Honest and open debate on gun control

[M14 Shooter]

Rights in private property are secured in State Constitutions with the express terms, acquire and possess; even in case of need for a posse.

You may not be a liar but you are as much an idiot as the OP.

Says he who knows he cannot soundly argue against said OP.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but diversion for your "gospel Truth" Cause?

 

[M14 Shooter]

983 posts, no sound response.

 

[danielpalos]

Why only complain about social spending on the least wealthy when it may benefit them and not social spending that merely denies and disparages our privileges and immunities.

 

[RKMBrown]

983 posts, no sound response.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

 

[2aguy]

983 posts, no sound response.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but propaganda and rhetoric on the part of gun lovers; some on the left, get it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

983 posts, no sound response.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

Hard not to laugh, isn't it?
988 posts, no sound response.

 

[danielpalos]

No honesty or openness on the part of gun lovers? too much "hard work" apparently; slackers.

This is a sovereign State's right regarding gun lovers and the police Power of a State that is secured by our Second Article of Amendment; registering for posse duty whenever it may be required, in exchange for keeping and bearing Arms in public venues; and, not Only that, avoiding posse duty should be as serious as avoiding jury duty.

Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Can gun lovers explain why it is not a necessary and proper use of the police power?

----
Lower our Tax Burden and end that involuntary income transfer by ending our War on Crime.

Only Bad Socialists and worse Capitalists have a War on Crime, paid for with the (other) Peoples' money.

 

[M14 Shooter]

990 posts, no sound response.
Will we get to 1000?
Betting so...

 

[danielpalos]

Posse comitatus.

 

[RKMBrown]

990 posts, no sound response.
Will we get to 1000?
Betting so...

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

 

[M14 Shooter]

993, still counting...

 

[danielpalos]

993, still counting...

I believe we could use better aqueducts and better roads; why not employ gun lovers who may present themselves before the Judicature for breaches of the domestic Tranquility and security of our free States, and lower our tax burden by returning more well regulated citizenry to the populace.

 

[RKMBrown]

993, still counting...

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

 

[danielpalos]

993, still counting...

and, still no honesty and openness on gun lovers' "one way street".

This is a sovereign State's right regarding gun lovers and the police Power of a State that is secured by our Second Article of Amendment; registering for posse duty whenever it may be required, in exchange for keeping and bearing Arms in public venues; and, not Only that, avoiding posse duty should be as serious as avoiding jury duty.

Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Can gun lovers explain why it is not a necessary and proper use of the police power?

----
Lower our Tax Burden and end that involuntary income transfer by ending our War on Crime.

Only Bad Socialists and worse Capitalists have a War on Crime, paid for with the (other) Peoples' money.

 

[M14 Shooter]

997 posts... almost to 1000....
And no sound response to the OP.

 

[danielpalos]

I gave you a sound response and my political position.

 

[RKMBrown]

997 posts... almost to 1000....
And no sound response to the OP.

Yes or no, can you or can you not use a machine gun that does not exist. This is not a hard question. Any rational person could answer this question. Why do you insist on deflecting? How many times have you been a pussy and deflected from every sound response?

 

[M14 Shooter]

And.... post 1000!
Not a single sound response to the OP.
Proof positive, as I figured.