gfm7175
Platinum Member
- Mar 22, 2019
- 657
- 469
- 920
No idea what you're even going on about here...And since your beliefs are not falsifiable, they are obviously religious in nature.
In stark contrast, our beliefs could be falsified by many types of hard data. Thus, they qualify as hard science.
Attempted Force of a Negative Proof Fallacy. I don't have to provide you anything.If you disagree, tell us what your theory of climate is, and then tell us what data could falsify it. If you state that you're not required to provide a theory, that will instantly qualify you as a wild-eyed religious zealot.
There is no such thing as a 'global climate'... Climate is typically defined as "weather in an area over a long period of time"... It is not quantifiable.