Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 101,613
- 35,752
My bad I misread your first post, you are talking about the financial institutions not the ability for the tax to pay for the tuition costs.I think you are mistaken with these numbers... Sanders plan is addressing public college tuition. Total revenue for public universities was $391 billion... 20% of which was tuition making the tuition revenue $78.2 billion a year. ASSUMING Bernie raises 240 Billion a year from the Wall Street tax, he would have plenty to cover the tuition costs. The remaining he wants to use to relieve student debt and invest in equity gaps and minority communities.Sanders thinks it will raise $240 Billion a year which would fund his program. The numbers have been disputed by financial institutions as they say it doesn’t compensate for drops in the market which may be caused by the tax.Sanders plan is a tax on Wall Street speculation to pay for it.
That's hilarious!!!
How much is his "speculation tax" going to raise each year?
The bill calls for a tax of 0.5% for stocks, 0.1% for bonds, and 0.005% for derivatives. A $1,000 stock trade would be taxed $5, while a $1,000 trade in derivatives would be taxed $0.05.
Sanders thinks it will raise $240 Billion a year which would fund his program.
Our top 15 financial service companies had combined Net Income of about $165 billion for FY2018.
I'm sure a tax that raised $240 billion would have absolutely no impact on securities trading or employment.
I guess we could look at other successful examples of this type of tax from around the world......
oh, right, there aren't any. Every time it was tried it killed trading and raised next to no new revenue and was quickly repealed.
The Condition of Education - Postsecondary Education - Finances and Resources - Postsecondary Institution Revenues - Indicator May (2019)
Free College, Cancel Debt
ASSUMING Bernie raises 240 Billion a year from the Wall Street tax, he would have plenty to cover the tuition costs.
A tax 50% larger than the TOTAL PROFITS of the 15 largest US financial service companies, combined, would crush trading and all employment related to trading.
Tax revenues would fall. There would be no new revenues to pay for his giveaways.
The tax isn't on the PROFITS of the financial institutions it would be on the transactions made so investors would eat the majority of the costs.
The tax isn't on the PROFITS of the financial institutions it would be on the transactions made
Correct. And when you see how big the supposed receipts would be, dwarfing the profits of the financial firms, you realize that rather than just swallowing the expense, investors would stop trading or move trading offshore.
The job losses and reduction in market activity would result in little to no net revenue.