How Much Prison Time Should You Get For Having An Abortion?

Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.

No one benefits from an abortion. I take that back. Republicans use abortion as a wedge issue, never have and never will pass a vote for a Constitutional Amendment to make abortion illegal.

Q. Why

A. They value their job first, and any consideration for the fetus is at best a second thought. R's run on two things: wedge issues (God, Guns, Gays, Abortion and Taxes; and, BIG LIES.




“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.


a. And based on the above, every conservative is pro-life.



Your side:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky





Soooo.....when did you give up being a human being???
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.

No one benefits from an abortion. I take that back. Republicans use abortion as a wedge issue, never have and never will pass a vote for a Constitutional Amendment to make abortion illegal.

Q. Why

A. They value their job first, and any consideration for the fetus is at best a second thought. R's run on two things: wedge issues (God, Guns, Gays, Abortion and Taxes; and, BIG LIES.




“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.


a. And based on the above, every conservative is pro-life.



Your side:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky





Soooo.....when did you give up being a human being???

Their most effective strategy to rationalize abortion is dehumanization support groups.
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

Malice is expressed when there is manifested a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of a human being.

R v. W is the law of the land. Don't like it, ask your member of Congress to sponsor a bill to establish an amendment to COTUS outlawing abortion.
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

Malice is expressed when there is manifested a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of a human being.

R v. W is the law of the land. Don't like it, ask your member of Congress to sponsor a bill to establish an amendment to COTUS outlawing abortion.


1. As you were unable to name the political texts that informed your views, we've agreed that it is only the dictates of HamasNBC, and the NYSlimes, that do so.

And you stick to same like manure to a wet blanket.



2. Now, stop begging....you can have the same chance as the other dunce...

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.


I anticipate a second failure on your part....you're so experience in that realm.
 
Sure hasn't been good times for the 60 million plus babies that have been killed.

It is none of your business

It is when a child is killed such as abortion.

Who in the hell are you, figures a Texan.

A Texan who values and respects life.

its really none of your business who has an abortion. I know you Texans love to stick your nose in everyone business but the stay the heck out of it.

You never answered my question, are you will to support them? via, Hud, Snap, and Chip, any and all social programs. Health ins for the parents before have a baby, remember healthy people usually have healthy babies, so you must be for expanded Medicaid and the ACA??

Why would I support your irresponsible behavior?
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

Malice is expressed when there is manifested a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of a human being.

R v. W is the law of the land. Don't like it, ask your member of Congress to sponsor a bill to establish an amendment to COTUS outlawing abortion.


1. As you were unable to name the political texts that informed your views, we've agreed that it is only the dictates of HamasNBC, and the NYSlimes, that do so.

And you stick to same like manure to a wet blanket.



2. Now, stop begging....you can have the same chance as the other dunce...

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.


I anticipate a second failure on your part....you're so experience in that realm.

The issue is not political, it is legal. The definitions I posted explain the law, and we were a nation of law (at least before Trump was elected).

The answer to your foolish question is simple: within the law of R v. W an abortion is legal, and thus in the eyes of Lady Justice a right; in the latter case the wanton killing of a one year old is infanticide, something you would know if you owned and used a dictionary; it is not a right, it is a wrong.

I hope that clears it up for your simon, I can't make it any simpler than I did.
 
There is a huge disparity when it comes the termination of a pregnancy.

If a man assaults a woman and she has a miscarriage. He will be arrested, charged with murder, and receive prison time if convicted.

But if that same woman has an abortion. She will be hailed as a hero by the liberals for terminating the baby. .... :cuckoo:
Your first example leaves mourning friends and family.

Second example nobody cares...
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

Malice is expressed when there is manifested a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of a human being.

R v. W is the law of the land. Don't like it, ask your member of Congress to sponsor a bill to establish an amendment to COTUS outlawing abortion.


1. As you were unable to name the political texts that informed your views, we've agreed that it is only the dictates of HamasNBC, and the NYSlimes, that do so.

And you stick to same like manure to a wet blanket.



