's what happens when people get pushed, and you people are pushing us around everywhere. The homosexual agenda is everywhere, which is odd because it's supposed to be a private lifestyle. But here it is shoved in our faces in the workplace, on the football field, in politics, in the media, everywhere. WTF makes you people think you're so important?
You're not seeing anyone actually threaten violence, you're seeing people get frustrated that you "victims" have become the biggest asshole bullies in the country. Makes a person just want to go find a faggot and beat the shit out of him. But not really.
You were told many times on this thread, stop with the aggressive homosexual agenda and you'll see conservatives backing down too. We don't care if you have gay butt sex in your own homes, just keep it out of our lives.
One has to wonder if Putin is far more intelligent than any leader in this country. He sees the danger of the unrestrained homosexual agenda that we just don't want to look at, and like any patriotic Russian, he's taking measures to protect his people. His move to make it illegal for homos to proselytize children was in response to Russian children being adopted to faggots who later abused them. Were I the leader of Russia, that might piss me off too; a reasonable reaction. Besides which, why do homos want to inject their lifestyle into children anyway unless they're perverts? See, this isn't so hard to understand.
In Iran, Saudi Arabia and other countries, homosexuals are hung in the streets. They would only wish to be left alone and not punished for their private lifestyle. I think that not killing or otherwise punishing gay people is enough. Anything more than that is the "victim" turning into a bully.
What is it about Conservatives and their love of the dictator Putin?
And yes- I am sure that homosexuals and negroes are both grateful that they are not hung in the streets in the United States anymore.
How very white of you.
I'm not white, you jackass.
That's ok... She doesn't care... you're conservative, therefore your get treated as white.
Try to not let it bother ya. We're used to it, but sometimes we forget that not everyone knows what its like to be white in a fucked up, bass-ackward, far-side Leftist world.
...that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
This dude spends way too much time thinking about who sticks or licks someone else where on their bodies. Irregardless of what the homos are doing this freak has too much access to a video camera and a microphone. What he needs is a couple of serious court orders to cease and desist. His income seems highly likely tied to his rants that obviously or more likely probably violate laws on harrassment based on sexual orientation.
Well, I tell ya what... you get their sex life out of public policy and you'll find that our interest in their sex life drops off immediately.
OR... you'll all find out why and how the homosexuals ended up in the closest in the fist place. (It was the safest place to BE.)
Hate crimes are very real and involve everything from harrassment and hate mail all the way to 1st degree murder.
There is nothing intrusive about the existance of this type of legislation and consequenses for participating in this kind of activiy.
If YOU feel YOUR rights are violated by the existance of these laws then there is something very sick about your character.
Hate crimes are a fascist PC means to push offensive destructive behavior onto a sheepish culture.
And your position here is a classic demonstration of the evil inherent to such.
We're not hating anyone sparky... but we dam' sure do not intend to allow these pervs to cripple the culture in which we live and in which we raise our children. If this cult doesn't sit down and shut the fuck up, they're going to ignite a war that will make 'hate crimes' look like a lovely Sunday brunch. And if you need that to be the fault of the defense... that's fine. But that will not help ya get through it, in the slightest.
You people are screwin' with forces that you've no means to comprehend... you think that such crap can't happen here... You're entire existence is watching people tolerate intolerable shit, so you just assume that that's how the world works... just as the people in every country, in every culture thought that it couldn't happen to them, when most of them had FAR LESS REASON TO BELIEVE IT.
It happened TWICE in Europe, within TWO GENERATIONS... and for LESS REASON THAN WHAT WE"RE DISCUSSING HERE: BOTH TIMES!
You're siding with EVIL... and that's all there is to it. It's a lie bent around a myth, resting upon a horrible fraudulence. And one of two things is going to happen: Either the homosexuals shut the fuck up... or we're going to shut them up and >IF< THAT is how it goes, we're shutting up the entire Left right along with you ladies.
Believe it, reject it... I don't give a dam'. But that doesn't change the fact that neither I, nor anyone else here represents what is in play... we are but a spec on the wing of a gnat, circling a boil that is festering on the whale that is swimming in the sea of crap that sits over the caldera which is about to blow... and again, all I'm doing is lettin ya know that the water is gettin' mighty hot, so maybe ya shouldn't be droppin all these bombs and drillin' here... .
So if you need to believe that it's the looming eruption is the spec's fault, there's nothing I can do to help ya with that.
You really are a hate filled sick mofo. All this talk of civil wars and bunk is just in yours and your friends little pea brains.
It seems your venom has rotted your brain way past correction. I sincerely hope your stupidity catches up with you before you do any damage to innocents.
One has to wonder if Putin is far more intelligent than any leader in this country. He sees the danger of the unrestrained homosexual agenda that we just don't want to look at, and like any patriotic Russian, he's taking measures to protect his people. His move to make it illegal for homos to proselytize children was in response to Russian children being adopted to faggots who later abused them. Were I the leader of Russia, that might piss me off too; a reasonable reaction. Besides which, why do homos want to inject their lifestyle into children anyway unless they're perverts? See, this isn't so hard to understand.
In Iran, Saudi Arabia and other countries, homosexuals are hung in the streets. They would only wish to be left alone and not punished for their private lifestyle. I think that not killing or otherwise punishing gay people is enough. Anything more than that is the "victim" turning into a bully.
