Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No UNSC member state has put forward a motion that could pass. America's terms demand the return of all the Ukraine's former lands, and that can never happen of courseI don’t agree. But let’s say you’re right. Yiur position doesn’t really answer the question:
Why is the UN all about demanding a “truce” in the Israeli/Hamas fighting, but not demanding one in Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine?
False.The UN you mention is its members and the motion for peace talks was approved by all members except the US. Britain could only abstain.
When America vetoes it will always be a veto against peace or an humanitarian motion.False.
It wasn’t a motion for “peace talks,” you absolutely dishonest hack.
Putin has no say on the Ukraine becoming a part of Nato.I'd be for a permanent cease fire (Korea style) right now in Ukraine along the border as it stands right now, so long as Ukraine is allowed in Nato and Nato troops are on Russia's border. I don't think Putin would like that, though.
Well, Nato may be hesitating because of Russia.Putin has no say on the Ukraine becoming a part of Nato.
Nato itself is preventing that.
Another Canuck Fuck lie.When America vetoes it will always be a veto against peace or an humanitarian motion.
Britain only had the stomach to abstain.
America always stands for war and against a ceasefire., or any humanitarian efforts by the UN.Another Canuck Fuck lie.
The United States vetoed the proposed resolution because it demanded a “cease fire.” When a nation is at war against a ceaseless existential threat, demanding that it “cease fire” serves solely to allow the bad-acting aggressor to reinforce itself with arms and supplies.
Hurry back with more of your idiotic and completely unpersuasive bits of propaganda. You shithead.
BasicallySomehow it comes down to the obvious.
Jews. The anti Semites demand ceasefires whenever Israel has the nerve to defend itself.
Repeating your rancid and exposed dishonest propaganda isn’t persuasive, you stupid fuck.America always stands for war and against a ceasefire., or any humanitarian efforts by the UN.
Something different with this war from America's 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2 is that America now stands alone.
Each of your statements is a logical contradiction of the previous one:Well, Nato may be hesitating because of Russia.
But I think the OP is missing the fact that Ukraine and Gaza are two distinctly different situations. Ukraine is a PROXY war between Nato and Russia. If Russia can defeat Ukraine, then Nato and the US is weaker both in europe and the world. That is the ENTIRE point of Putin's territorial expansion that is not limited to Ukraine, but looks next to the Baltics.
Trump supports that. And for that reason I support anyone who can possibly beat Trump. (Go little nikki)
Whatever Gaza may be, it's not a proxy war. The Palestinians are pretty much on their own, and it's not going to work well for them.
You do understand that Ukraine is a proxy war and Gaza is not?Each of your statements contradicts the previous one.
The rest of the world attempted to get peace talks approved at the UNSC, but America vetoed the resolution alone.
So you don't. byeYou do understand that Ukraine is a proxy war and Gaza is not?
False equivalency. Who says they’re the same groups?Let's hear from those who think a ceasefire in Gaza is good, but a ceasefire in Ukraine is bad. What is the difference?
Why should Ukraine be allowed into Nato exactly?I'd be for a permanent cease fire (Korea style) right now in Ukraine along the border as it stands right now, so long as Ukraine is allowed in Nato and Nato troops are on Russia's border. I don't think Putin would like that, though.
Ps, and I'm for Russians out of Ukraine and illegal aliens out of the US ... assuming we can still have some guest workers to mow lawns and harvest veggies and slaughter livestock.
