Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.Yeah. I don't get the 'invasion' mentality at all. If we're really being invaded, we should focus on annihilating the enemy, not building walls to hide behind.
Japan is not replacing its own population with invaders. A smart move by any metric.
Um, not really. Right now, they don't have enough working folks to support the people who are too old to work.
If you can't see that the invaders have massively different interests from Americans, you are blind.
funny, most immigrants I know want to learn english and work jobs.
It was very stupid to not make more Japanese babies, that I agree with. Maybe stop killing the babies? The solution is not to replace the Japanese people with invaders. The old will have to do with less for supporting the stupidity.
The United States fell below replacement levels of fertility back in the late 1980s. Without immigration our population would be on the decline as well.
You say that like it is bad thing. Why?
The same reason it is a growing crisis in most developed countries, dumbass.
Yeah. I don't get the 'invasion' mentality at all. If we're really being invaded, we should focus on annihilating the enemy, not building walls to hide behind.
Invasion is going someplace where you are not permitted to go. So how is it not an invasion?
Pathetic chickenshit.
Oh please, obviously you speak from a position of solidarity and nothing more. If it were any other group outside of your own, you'd be on our side of this issue.
What “group” are you imagining for me, idiot? What is “our side “?
By your replies and avatar, I'm assuming you are a minority yourself. Our side means Americans who don't want to surrender our country to foreigners. Because once this place is gone, there is no other America to move to.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.Yeah. I don't get the 'invasion' mentality at all. If we're really being invaded, we should focus on annihilating the enemy, not building walls to hide behind.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.Yeah. I don't get the 'invasion' mentality at all. If we're really being invaded, we should focus on annihilating the enemy, not building walls to hide behind.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.Yeah. I don't get the 'invasion' mentality at all. If we're really being invaded, we should focus on annihilating the enemy, not building walls to hide behind.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
You have to admit the question "how can WHITE Americans be Democrats" is hilarious.How Can White Americans Be Democrats ?
It's the whites Republicans don't want:
gays
liberals
teachers
college professors
scientists
atheists
women who don't want their bodies legislated
See what I mean?
It's so obvious.
I'm embarrassed to have to explain.
Oh please, obviously you speak from a position of solidarity and nothing more. If it were any other group outside of your own, you'd be on our side of this issue.
What “group” are you imagining for me, idiot? What is “our side “?
By your replies and avatar, I'm assuming you are a minority yourself....
You make assumptions because you’re a dimwit.
No, but if it walks like a duck......quacks like a duck.........
You are just plain stupid.
You have to admit the question "how can WHITE Americans be Democrats" is hilarious.How Can White Americans Be Democrats ?
It's the whites Republicans don't want:
gays
liberals
teachers
college professors
scientists
atheists
women who don't want their bodies legislated
See what I mean?
It's so obvious.
I'm embarrassed to have to explain.
Republicans are so racist they can't imagine whites who aren't.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.So 77 countries around the world have it wrong ? And when double fences went up in El Paso, Yuma, and San Diego, illegal alien apprehensions didn't go down 90%. Fact is, they did.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
Japan is 98.7% JAPANESE.That will change very quickly.People from Third World countries will be allowed in and given the opportunity to work under this legislation, whether a cowardly weakling like you likes it or not. Not every Third World country is so defined by whatever categories scare you personally the most. Your personal fear and weakness is your own problem to work out with your own shrink.
Japan will understand that their culture is no better at protecting itself than western cultures once they have barbarians inside their gates and they will kick them out.
Relax, chickenshit. Japan has Long had an immigrant population, they are just allowing somewhat more in the face of a demographic challenge.
Their immigrant population is less than minuscule.
The average person in Japan is FAR RIGHT on immigration. Both the left and the right are far right on immigration in Japan.
You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about. You just think you can apply any of your notions because it’s that far away place over there. You are completely ignorant about what you’re trying to talk about. Views on immigration are changing as the reality of demographics becomes more and more apparent and immediate. Just as it will be an all developed countries very soon.
We provided you with facts. ...s!
