How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America

This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
You know a mom, who had a child with a man could probably just stay at home and watch the child herself. Or maybe he would do it, or possibly they both could!
LOL.
"65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care."
Kind of hard when wages are stagnant.
Is that supposed to be a statistic? Sounds like a left wing idiot wrote it specifically to not say anything.
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.
 
The resident right wing circlejerkers have taken the thread with irrelevant ad homs, falsehoods, and stupidity. They're a cancer on this site.

trolling your own thread...again...


go do your homework, scooter..
I'm trolling my own thread? You're the idiots who came in and started spouting false ad-homs. It's fine if you do that if you actually address the fucking thread.
no ad homs from me
but..I see your "tactic".....the standard progressive excuse.."Somebody else did it first so I had to do it too"..LMAO..
 
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..


If he cares about getting one parent to stay home then we should raise the minimum wage and tariff imports to force jobs that pay well back here.
 
The resident right wing circlejerkers have taken the thread with irrelevant ad homs, falsehoods, and stupidity. They're a cancer on this site.

trolling your own thread...again...


go do your homework, scooter..
I'm trolling my own thread? You're the idiots who came in and started spouting false ad-homs. It's fine if you do that if you actually address the fucking thread.
no ad homs from me
but..I see your "tactic".....the standard progressive excuse.."Somebody else did it first so I had to do it too"..LMAO..
No ad homs? Yeah, whatever. I'm fine with ad homs, if you bother to contribute something relevant in the same post.
 
These nutters don't care about children, they only care about the fetus.
Seems that way, I give them every opportunity to try to express some sort of emotional care for kids.. like this thread. They fail.
 
You know a mom, who had a child with a man could probably just stay at home and watch the child herself. Or maybe he would do it, or possibly they both could!
LOL.
"65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care."
Kind of hard when wages are stagnant.
Is that supposed to be a statistic? Sounds like a left wing idiot wrote it specifically to not say anything.
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.


But hell, the profit for the corporations have gone through the effin roof. But, the loserterians don't care if we lose our middle class. It all comes back to I HATE GOVERNMENT and fuck you!!!!! Fuck you little guy!!!
 
You know a mom, who had a child with a man could probably just stay at home and watch the child herself. Or maybe he would do it, or possibly they both could!
LOL.
"65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care."
Kind of hard when wages are stagnant.
Is that supposed to be a statistic? Sounds like a left wing idiot wrote it specifically to not say anything.
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.

Word games and semantic distortion...it's not what YOU call yourself that matters...the positions you've been told to adopt and support are the measure..
 
These nutters don't care about children, they only care about the fetus.
Seems that way, I give them every opportunity to try to express some sort of emotional care for kids.. like this thread. They fail.


They don't care about anyone or thing besides the riches 1%. They're clearly mentally insane!
 
LOL.
"65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care."
Kind of hard when wages are stagnant.
Is that supposed to be a statistic? Sounds like a left wing idiot wrote it specifically to not say anything.
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.

Word games and semantic distortion...it's not what YOU call yourself that matters...the positions you've been told to adopt and support are the measure..
Yes, pewresearch is obviously brainwashing us with leftist propaganda..
 
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..
the 2 working parents was your idea fucknut, not ours.

stunned that you can't own up to your own idealistic failures.

but you can fix it, this time it's gotta work!
 
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..
the 2 working parents was your idea fucknut, not ours.

stunned that you can't own up to your own idealistic failures.

but you can fix it, this time it's gotta work!
What. the. fuck.?
 
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..


If he cares about getting one parent to stay home then we should raise the minimum wage and tariff imports to force jobs that pay well back here.
If you had an IQ you'd understand how dumb that was to say.
 
Is that supposed to be a statistic? Sounds like a left wing idiot wrote it specifically to not say anything.
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.

Word games and semantic distortion...it's not what YOU call yourself that matters...the positions you've been told to adopt and support are the measure..
Yes, pewresearch is obviously brainwashing us with leftist propaganda..

you believe everything your told...as long as it lines up with what you BELIEVE...