What is it about Conservatives and their love of the dictator Putin?
And yes- I am sure that homosexuals and negroes are both grateful that they are not hung in the streets in the United States anymore.
How very white of you.
I'm not white, you jackass.
That's ok... She doesn't care... you're conservative, therefore your get treated as white.
Try to not let it bother ya. We're used to it, but sometimes we forget that not everyone knows what its like to be white in a fucked up, bass-ackward, far-side Leftist world.
I'm white and I REALLY wish you would stop using that term as it is excrutiatingly embarrassing having you think you speak for me in any way whatsoever. I don't know or care how you turned out to be such a biggoted hateful pig. No one in my family has ever turned out to be like you thank goodness.
You probably know exactly why you have devolved into what you are but like I said...I don't care.
I will just take solice knowing that your kind is fading away into the dustbin of history as more knowledge is available to more and more people and this war you warn of just evaporates with what's left of your poisoned brain cells.
What do you propose be done about it? Outlaw homosexuality? Kill all gay people?...that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
For what it's worth... as a parent of three biological children... my policy was very simple. IF someone molested one of my children, there would be no charges filed, no cries for help, no ass beatin's causing all manner of drama... . The offending party would have just not made it to work one day.
Now I think the reason my children were never so molested is because that was 'THE WAY IT WAS'' that such permeated the air around my children. And as a result, any douchebag that may have ever considered it, without regard to whether or not they even knew of my existence, the moment that they may have considered such with one of my kids... a cold shiver shot up their spine. And without even realizing why, they just lost interest.
I could be wrong... but I expect that I'm pretty close.
FWIW, the same policy is standing in effect all around my grand-children.
She was a total nasty bitch and karma got her.
This country has moved beyond you and your I Hate Faggots mentality. You'll have to find another Jesusland to live in, or you could start dealing with reality like a man? Your call.This dude spends way too much time thinking about who sticks or licks someone else where on their bodies. Irregardless of what the homos are doing this freak has too much access to a video camera and a microphone. What he needs is a couple of serious court orders to cease and desist. His income seems highly likely tied to his rants that obviously or more likely probably violate laws on harrassment based on sexual orientation.
Well, I tell ya what... you get their sex life out of public policy and you'll find that our interest in their sex life drops off immediately.
OR... you'll all find out why and how the homosexuals ended up in the closest in the fist place. (It was the safest place to BE.)
Hate crimes are very real and involve everything from harrassment and hate mail all the way to 1st degree murder.
There is nothing intrusive about the existance of this type of legislation and consequenses for participating in this kind of activiy.
If YOU feel YOUR rights are violated by the existance of these laws then there is something very sick about your character.
Hate crimes are a fascist PC means to push offensive destructive behavior onto a sheepish culture.
And your position here is a classic demonstration of the evil inherent to such.
We're not hating anyone sparky... but we dam' sure do not intend to allow these pervs to cripple the culture in which we live and in which we raise our children. If this cult doesn't sit down and shut the fuck up, they're going to ignite a war that will make 'hate crimes' look like a lovely Sunday brunch. And if you need that to be the fault of the defense... that's fine. But that will not help ya get through it, in the slightest.
You people are screwin' with forces that you've no means to comprehend... you think that such crap can't happen here... You're entire existence is watching people tolerate intolerable shit, so you just assume that that's how the world works... just as the people in every country, in every culture thought that it couldn't happen to them, when most of them had FAR LESS REASON TO BELIEVE IT.
It happened TWICE in Europe, within TWO GENERATIONS... and for LESS REASON THAN WHAT WE"RE DISCUSSING HERE: BOTH TIMES!
You're siding with EVIL... and that's all there is to it. It's a lie bent around a myth, resting upon a horrible fraudulence. And one of two things is going to happen: Either the homosexuals shut the fuck up... or we're going to shut them up and >IF< THAT is how it goes, we're shutting up the entire Left right along with you ladies.
Believe it, reject it... I don't give a dam'. But that doesn't change the fact that neither I, nor anyone else here represents what is in play... we are but a spec on the wing of a gnat, circling a boil that is festering on the whale that is swimming in the sea of crap that sits over the caldera which is about to blow... and again, all I'm doing is lettin ya know that the water is gettin' mighty hot, so maybe ya shouldn't be droppin all these bombs and drillin' here... .
So if you need to believe that it's the looming eruption is the spec's fault, there's nothing I can do to help ya with that.
You really are a hate filled sick mofo. All this talk of civil wars and bunk is just in yours and your friends little pea brains.
It seems your venom has rotted your brain way past correction. I sincerely hope your stupidity catches up with you before you do any damage to innocents.
Yeah.... because war never happens and if it ever did happen, it wasn't because a group of people shoved a bunch of crap onto another group of people who didn't want any part of the crap.
You seem to have put a LOT of thought into this, so I will see if I can find any evidence to support my position that every war that has ever happened anywhere, throughout all of human history, have started because of crap just like the crap you ladies are flinging.
But if you would like to "Google" any war... anywhere, at any time and look how it started, maybe that would sped things up.
Unfortunately -- to sane thinking people it's not a remotely debatable point - but to the indoctrinated and perverted it's just another step on the path to domination.......
