How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[jc456]

. The Northwest in general is Milder than the Northeast

how does CO2 behave between the two regions? Do CO2 molecules get warmer?

 

[jc456]

What a science illiterate answer. The real one is, in the history of man on earth, the climate has never changed so RAPIDLY. OK, you’ve been ”edjacated” . Now stop making ignorant statements.

what happened to Pompei?

 

[jc456]

Science is never settled.

Debating that is an indefensible position.

come on Fueri, don't you know consensus????? The AGW crowd believes once there's consensus, science is over.

 

[jc456]

But then that



Yeah.......keep buying the lie.....give up your money, your freedom and your standard of living...so that the priests of the man made global warming religion can keep living in ocean front mansions....

NOAA...what a joke......let's play a game...which of their bureaucrats are not taking bribes from governments from around the 3rd world looking for 1st world hand outs....

again, why is it a money maker for those dictating?

 

[jc456]

You have a question ?

he did have question marks????????????? you don't even know what this means ???????? too fking funny

 

[jc456]

I am too old to be worried. Worry doesn't deal with problems anyway. I presume finding this was beyond your intellectual capacity.

View attachment 787333
This only goes to 2019. I am looking at 1965 to 2019. It is +1 deg C in 54 years and 3 years out of date. Are you happy now? Are you saying that you have never seen this graph before?

Global Temperature Report for 2019 - Berkeley Earth

We conclude that 2019 was the second warmest year on Earth since 1850.

berkeleyearth.org

what about 1800 to 1860?

 

[jc456]

But we pump more CO2 into the atmosphere changing where the equilibrium point would be.

what do two CO2 molecules in the atmosphere do when they radiate toward each other?

 

[jc456]

The differences in CO2 and temperature in the Ice Age cycles over 800,000 years has been 100 ppm and 5 deg C. We are already more than 100 ppm of CO2 over the peak so simple extrapolation implies 5 degrees above the normal peak

But according to AGW crowds, the 120 PPM of CO2 only increased temps. 1.0 C. Why wasn't it 5 degrees? YOu just wrote that 100PPM = 5 degrees C. You're math is confusing.

 

[jc456]

Yeah, implies! Not everything is linear.

You see in both the glacial and interglacial periods there was still lots of ice at the poles making sure that the tundra stayed frozen. But now Alaska and Russia are having problems with structures collapsing due to thawing permafrost.

Thawing permafrost releases methane which can only help the CO2. Implications can be a bitch!

that would imply if more CO2 is added then less temperature increase. Right?

 

[jc456]

As far as I know human beings did not exist that far back. The last time CO2 was this high was around 4 million years ago and it was coming down. There was no tundra.

how did permafrost melt if humans weren't involved?

 

[Dagosa]

what do two CO2 molecules in the atmosphere do when they radiate toward each other?

The answer to that question was posted twice. You’re an effin troll.

 

[Dagosa]

Feel free to post the steepest 54-year periods, for the non-illiterates.

Feel free to hold your breath.

So you never had a biology class in school ?

I've had several. You need to know about girls?

And failed everyone of them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Feel free to hold your breath.

And failed everyone of them.

Uranium still confusing you? LOL!

 

[Dagosa]

Uranium still confusing you? LOL!

You have yet to tell me how it got here ? You don’t know do you ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You have yet to tell me how it got here ? You don’t know do you ?

I told you. Did you forget your pills this morning? DURR

 

[Dagosa]

I told you. Did you forget your pills this morning? DURR

No you didn’t dufus . Never did. You can’t produce the quote can you ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No you didn’t dufus . Never did. You can’t produce the quote can you ?

The potential energy from uranium came from the gravitational energy of the sun.

Still hilarious!!!

 

[Dagosa]

The potential energy from uranium came from the gravitational energy of the sun.

Still hilarious!!!

100% correct. You can’t prove me wrong. Why? Because you don’t know what potential energy is. Go ahead, prove that statement is incorrect.

 

[Dagosa]

The potential energy from uranium came from the gravitational energy of the sun.

Still hilarious!!!

Still no reply. You can’t prove this is wrong can you ? You don’t know “ fizicks” do you ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still no reply. You can’t prove this is wrong can you ? You don’t know “ fizicks” do you ?

You still can't prove it is right? LOL!