All media is propaganda and it especially targets young, naive, inexperienced people because they are the most emotional and haven't learned to be discerning yet...when you grow up you'll start to understand how the real world works.
 
That's a statistic, and wages have been stagnant for decades, both parents have to work these days, in many cases,to make ends meet with rising prices..

you have no idea or experience.just repeating things you read.....more marxist doubletalk
For most workers, real wages have barely budged for decades
I'm not a marxist, keep up the stupidity though.

Word games and semantic distortion...it's not what YOU call yourself that matters...the positions you've been told to adopt and support are the measure..
Yes, pewresearch is obviously brainwashing us with leftist propaganda..

you believe everything your told...as long as it lines up with what you BELIEVE...

All media is propaganda and it especially targets young, naive, inexperienced people because they are the most emotional and haven't learned to be discerning yet...when you grow up you'll start to understand how the real world works.
:cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
Simply supporting civilization is seen as evil to a loserterian. They're a bunch of hunter gathers that live deep in the woods.

They hate schools
They hate science instittions
They hate helping the poor or the old
They hate helping parents with children
They hate government
And goddamn they're going to demand that we all bow to the corporation!!!
 
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..

It's all so black and white in your world.

Liberal progressive socialist = good
Conservative = BAD

How nice. How dumb......

:rofl:
This worries me, we need to expand our help given to families with children, the article shows some proposals:
How Child Care Is Becoming A Crisis In America
Child care is both an economic necessity and barrier to employment for most families:
65 percent of children under six have either both parents or a single parent in the workforce. At the same time, most working parents encounter significant barriers to finding affordable, high-quality child care.

The cost of child care is increasing squeezing middle class families and has become unaffordable for many low-income families. Child care is a major household cost and it is increasingly eating up a larger portion of the family budget. The average annual cost of full-time care in a center is over $10,000, with some areas topping $16,000. Between 2000 and 2012, a typical middle class family saw child care expenses rise by $2,300 while wages remained stagnant. The situation is even more dire for families living in poverty; among those that pay for child care, they spend over one-third of total income on child care.

Perhaps because so many families face the need for child care and the inability to pay for it, improving access to quality, affordable child care is shaping up to be a key issue in the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton has called child care a critical economic issue and proposes making “quality, affordable child care” a national priority. Bernie Sanders recently criticized the current approach to child care as inadequate and called on better training and pay for child care providers. Likewise, Martin O’Malley proposes increasing access to safe and affordable child care as a means to closing the opportunity gap for future generations. As the election grows closer, Republicans will also need to address this growing burden for families.

In addition to cost constraints, parents are also likely to encounter few options for quality care, especially in low-income neighborhoods that are largely “service deserts” when it comes to finding good child care. High-quality child care often costs significantly more and may not be available in low-income or rural areas. Child care for infants under age one is especially hard to find and expensive, as young children require more intensive caregiving and specialized equipment like cribs.

The current child care subsidy system, funded through the Child Care and Development Block Grant, or CCDBG, provides an average annual benefit of $4,900 for a child care center which is rarely adequate for families to purchase high-quality child care. However, after decades of brain research we now know that children need access to nurturing and enriching environments from birth that support healthy development and early learning.
let me see if I understand;

leftist created the single parent - 2 working parents idea. Cons told them it would have the children, but they didn't give a fuck and said "war on women".

and now you have the ignorant fucking idea that you can fix what you broke by spending more money.

$18 Trillion in debt isn't enough for you idiots, you really want to destroy America from within with more and more "help" from the government.

do you have the slightest grasp of what will happen to all of us once that debt becomes way to much?

of course not, "war on women" "war on kids" and "You're a racist"
2 parents have to work to make ends meet since wages have been stagnant for decades, with a rising cost of living, thanks to cons not wanting to increase tax credits to families, etc, etc..
the 2 working parents was your idea fucknut, not ours.

stunned that you can't own up to your own idealistic failures.

but you can fix it, this time it's gotta work!

They just need another expensive government social program...why do you hate children?

:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top