How much more democrat hypocrisy will the US take?

[Kondor3]

Alinsky would be so proud

But you forget: Alinsky is more than likely frying in Hell right now.

Maybe you leftists don't believe in Hell or certainly don't believe u will end up there?

Well, disbelieving in Hell must make it disappear, right?

I don't believe in the Hair Sniffer in Chief. Will he go away if I stop believing he is real?

Uhhhhh.... yeah..... right... is there a psychiatrist in the house? You've imbibed far too much Orange Kool-Aid... not all opponents of Rump are Leftists.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Did your 3x divorced orange blob tell you that?

No, Bill Clinton and other demscum told me that.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Uhhhhh.... yeah..... right... is there a psychiatrist in the house? You've imbibed far too much Orange Kool-Aid... not all opponents of Rump are Leftists.

All leftists love alinsky.

 

[struth]

What is obvious is that Trump had no respect for democracy.

Trump didn’t care how he won. He just wanted to win.

If he had no respect for democracy he wouldn't of cared how many more votes he needed.

 

[Marener]

what do you consider "substantially"?

29% Say U.S. Heading in Right Direction

Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey for the week ending September 29, 2022.

www.rasmussenreports.com

4 percent? hahahah

Right Direction or Wrong Track

Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey for the week ending October 12, 2023.

www.rasmussenreports.com

10%

 

[struth]

Right Direction or Wrong Track

Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey for the week ending October 12, 2023.

www.rasmussenreports.com

10%

hahah get back to me when you can do math

If 29 percent say we are on the "right track" that means 71 percent think we are on the wrong track...down 4 percent from 75 percent.

It's no wonder you vote for the dembot cult

 

[Marener]

If he had no respect for democracy he wouldn't of cared how many more votes he needed.

In this instance, he had no respect for democracy because he attempted to disenfranchise Americans without due process.

At a later date, he didn’t care how many votes he needed because he tried to persuade state representatives to disregard ALL votes and appoint electors for him.

 

[Billo_Really]

How much Democrat hypocrisy can America stand?

Liberals appear to be living in fear that conservatives might do what liberals have already done — time and again. Filled with the absolute certainty they are right (about everything), they continue to break their arms patting themse...

www.americanthinker.com

interesting question, I would also throw in the Bush/Cheney/McConnell jerks as well.

No, it is not the same thing when Republicans do it, because when Republicans do it, they do not back up their claims with evidence! Like the voter fraud issue, saying there was fraud, but never proving it.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[struth]

In this instance, he had no respect for democracy because he attempted to disenfranchise Americans without due process.

At a later date, he didn’t care how many votes he needed because he tried to persuade state representatives to disregard ALL votes and appoint electors for him.

1) nowhere did he say that....but Gore and the Dems did do that in 2000...read Bush v Gore
2) you mean, he wanted folks to exercise their rights to object to electors? Like Dems did in 2000, 2004 and 2016? Did Democrats Object the Last Three Times a Republican Won the White House?

Kirk is partially correct: The 2000, 2004, and 2016 presidential elections saw some congressional Democrats object to the final electoral count. In 2000, the New York Times reported that “a dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, joined by a few sympathizers, tried in vain to block the counting of Florida's 25 electoral votes, protesting that black voters had been disenfranchised.” While members of either chamber of Congress may object to the certification of a state’s electoral votes, without at least one supporter in both chambers such objections are not formally considered and do not go to debate. As such, the objection to Florida’s electoral votes in 2000 quickly failed without a senator joining the cause. The 2016 election certification faced similar objections from the House that failed to find a supporter in the Senate.

 

[Marener]

1) nowhere did he say that....but Gore and the Dems did do that in 2000...read Bush v Gore
2) you mean, he wanted folks to exercise their rights to object to electors? Like Dems did in 2000, 2004 and 2016? Did Democrats Object the Last Three Times a Republican Won the White House?