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
No, they won't get tired, they just won't try to get in. It's worked every place else and even here in the US.
Nobody wants to build a wall for us to hide behind, we are building a wall to keep others out. You don't have a fence on your property because you hate everybody outside of it, you have a fence on your property to protect those within.
So, no. I'm not even sure what you're going on about here. I was merely pointing out that it's not an invasion. And if it were, a wall would be a cowardly response.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
I am sure that the first thing you do if someone were shooting at you is stand out in the middle of the street like the dumbass you are!
I guess that why forts in the Old West had walls. Our troops were simply cowards.
You know that the Trojans thought that is exactly what the Greeks did when they left them the Trojan Horse. They thought they left, Too bad it didn't work out well for them.
Japan is 98.7% JAPANESE.That will change very quickly.
Japan will understand that their culture is no better at protecting itself than western cultures once they have barbarians inside their gates and they will kick them out.
Relax, chickenshit. Japan has Long had an immigrant population, they are just allowing somewhat more in the face of a demographic challenge.
Their immigrant population is less than minuscule.
The average person in Japan is FAR RIGHT on immigration. Both the left and the right are far right on immigration in Japan.
You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about. You just think you can apply any of your notions because it’s that far away place over there. You are completely ignorant about what you’re trying to talk about. Views on immigration are changing as the reality of demographics becomes more and more apparent and immediate. Just as it will be an all developed countries very soon.
We provided you with facts. ...s!
What facts, supporting what claim?
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
I am sure that the first thing you do if someone were shooting at you is stand out in the middle of the street like the dumbass you are!
I guess that why forts in the Old West had walls. Our troops were simply cowards.
You know that the Trojans thought that is exactly what the Greeks did when they left them the Trojan Horse. They thought they left, Too bad it didn't work out well for them.
Not an invasion.
Um, not really. Right now, they don't have enough working folks to support the people who are too old to work.
funny, most immigrants I know want to learn english and work jobs.
It was very stupid to not make more Japanese babies, that I agree with. Maybe stop killing the babies? The solution is not to replace the Japanese people with invaders. The old will have to do with less for supporting the stupidity.
The United States fell below replacement levels of fertility back in the late 1980s. Without immigration our population would be on the decline as well.
You say that like it is bad thing. Why?
The same reason it is a growing crisis in most developed countries, dumbass.
OK, so how is it a crisis? You don't know do you? That is why you keep dodging the question.
Indeed, it's hard to believe that the second biggest party of the country stands for replacement of its own citizens and discrimination against majority of its citizens... in short genocide of its own population.
In Japan, they probably can't believe it.
A wall is a cowardly response? Let's go back to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Is that still recent enough for you?
The Iraqis fortified their border with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by building the opposite of walls, They excavated ditches to prevent our tanks and troops easy access to their land.
Is that a cowardly response or good tactical military decision?
If we were as weak as the Iraqis and we were really facing an invasion, I suppose it might make sense. But neither of those things is true, so yes, it's cowardly. And kind of pathetic.
Thank you for just proving how truly great a dumbass you are!
At the time, the Iraqis had the third largest Army in the world.
LOL... yes. You're right. We should hide behind a wall if we're being invaded. The invaders will eventually get tired and go home.
No, they won't get tired, they just won't try to get in. It's worked every place else and even here in the US.
Nobody wants to build a wall for us to hide behind, we are building a wall to keep others out. You don't have a fence on your property because you hate everybody outside of it, you have a fence on your property to protect those within.
Still not an invasion. Your kid fears are spinning out of control.
It was very stupid to not make more Japanese babies, that I agree with. Maybe stop killing the babies? The solution is not to replace the Japanese people with invaders. The old will have to do with less for supporting the stupidity.
The United States fell below replacement levels of fertility back in the late 1980s. Without immigration our population would be on the decline as well.
You say that like it is bad thing. Why?
The same reason it is a growing crisis in most developed countries, dumbass.
OK, so how is it a crisis? You don't know do you? That is why you keep dodging the question.
Are you really this stupid?
