How Much Prison Time Should You Get For Having An Abortion?

Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?
The user should not go to jail, the dealer should.
The woman who wants an abortion should not go to jail. The Doctor who does an illegal abortion should. Not all abortions should be illegal.
 
. The law recognizes the fetus is not a human inside the mother's body.
Where do you come up with such nonsense? ...
So Jake, if the fetus isn't human?
Then what is it?? ... :dunno:
No one here has ever been able to show that a fetus is a human being in the eyes of the law.

You can't do that. You can't find that.
If it has a heartbeat Jake, its alive.

A heartbeat sustains life, without it, you have death

-Geaux
With that view, you must be a vegetarian.
 
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?

Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
 
The issue has never been about the woman’s body. That’s the lie you hide behind. It’s about the child’s constitutional rights to life.

An embryo is not a child. A sperm is not a child. An egg is not a child.
There are no "rights" offered to a growing mass of cells entirely dependent on the mother.
It would die immediately outside the womb.
And for the record, I am opposed to abortion after the first trimester unless the life of the mother is at risk.

Here, you'll enjoy this :cool:



An embryo with human dna is not life? Lol.


I didn't say it wasn't life. Of course it is life - so is an amoeba.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. In my view the women should be allowed to have the abortion. (With a Catch)
2. But what she doesn't know is she is the one who gets aborted, the baby is saved alive and she is put to death.
3. Wouldn't be long and abortions will end.
4. The baby is innocent, the women is not, its better the innocent baby live than the guilty women.
5. Legal abortion has been going for 45 years, after 45 years women get to choose to live as well as the baby, but in order for the women to live they must agree to be sterilized.
6. Baby is given away into adoption, and never to know his or her real mother.
7. Babies that mothers were aborted will be put in loving adopted couple hands.
8. The men who fathered the babies would have first right of refusal of the baby, to be a single parent, they would have to prove they can raise the child, (provide basic needs), in a loving home, (extended family too his mother and father), and can prove they are the father through DNA testing.
9. Its the best way to even things out and be fair to ALL.
10. Think about it, its fair and just.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?

Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.

Not this tired old shit. If you're against abortion, you hate children... what utter claptrap.
 
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?

Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.
 
Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.

Well it would appear that Donald has now adopted Obama's policies - catch and release for the most part.

Now they have absolutely NO clue how to reunite 2100 babies in cages with their parent(s).

Sad
 
So you double down on a false equivalency based on two disparate situations. OK.
So the choice for women to 'choose' what they do with their bodies has restrictions? If so, a different word needs used when justifying abortions

-Geaux

The core problem lies with what they are doing to another persons body. Killing it.



And don't forget their hobby.....harvesting organs of those aborted babies.

To think we work so hard to dehumanize the unborn in the name of defying what is natural and irrefutably human: responsibility to carry the child. So what do you want then? To escape being human?

I see it as one more arm of the Liberals octopus....the main aim of which is to uproot morality and tradition, end the family and erase religion from the public arena.

It is an enticement to being Liberal: make up your own morality....and ....as Charles Murray has written:

"One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, ..."

Charles Murray (White Nationalist)

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

For the record:

You must keep in mind that throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus has been presenting the nature of true righteousness as compared with the self righteousness seen in the Scribes and Pharisees of that time. The fruit Jesus is talking about is the fruit of righteousness as compared to the fruit of self righteousness.

Shame on you PC
 
Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.

Well it would appear that Donald has now adopted Obama's policies - catch and release for the most part.

Now they have absolutely NO clue how to reunite 2100 babies in cages with their parent(s).

Sad
DNA
 
So the choice for women to 'choose' what they do with their bodies has restrictions? If so, a different word needs used when justifying abortions

-Geaux

The core problem lies with what they are doing to another persons body. Killing it.



And don't forget their hobby.....harvesting organs of those aborted babies.

To think we work so hard to dehumanize the unborn in the name of defying what is natural and irrefutably human: responsibility to carry the child. So what do you want then? To escape being human?

I see it as one more arm of the Liberals octopus....the main aim of which is to uproot morality and tradition, end the family and erase religion from the public arena.

It is an enticement to being Liberal: make up your own morality....and ....as Charles Murray has written:

"One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, ..."

Charles Murray

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

For the record:

You must keep in mind that throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus has been presenting the nature of true righteousness as compared with the self righteousness seen in the Scribes and Pharisees of that time. The fruit Jesus is talking about is the fruit of righteousness as compared to the fruit of self righteousness.



41ynxquoDIL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg



Did you read it???


Of course not....you're a Liberal simpleton who take your orders from HamasNBC and the NYTimes.
 
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?

Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.


You harvest the organs of children….don’t tell me how concerned you are about children.
 
Wait a minute - Some are being prosecuted for taking a day after pill following unplanned for sex?
Killing an abortion doctor is murder and settled law.
Just wait Biff - if they turn this whole thing over to the states, we'll be reading story after story about young women dying because they didn't have the wherewithal to travel 500-1000 miles to a state where it's legal and they attempt on their own or in a back alley.
Good times! :rolleyes:

Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.


You harvest the organs of children….don’t tell me how concerned you are about children.

