Honest and open debate on gun control

[M14 Shooter]

You have done no such thing, and even if you had, it does not prove your claim.

Yes I have, and yes it does. If a thing does not exist it can't be used. You're bluffing, and I called your bluff.

I have a machine gun -- a Class-III M14 - for which I paid the transfer tax.
How does the fact that I - or anyone else with w legal class-III firearm - paid that tax prevent me from committing a crime with my M14?
Still waiting for an answer.

That's not what I said. What is your dysfunction?

You claimed that the tax stamp process prevents criminals from using machine guns in crime.
You may now answer my question.

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

 

[RKMBrown]

Yes I have, and yes it does. If a thing does not exist it can't be used. You're bluffing, and I called your bluff.

I have a machine gun -- a Class-III M14 - for which I paid the transfer tax.
How does the fact that I - or anyone else with w legal class-III firearm - paid that tax prevent me from committing a crime with my M14?
Still waiting for an answer.

That's not what I said. What is your dysfunction?

You claimed that the tax stamp process prevents criminals from using machine guns in crime.
You may now answer my question.

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I have a machine gun -- a Class-III M14 - for which I paid the transfer tax.
How does the fact that I - or anyone else with w legal class-III firearm - paid that tax prevent me from committing a crime with my M14?
Still waiting for an answer.

That's not what I said. What is your dysfunction?

You claimed that the tax stamp process prevents criminals from using machine guns in crime.
You may now answer my question.

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

 

[RKMBrown]

That's not what I said. What is your dysfunction?

You claimed that the tax stamp process prevents criminals from using machine guns in crime.
You may now answer my question.

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

Liar. I proved support for my claims. As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up. Again, learn to quote people without changing the meanings of their statements.

The proof lied within the fact that you can't use a machine gun that does not exist. Or perhaps you can explain to us how you will use a machine gun that does not exist. What are you gonna do with your imaginary machine gun point your finger and say bang?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You claimed that the tax stamp process prevents criminals from using machine guns in crime.
You may now answer my question.

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

 

[RKMBrown]

Did I say that? Where? How about you learn to quote me instead of being a pussy.

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on being irrational?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You argue that the tax stamp process is why machine guns are virtually never used in crimes
You have done nothing ti support this claim; you cannot show how the tax stamp process in any way prevents people with machine guns from committing a crime.

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on being irrational?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

 

[RKMBrown]

And there you go again moving the goal posts to Pluto. Why don't you prove that you can't use a machine gun on the planet pluto.

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on being irrational?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

 

[M14 Shooter]

^^^^
Proof that you know you cannot support your claim.

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on being irrational?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Since you do not have the testicular fortitude to stand and deliver:

Post 741:

The reason machine guns are not used in crimes is because of the tax stamp process.

Tens of thousands of guns have been legally transferred to individuals under this process -- prove your claim that the tax stamp process is the reason these guns have not been used in crimes.

 

[RKMBrown]

As for your lies about what I said... yeah those were just pussy ass lies that you made up.

Yawn.
Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
Prove that premise.
Good luck.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on being irrational?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

-Restate your premise, just so we are clear. Copy and paste the original claim and cite the post number.
-Prove that premise.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You refuse to prove your claim because you know you cannot.
Fail: You.
Disagree?
Soundly respond to post # 850.

 

[2aguy]

Ah. So you cannot show how the tax stamp process prevents machine guns from being used in a crime.
Thank you.

That's a lie. I've already shown how the tax stamp process prevents certain machine guns from being used in certain crimes.

No you haven't.... have you defined "machine gun" yet....please so we can all be on the same page as to what you mean....

Yes, I have I linked to the definition being used by the tax stamp process. You can call it what you want, I'm using the government specified term.

How do you explain that AR-15s and AK Variants aren't used that often? Since they actually exist....and have no tax stamp requirement?

Ok, simple. AR-15 is type of rifle. Shoulder fired rifles and shot guns are not used often in the commission of felonies. Pistols are the gun type of of choice for the vast majority of felonies committed with a fire arm and also police shootings. Mostly because pistols are smaller they are easier to carry and conceal. This makes them the right weapon for close in uses. Where a rifle is more for shooting at a distance. That said, machine guns and sawed off shot guns are also very good for close in fights and smaller versions are also concealable. You'll note that the tax stamp process also killed the use of sawed off shotguns and machine pistols. There was a time in our colored past when the use of sawed off shot guns and machine guns saw an increase in use. Then the crack downs came.

Back to rifles... When you start talking about mass murders the percentage of use of rifles goes way up. See tower shooter in Austin TX.

really...that is the best you have to offer.......you know your idea is stupid, but you thought it was clever, and now that it was shown to be stupid....you will fight for it regardless how desperate that fight is..........

Why on earth would the tax stamp process limit the use of a sawed off shotgun? Did you really think that through...you can get a quality shot gun for about 300 dollars or less, back when I picked one up......and then you can cut the end off....how exactly did the tax stamp process stop crimnals from using a hack saw?

