Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,715
- 1,400
If you talk about it in the right context. 60 Minutes needed the rating. Truth or integrity was not an issue.Yes, your theory that she's telling the truth because of the existence of an NDA is fallacious.That's only because Stormy Daniels isn't a public figure, and every word she has said hasn't been recorded. The bottom line is that she admitted she doesn't have a shred of proof for her allegations. No phone logs, not texts, no emails. Nothing.
Perhaps you didn't hear me the first time. I'll repeat.
THEN WHAT'S THE NDA FOR??
How exactly do you agree to not-disclose something that you claim "never happened"?
Can't have it both ways --- if there's no event, there's no NDA. If there's an NDA, then there was an event.
So --- what is the NDA for?
Hm?
Wrong, of course.
Well there we have it. The question being "if there's no event, what's the NDA for?" and the answer came in as:
"Wrong, of course".
Thanks for uh, clearing that one up.
You still can't answer the question.
*HOW* can you not-talk-about an event ------------------------ IF THERE IS NO EVENT TO NOT-TALK ABOUT?
Hm?
Fifth time now with no answer.
We sit, and we wait. Yum! Pretzels!