House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

[toomuchtime_]

Two Republican committee chairmen on Capitol Hill are alleging that Hillary Clinton perjured herself during testimony to Congress last October when discussing her use of private email servers when she served as secretary of state.

In a letter sent to the Department of Justice on Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, and Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that Clinton's testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi contradicts the FBI's findings from its investigation into her private email servers.

"The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony," they wrote.

They said that the testimony that needs to be reviewed revolves around whether Clinton sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; whether there was more than one email server; and whether she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

The two Republicans said that in her testimony before the Benghazi panel on October 22, 2015, Clinton claimed that she didn't send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time. FBI Director James Comey, however, recently told Congress that there were three documents on an email server that were marked confidential. The State Department then said that some of those classification marking were the result of human error and didn't need to be on them.

They also said that Clinton claimed in her testimony that her lawyers reviewed all of her emails, but Comey told Congress in early July that they didn't individually review them. During her testimony, Goodlatte and Chaffetz said that Clinton said she only used one private email server, but the FBI found that there were "multiple devices." The two Republicans also said that Clinton did not provide all of her work-related emails to the Justice Department as she had testified.

• House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

Since this proves the integrity of the Obama Justice Department has been compromised by political considerations in this case, an independent prosecutor is needed to find our just how badly Clinton has comprised US national security.
Campaign 2016

 

[Timmy]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

 

[toomuchtime_]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

 

[Timmy]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The house republicans need to be voted out and thrown out on their ass. They don't give a damn about this nation....eff them.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

Doesn't matter. Once this is dismissed as partisan nonsense, they'll move on to something else.

 

[Iceweasel]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

How did they know? I understood it came in through official channels and got resent to her for her to send out. How would they know her private email address?

But it looks like the server was set up to hide the Clinton Foundation transactions. Why else would she risk it. 'She's not computer savvy' doesn't cut it, other people were involved.

 

[Timmy]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

How did they know? I understood it came in through official channels and got resent to her for her to send out. How would they know her private email address?

But it looks like the server was set up to hide the Clinton Foundation transactions. Why else would she risk it. 'She's not computer savvy' doesn't cut it, other people were involved.

You don't know where u are sending an email?


Righties act that HILLARY should know everything about thousands of emails when she is being grilled about it.

 

[Iceweasel]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

How did they know? I understood it came in through official channels and got resent to her for her to send out. How would they know her private email address?

But it looks like the server was set up to hide the Clinton Foundation transactions. Why else would she risk it. 'She's not computer savvy' doesn't cut it, other people were involved.

You don't know where u are sending an email?


Righties act that HILLARY should know everything about thousands of emails she is being grilled about it.

Righties never said that. And how was she getting her classified emails?

 

[Muhammed]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

And they should all be thrown in prison and/or executed if they were violating the espionage act.

 

[Muhammed]

The house republicans need to be voted out and thrown out on their ass. They don't give a damn about this nation....eff them.

Wrong. Crooked Hillary needs to be tried in federal court and hanged for committing treason after she is convicted.

She is a scumbag kunt. Why are you defending that piece of shit?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Two Republican committee chairmen on Capitol Hill are alleging that Hillary Clinton perjured herself during testimony to Congress last October when discussing her use of private email servers when she served as secretary of state.

In a letter sent to the Department of Justice on Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, and Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that Clinton's testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi contradicts the FBI's findings from its investigation into her private email servers.

"The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony," they wrote.

They said that the testimony that needs to be reviewed revolves around whether Clinton sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; whether there was more than one email server; and whether she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

The two Republicans said that in her testimony before the Benghazi panel on October 22, 2015, Clinton claimed that she didn't send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time. FBI Director James Comey, however, recently told Congress that there were three documents on an email server that were marked confidential. The State Department then said that some of those classification marking were the result of human error and didn't need to be on them.

They also said that Clinton claimed in her testimony that her lawyers reviewed all of her emails, but Comey told Congress in early July that they didn't individually review them. During her testimony, Goodlatte and Chaffetz said that Clinton said she only used one private email server, but the FBI found that there were "multiple devices." The two Republicans also said that Clinton did not provide all of her work-related emails to the Justice Department as she had testified.

• House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

Since this proves the integrity of the Obama Justice Department has been compromised by political considerations in this case, an independent prosecutor is needed to find our just how badly Clinton has comprised US national security.
Campaign 2016

Another lie contrived by the reprehensible right.

 

[bodecea]

Two Republican committee chairmen on Capitol Hill are alleging that Hillary Clinton perjured herself during testimony to Congress last October when discussing her use of private email servers when she served as secretary of state.

In a letter sent to the Department of Justice on Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, and Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that Clinton's testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi contradicts the FBI's findings from its investigation into her private email servers.

"The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony," they wrote.

They said that the testimony that needs to be reviewed revolves around whether Clinton sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; whether there was more than one email server; and whether she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

The two Republicans said that in her testimony before the Benghazi panel on October 22, 2015, Clinton claimed that she didn't send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time. FBI Director James Comey, however, recently told Congress that there were three documents on an email server that were marked confidential. The State Department then said that some of those classification marking were the result of human error and didn't need to be on them.