Kirk is partially correct: The 2000, 2004, and 2016 presidential elections saw some congressional Democrats object to the final electoral count. In 2000, the New York Times reported that “a dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, joined by a few sympathizers, tried in vain to block the counting of Florida's 25 electoral votes, protesting that black voters had been disenfranchised.” While members of either chamber of Congress may object to the certification of a state’s electoral votes, without at least one supporter in both chambers such objections are not formally considered and do not go to debate. As such, the objection to Florida’s electoral votes in 2000 quickly failed without a senator joining the cause. The 2016 election certification faced similar objections from the House that failed to find a supporter in the Senate.

1) He absolutely said it. He attempted to persuade the SOS to eliminate votes because it would help him. Those votes he wanted to throw away are people. They are citizens of the US with a constitutional right to chose their representatives and he wanted their rights taken away without any due process.

Gore didn’t do anything of the sort.

2) Nothing to do with the process of members of Congress objecting to state electors. He wanted state legislatures to ignore the votes of the people and chose their own electors. It’s absolutely egregious to think that a sitting president would be so brazenly anti-Democratic as to suggest taking away one of our most precious rights.

 

[struth]

1) He absolutely said it. He attempted to persuade the SOS to eliminate votes because it would help him. Those votes he wanted to throw away are people. They are citizens of the US with a constitutional right to chose their representatives and he wanted their rights taken away without any due process.

Gore didn’t do anything of the sort.

2) Nothing to do with the process of members of Congress objecting to state electors. He wanted state legislatures to ignore the votes of the people and chose their own electors. It’s absolutely egregious to think that a sitting president would be so brazenly anti-Democratic as to suggest taking away one of our most precious rights.

1) he never said anything about eliminating votes in the call. We have all seen the transcript.
---of course Gore did, hence why the SCOTUS said he violated the Due Process rights of the people of FL...or at least was trying to.

Dems Want to Toss 25,000 Absentee Votes

Dems Want to Toss 25,000 Absentee Votes

abcnews.go.com

2) If the objections were upheld, then the State would have new electors. That's how the process works. Nothing Trump did to challenge it was outside the process and perfectly legal. Hence why the Jan 6th Committee has recommended changing the law.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

who cares what happened in the 2020 election...it's been two years of a nightmare under the Demafascit and that's why 75 percent of the population thinks they have us headed in the wrong direction.

Your first sentence negates the second.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

SURE they were.

All you need to register to vote in Georgia, is a utility bill.




So what?




Says the people who cheat in elections.

You're not loyal to America, you're loyal to a bunch of dimwitted Stalinists

But, but, but... Stalinists!

 

[struth]

Your first sentence negates the second.

how so? the 75 percent poll is current..not from 2020

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

how so? the 75 percent poll is current..not from 2020

You say 'who cares' in the first sentence. Then you go on to explain exactly how much you do care. You idiots don't understand what words mean. Magaturd logic 101.

 

[struth]

You say 'who cares' in the first sentence. Then you go on to explain exactly how much you do care. You idiots don't understand what words mean. Magaturd logic 101.

I said nobody cares about 2020....we are talking about TODAY.

Geez.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I said nobody cares about 2020....we are talking about TODAY.

Geez.

Just saying you talk like a magaturd, and your shit's all retarded. Geez.

 

[Marener]

1) he never said anything about eliminating votes in the call. We have all seen the transcript.
---of course Gore did, hence why the SCOTUS said he violated the Due Process rights of the people of FL...or at least was trying to.

Dems Want to Toss 25,000 Absentee Votes

Dems Want to Toss 25,000 Absentee Votes

abcnews.go.com

2) If the objections were upheld, then the State would have new electors. That's how the process works. Nothing Trump did to challenge it was outside the process and perfectly legal. Hence why the Jan 6th Committee has recommended changing the law.

1) Gore wasn’t party to the lawsuit in your link. You should read your own stories. Also, a lawsuit is actually due process. Trump just asked Raffebsperger to toss tens of thousands of votes for him. Just do it. That’s not due process.

2) If the objections were upheld (which there never was any chance they would be) then the electoral votes from the states are disregarded. The state does not appoint new electors. Trump was requesting the legislatures to certify different electors because he asked them to. It was indeed outside the law.

 

[struth]

Just saying you talk like a magaturd, and your shit's all retarded. Geez.

I am sorry you lack reading comprehension skills