Indeed - This is the time I plant organs, then water and fertilize for a bountiful Fall harvest! :rolleyes-41:
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Children being dragged into the USA illegally are not equal to of even of a simular reality, the parents are breaking USA laws, and are dragging innocent children into a illegal situation which reflects badly on the parents, these children should be stripped away from their parents, and both should be sent back to their home lands, and they should be separated in their home lands too.
2. Dragging children illegally across borders should have harsh penalties, that should follow the parents back to their home lands.
3. But of course thats another topic.
4. Come to USA legally or come and suffer legal actions on your family.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.

Well it would appear that Donald has now adopted Obama's policies - catch and release for the most part.

Now they have absolutely NO clue how to reunite 2100 babies in cages with their parent(s).

Sad
DNA

Funny - a simple wristband with identifying number would have been easier.

But they didn't think that part through, primarily because they didn't give a crap.
 
It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.

Well it would appear that Donald has now adopted Obama's policies - catch and release for the most part.

Now they have absolutely NO clue how to reunite 2100 babies in cages with their parent(s).

Sad
DNA

Funny - a simple wristband with identifying number would have been easier.

But they didn't think that part through, primarily because they didn't give a crap.
That’s what makes them bad parents...
 
So the choice for women to 'choose' what they do with their bodies has restrictions? If so, a different word needs used when justifying abortions

-Geaux

The core problem lies with what they are doing to another persons body. Killing it.



And don't forget their hobby.....harvesting organs of those aborted babies.

To think we work so hard to dehumanize the unborn in the name of defying what is natural and irrefutably human: responsibility to carry the child. So what do you want then? To escape being human?

I see it as one more arm of the Liberals octopus....the main aim of which is to uproot morality and tradition, end the family and erase religion from the public arena.

It is an enticement to being Liberal: make up your own morality....and ....as Charles Murray has written:

"One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, ..."

Charles Murray (White Nationalist)

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

For the record:

You must keep in mind that throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus has been presenting the nature of true righteousness as compared with the self righteousness seen in the Scribes and Pharisees of that time. The fruit Jesus is talking about is the fruit of righteousness as compared to the fruit of self righteousness.

Shame on you PC

Oh yeah, I know Charles. He must be living proof that white people are inferior morons. :)
 
The core problem lies with what they are doing to another persons body. Killing it.



And don't forget their hobby.....harvesting organs of those aborted babies.

To think we work so hard to dehumanize the unborn in the name of defying what is natural and irrefutably human: responsibility to carry the child. So what do you want then? To escape being human?

I see it as one more arm of the Liberals octopus....the main aim of which is to uproot morality and tradition, end the family and erase religion from the public arena.

It is an enticement to being Liberal: make up your own morality....and ....as Charles Murray has written:

"One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, ..."

Charles Murray

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

For the record:

You must keep in mind that throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus has been presenting the nature of true righteousness as compared with the self righteousness seen in the Scribes and Pharisees of that time. The fruit Jesus is talking about is the fruit of righteousness as compared to the fruit of self righteousness.



41ynxquoDIL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg



Did you read it???


Of course not....you're a Liberal simpleton who take your orders from HamasNBC and the NYTimes.

I'm a liberal Democrat who graduated from CAL where I learned to think for myself, think outside of the box and to question authority.

You're a phony, and self righteous.
 
A fetus is not a "child", Funny, it would be nice if you cared about that "child" AFTER it is born.

But you put more value in a blob of cells entirely dependent on a mother for life, but shrug when Mango Mussolini rips an ACTUAL child out of the arms of their mother.

On that - You give not a whit.
If the mother commits a crime it would be wrong to incarcerate the kid with the mother. It would also be wrong to let her get away with the crime.

Well it would appear that Donald has now adopted Obama's policies - catch and release for the most part.

Now they have absolutely NO clue how to reunite 2100 babies in cages with their parent(s).

Sad
DNA

Funny - a simple wristband with identifying number would have been easier.

But they didn't think that part through, primarily because they didn't give a crap.
That’s what makes them bad parents...

That wasn't their job - It was Dear Donald's since he was the kidnapper.
 
And don't forget their hobby.....harvesting organs of those aborted babies.

To think we work so hard to dehumanize the unborn in the name of defying what is natural and irrefutably human: responsibility to carry the child. So what do you want then? To escape being human?

I see it as one more arm of the Liberals octopus....the main aim of which is to uproot morality and tradition, end the family and erase religion from the public arena.

It is an enticement to being Liberal: make up your own morality....and ....as Charles Murray has written:

"One change in societal attitude has been the “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental. As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, ..."

Charles Murray

Charles Murray (political scientist) - Wikipedia

For the record:

You must keep in mind that throughout the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus has been presenting the nature of true righteousness as compared with the self righteousness seen in the Scribes and Pharisees of that time. The fruit Jesus is talking about is the fruit of righteousness as compared to the fruit of self righteousness.



41ynxquoDIL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg



Did you read it???


Of course not....you're a Liberal simpleton who take your orders from HamasNBC and the NYTimes.

I'm a liberal Democrat who graduated from CAL where I learned to think for myself, think outside of the box and to question authority.

You're a phony, and self righteous.



The correct answer was 'no, I didn't read it.'


Can you name two or three tomes that inform your political views?
Or....admit that I am correct about the source:HamasNBC and the NYTimes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top