Stormy already admitted that she doesn't have a shred of evidence to support her claims. No texts, no phone logs, no emails. That's because it never happened.
Then what's the NDA for?
Hm?
What's that? Still can't hear you.
Pretty obvious from the timing- Trump's lawyer paid her to keep quiet right before the election- so what she said would not harm Trump's election.
Which would make it an illegal campaign contribution by Trump's lawyer- unless of course Trump actually paid him to do it.
Then Trump would have broken the law.
That doesn't prove she is telling the truth, douchebag. She already demonstrated a willingness to slander Trump 7 years ago. Calling that a "campaign contribution" is a huge stretch. I doubt anyone can get the FEC to make such a ruling.
Really douchebag? When did she 'slander' Trump? Remember the truth is always a defense against slander.
Just because Trump says it never happened- doesn't prove she is telling the truth. With Trump's track record of honesty, it actually makes it less likely.
As far as a campaign contribution- if someone had paid her $130,000 to go public with her story right before the election- in order to harm Trump's election chances- that would be the same thing- and yeah it would be an illegal campaign contribution.
You Trump douchebags are all the same- anything for your Dear Leader.
You snowflake turds never seem to get this: Trump doesn't have to prove she is lying. She has to prove she isn't. She's the one making the claims.
No- you snowflake turd Trumpsters never seem to understand- well anything.
She doesn't have to prove anything- other than the NDA should be void. Voiding or upholding the NDA doesn't mean that either she or Trump are truthful- only that the NDA is void or it isn't.
She doesn't have to prove that she had sex with Trump nor does Trump have to prove she didn't.
But if it comes down to her word versus his? Well again he has a much longer and well established track record of lying- big and small lies.