Really.....try a little harder.....

 

[2aguy]

I was at the gun store today...over 50 AR-15 style rifles on the walls or racks in plain sight......that didn't include the AK variants, or the lever action rifles, or the other rifles they had.....

So tell me how the tax stamp keeps them out of the hands of criminals?

 

[RKMBrown]

That's a lie. I've already shown how the tax stamp process prevents certain machine guns from being used in certain crimes.

No you haven't.... have you defined "machine gun" yet....please so we can all be on the same page as to what you mean....

Yes, I have I linked to the definition being used by the tax stamp process. You can call it what you want, I'm using the government specified term.

How do you explain that AR-15s and AK Variants aren't used that often? Since they actually exist....and have no tax stamp requirement?

Ok, simple. AR-15 is type of rifle. Shoulder fired rifles and shot guns are not used often in the commission of felonies. Pistols are the gun type of of choice for the vast majority of felonies committed with a fire arm and also police shootings. Mostly because pistols are smaller they are easier to carry and conceal. This makes them the right weapon for close in uses. Where a rifle is more for shooting at a distance. That said, machine guns and sawed off shot guns are also very good for close in fights and smaller versions are also concealable. You'll note that the tax stamp process also killed the use of sawed off shotguns and machine pistols. There was a time in our colored past when the use of sawed off shot guns and machine guns saw an increase in use. Then the crack downs came.

Back to rifles... When you start talking about mass murders the percentage of use of rifles goes way up. See tower shooter in Austin TX.

really...that is the best you have to offer.......you know your idea is stupid, but you thought it was clever, and now that it was shown to be stupid....you will fight for it regardless how desperate that fight is..........

Why on earth would the tax stamp process limit the use of a sawed off shotgun? Did you really think that through...you can get a quality shot gun for about 300 dollars or less, back when I picked one up......and then you can cut the end off....how exactly did the tax stamp process stop crimnals from using a hack saw?

Really.....try a little harder.....

How about FUCK YOU ya dumb ass piece of shit?

 

[RKMBrown]

I was at the gun store today...over 50 AR-15 style rifles on the walls or racks in plain sight......that didn't include the AK variants, or the lever action rifles, or the other rifles they had.....

So tell me how the tax stamp keeps them out of the hands of criminals?

You must be the dumbest human being on the planet.

 

[RKMBrown]

You refuse to prove your claim because you know you cannot.
Fail: You.
Disagree?
Soundly respond to post # 850.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

 

[2aguy]

I was at the gun store today...over 50 AR-15 style rifles on the walls or racks in plain sight......that didn't include the AK variants, or the lever action rifles, or the other rifles they had.....

So tell me how the tax stamp keeps them out of the hands of criminals?

You must be the dumbest human being on the planet.

Yeah says the stupid fuck who thinks tax stamps keep criminals from getting "machine" guns.......you sir, are the stupid fuck....

 

[2aguy]

No you haven't.... have you defined "machine gun" yet....please so we can all be on the same page as to what you mean....

Yes, I have I linked to the definition being used by the tax stamp process. You can call it what you want, I'm using the government specified term.

How do you explain that AR-15s and AK Variants aren't used that often? Since they actually exist....and have no tax stamp requirement?

Ok, simple. AR-15 is type of rifle. Shoulder fired rifles and shot guns are not used often in the commission of felonies. Pistols are the gun type of of choice for the vast majority of felonies committed with a fire arm and also police shootings. Mostly because pistols are smaller they are easier to carry and conceal. This makes them the right weapon for close in uses. Where a rifle is more for shooting at a distance. That said, machine guns and sawed off shot guns are also very good for close in fights and smaller versions are also concealable. You'll note that the tax stamp process also killed the use of sawed off shotguns and machine pistols. There was a time in our colored past when the use of sawed off shot guns and machine guns saw an increase in use. Then the crack downs came.

Back to rifles... When you start talking about mass murders the percentage of use of rifles goes way up. See tower shooter in Austin TX.

really...that is the best you have to offer.......you know your idea is stupid, but you thought it was clever, and now that it was shown to be stupid....you will fight for it regardless how desperate that fight is..........

Why on earth would the tax stamp process limit the use of a sawed off shotgun? Did you really think that through...you can get a quality shot gun for about 300 dollars or less, back when I picked one up......and then you can cut the end off....how exactly did the tax stamp process stop crimnals from using a hack saw?

Really.....try a little harder.....

How about FUCK YOU ya dumb ass piece of shit?

Wow...clever reply...........are always this clever....?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You refuse to prove your claim because you know you cannot.
Fail: You.
Disagree?
Soundly respond to post # 850.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting?

You refuse to prove your claim because you know you cannot.
Fail: You.
Disagree?
Soundly respond to post # 850.