Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't matter what side did it, does it or would do it in the future, because it shouldn't be allowed for government officials to use it's power to shut people up for political agenda's or reasoning. That's banana Republic stuff."Navaroli testified that her supervisors told her and her team that the platform received “something of a request” from Trump to take down a tweet that Teigen posted criticizing him.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who was questioning Navaroli when she confirmed that, said Trump “heckled” Teigen and her husband, singer John Legend, on Twitter in September 2019, calling them “the musician John Legend and his filthy-mouthed wife.”
He noted that Teigen responded to that post shortly after, calling Trump a “p—- ass bitch.”
“In that particular instance, I do remember hearing that we had received a request from the White House to make sure that we evaluated this tweet and that they wanted it to come down because it was a derogatory statement directed toward the president,” Navaroli said."
Trump asked Twitter to take down ‘derogatory’ tweet from Chrissy Teigen: whistleblower
When do the lawsuits start?
I am assuming we can count on your support.
This is why the Dems are called hypocrites.. lolWow...talk about OBLIVIOUS! In a "banana republic" the people in power use that power to jail their political opposition! Sound familar?
Fairness is subjective and impossible to assess on a macro level.Fairness is important wouldn't you say ?
No. It sounds like you want people running for office to be above the law.Wow...talk about OBLIVIOUS! In a "banana republic" the people in power use that power to jail their political opposition! Sound familar?
You really need to stop repeating silly bs. Those grand juries indicted trump.Wow...talk about OBLIVIOUS! In a "banana republic" the people in power use that power to jail their political opposition! Sound familar?
So why do you never attack republicans for doing it? I bet a quick search of your post history would uncover that hypocracy.It doesn't matter what side did it, does it or would do it in the future, because it shouldn't be allowed for government officials to use it's power to shut people up for political agenda's or reasoning. That's banana Republic stuff.
Let me be quite blunt, Cats! The ONLY thing that should bring charges against someone running for office is something extreme...you know like influence peddling where your family takes in twenty million in bribes? Questioning the results of an election is NOT a crime!No. It sounds like you want people running for office to be above the law.
Why wouldn't everyone run for president?
None of the indictments, that you evidently didn't read, are for questioning the results of an election.Let me be quite blunt, Cats! The ONLY thing that should bring charges against someone running for office is something extreme...you know like influence peddling where your family takes in twenty million in bribes? Questioning the results of an election is NOT a crime!
That's nothing like suppressing news and people talking about current events, which is what Google, Twitter, and"Navaroli testified that her supervisors told her and her team that the platform received “something of a request” from Trump to take down a tweet that Teigen posted criticizing him.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who was questioning Navaroli when she confirmed that, said Trump “heckled” Teigen and her husband, singer John Legend, on Twitter in September 2019, calling them “the musician John Legend and his filthy-mouthed wife.”
He noted that Teigen responded to that post shortly after, calling Trump a “p—- ass bitch.”
“In that particular instance, I do remember hearing that we had received a request from the White House to make sure that we evaluated this tweet and that they wanted it to come down because it was a derogatory statement directed toward the president,” Navaroli said."
Trump asked Twitter to take down ‘derogatory’ tweet from Chrissy Teigen: whistleblower
When do the lawsuits start?
I am assuming we can count on your support.
How many times do you have to be told? Joe didn’t have to receive ANY money directly. All he had to do was allow himself to be used so the rest of his corrupt family could extort $50 million from foreign adversaries, and there’s plenty of evidence to show he did that.None of the indictments, that you evidently didn't read, are for questioning the results of an election.
No proof Joe received any money illegally but if an indictment is laid against him by a grand jury, then I would support that.
"Nothing like" huh?That's nothing like supressing news and people talking anout current events, which is what Google, Twitter, and
Facebook did and are doing.
Hey Lisa. Hope all is well.How many times do you have to be told? Joe didn’t have to receive ANY money directly. All he had to do was allow himself to be used so the rest of his corrupt family could extort $50 million from foreign adversaries, and there’s plenty of evidence to show he did that.
NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY, dials in Daddy or Mommy when he is meeting with business partners. And Joe participated in that 20 times.
Yeah, "nothing like", you fucking Nazi!"Nothing like" huh?
Again, those private companies can post it not post anything they like.
"The author of the report, Cheyenne Hunt-Majer, told Insider she started experimenting with posts on Truth Social after hearing that people were getting kicked off the platform for expressing progressive or anti-Trump sentiments."
Truth social has every right to ban whatever they want.
LEFTIST PROG FUCKTARD RULES OF ENGAGEMENTHey Lisa. Hope all is well.
Can you link me the specific law you think was broken by Joe and the proof that supports that law being broken?
In your own words or a link is great too.
Thanks.
Ahh, the pretzel logic for justification along with some ad hominem.Yeah, "nothing like", you fucking Nazi!
Squelching news and people taking about it vs. picking sides in a petty personal squabble are two completely different things.
I'm actually not surprised your pinheaded ass doesn't grasp that, though.
You're pretty fuckin' stupid.
Ahh, the pretzel logic for justification along with some ad hominem.Yeah, "nothing like", you fucking Nazi!
Squelching news and people taking about it vs. picking sides in a petty personal squabble are two completely different things.
I'm actually not surprised your pinheaded ass doesn't grasp that, though.
You're pretty fuckin' stupid.
I can debate circles around your pinheaded ass. Bring it on!Ahh, the pretzel logic for justification along with some ad hominem.
You are too triggered for reasonable debate.
Get back to me when your meltdown is done.
Have a great day.
I’m in the car and will be back after 5 pm. I’ll do it then.Hey Lisa. Hope all is well.
Can you link me the specific law you think was broken by Joe and the proof that supports that law being broken?
In your own words or a link is great too.
Thanks.
No worries.I’m in the car and will be back after 5 pm. I’ll do it then.
Not anymore they can't, and the left caused it.Fairness is subjective and impossible to assess on a macro level.
Do you think the left and the right could actually agree on what is fair?