They also said that Clinton claimed in her testimony that her lawyers reviewed all of her emails, but Comey told Congress in early July that they didn't individually review them. During her testimony, Goodlatte and Chaffetz said that Clinton said she only used one private email server, but the FBI found that there were "multiple devices." The two Republicans also said that Clinton did not provide all of her work-related emails to the Justice Department as she had testified.

• House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

Since this proves the integrity of the Obama Justice Department has been compromised by political considerations in this case, an independent prosecutor is needed to find our just how badly Clinton has comprised US national security.
Campaign 2016

Well then, they'd better indict her then, eh? Or are they just whiny bitches?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Two Republican committee chairmen on Capitol Hill are alleging that Hillary Clinton perjured herself during testimony to Congress last October when discussing her use of private email servers when she served as secretary of state.

In a letter sent to the Department of Justice on Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, and Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that Clinton's testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi contradicts the FBI's findings from its investigation into her private email servers.

"The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony," they wrote.

They said that the testimony that needs to be reviewed revolves around whether Clinton sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; whether there was more than one email server; and whether she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

The two Republicans said that in her testimony before the Benghazi panel on October 22, 2015, Clinton claimed that she didn't send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time. FBI Director James Comey, however, recently told Congress that there were three documents on an email server that were marked confidential. The State Department then said that some of those classification marking were the result of human error and didn't need to be on them.

They also said that Clinton claimed in her testimony that her lawyers reviewed all of her emails, but Comey told Congress in early July that they didn't individually review them. During her testimony, Goodlatte and Chaffetz said that Clinton said she only used one private email server, but the FBI found that there were "multiple devices." The two Republicans also said that Clinton did not provide all of her work-related emails to the Justice Department as she had testified.

• House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

Since this proves the integrity of the Obama Justice Department has been compromised by political considerations in this case, an independent prosecutor is needed to find our just how badly Clinton has comprised US national security.
Campaign 2016

What according to.the dorks.on.here, she was cleared of everything she's ever.done. I'm shocked, shocked she would perjury herself like her husband did

 

[buckeye45_73]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

And she set up the server why?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

No, what you and others on the right are advocating is the presumption of guilt absent evidence in support, where one must ‘prove’ his innocence.

Your contempt for the rule of law is as repulsive as your contempt for the truth.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

Let's see, she had classified emails and "forgot" if she sent them or not? Don't you think that's a bit irresponsible? Don't you think that if one had sensitive or classified material, they would not only remember it until the day they die, but protect it with their life?

If that's the case, obviously she doesn't take such matters seriously. When it comes to the security or protection of this nation, you have to take it seriously, just like the guy standing behind Biden who has the code for our nuclear armaments.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Think about this .

You'd have to prove she knew about every one of these thousands of emails and remembered the handful that supposaably were marked secret.

No chance. Being mistaken is not equal to perjury .

So you are saying she is innocent by reason of incompetence.

In a way . She's not computer savy that's for sure .

But think about it. You would have to charge everyone who emailed her with a crime . They knew they were emailing outside the local server.

No, only the ones who gave false testimony under oath.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

shouldnt Hillary be grilled just for being sexually attracted to Huma?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Two Republican committee chairmen on Capitol Hill are alleging that Hillary Clinton perjured herself during testimony to Congress last October when discussing her use of private email servers when she served as secretary of state.

In a letter sent to the Department of Justice on Monday, House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia, and Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that Clinton's testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi contradicts the FBI's findings from its investigation into her private email servers.

"The evidence collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony," they wrote.

They said that the testimony that needs to be reviewed revolves around whether Clinton sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; whether there was more than one email server; and whether she provided all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

The two Republicans said that in her testimony before the Benghazi panel on October 22, 2015, Clinton claimed that she didn't send or receive emails that were marked classified at the time. FBI Director James Comey, however, recently told Congress that there were three documents on an email server that were marked confidential. The State Department then said that some of those classification marking were the result of human error and didn't need to be on them.

They also said that Clinton claimed in her testimony that her lawyers reviewed all of her emails, but Comey told Congress in early July that they didn't individually review them. During her testimony, Goodlatte and Chaffetz said that Clinton said she only used one private email server, but the FBI found that there were "multiple devices." The two Republicans also said that Clinton did not provide all of her work-related emails to the Justice Department as she had testified.

• House Republicans: Hillary Clinton committed perjury in emails testimony

Since this proves the integrity of the Obama Justice Department has been compromised by political considerations in this case, an independent prosecutor is needed to find our just how badly Clinton has comprised US national security.
Campaign 2016

Well then, they'd better indict her then, eh? Or are they just whiny bitches?

It would be up to the Obama Justice Department to indict her, but since we all know it has been compromised by political considerations, it is necessary to name an independent prosecutor to determine the extent of Hillary's crimes and the damage she has done to our national security.