2. Now, stop begging....you can have the same chance as the other dunce...

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.


I anticipate a second failure on your part....you're so experience in that realm.

The issue is not political, it is legal. The definitions I posted explain the law, and we were a nation of law (at least before Trump was elected).

The answer to your foolish question is simple: within the law of R v. W an abortion is legal, and thus in the eyes of Lady Justice a right; in the latter case the wanton killing of a one year old is infanticide, something you would know if you owned and used a dictionary; it is not a right, it is a wrong.

I hope that clears it up for your simon, I can't make it any simpler than I did.



So you couldn't answer the question.


No shock.


Slither away.
 
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.


Let's examine that:

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

Caution:
....if this is the first time you've tried to think you could wind up with an aneurysm!

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.

Malice is expressed when there is manifested a deliberate intention to unlawfully take away the life of a human being.

R v. W is the law of the land. Don't like it, ask your member of Congress to sponsor a bill to establish an amendment to COTUS outlawing abortion.


1. As you were unable to name the political texts that informed your views, we've agreed that it is only the dictates of HamasNBC, and the NYSlimes, that do so.

And you stick to same like manure to a wet blanket.



2. Now, stop begging....you can have the same chance as the other dunce...

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.


I anticipate a second failure on your part....you're so experience in that realm.

The issue is not political, it is legal. The definitions I posted explain the law, and we were a nation of law (at least before Trump was elected).

The answer to your foolish question is simple: within the law of R v. W an abortion is legal, and thus in the eyes of Lady Justice a right; in the latter case the wanton killing of a one year old is infanticide, something you would know if you owned and used a dictionary; it is not a right, it is a wrong.

I hope that clears it up for your simon, I can't make it any simpler than I did.



So you couldn't answer the question.


No shock.


Slither away.

I'm very sorry simon, I tried to dumb it down for you and failed. Mea culpa, I need to practice talking down to you. I'll try very hard to keep my comments very simple and down to a level which you might understand.

I'd practice with Roxy, our Border Collie, but alas, she's much more intelligent than you, and much nicer too.
 
Give it some deep thought and ask yourself who benefits most from abortion. The shallow opinion is that poor women benefit because it's one less mouth to feed but that ain't necessarily true. Women who undergo abortion are often plagued with PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives. Liberal media types would never focus on it because it's mostly liberal men who benefit from abortion when their future responsibilities are ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The racist aspect is also noteworthy. Black women are in the minority but they are most likely to have abortions. The godmother of abortion, Margaret Sanger, was a proponent of a theory called "eugenics" and so were liberal democrats like Wilson and socialist nationalists like Hitler. It's possible that white racist democrats keep the abortion mill running as a subtle form of ethnic cleansing.
You are dead wrong. I know women who have had abortions and the one emotion they all said they had was relief. Years later, not one of them has any regrets. You're just spouting the same RW propaganda that has been debunked over and over.
Every month that a fertile woman allows to pass without getting pregnant is a decision to not have another human on earth. Deciding for her what her bodily processes will be concerning an embryo is no different from forcibly fertilizing her.
 
The OP is why women will register and vote in the masses this fall against the GOP.
/——/ Pointless because by the Fall, we’ll have 5 SC conservative judges on the bench. Nothing the democRATs can do to change that. Sorry Snuffles.
 
Jailed for ending a pregnancy: how prosecutors get inventive on abortion

Once Roe v Wade is ultimately struck down as Trump predicted -- since Trump promised to appoint judges who will overturn the 1973 SC decision; how much time should women and abortionists get for having an abortion?? If you knowingly drive a woman to get an abortion, should you also be charged?

Now I highly doubt we are going to insist that women get the death penalty for having an illegal abortion, but they have to be punished somehow -- Also, would killing an abortion doctor then be considered justified?

Life, its premeditated.
/——-/ Premeditated??? I think you mean predetermined.
 
The issue has never been about the woman’s body. That’s the lie you hide behind. It’s about the child’s constitutional rights to life.

An embryo is not a child. A sperm is not a child. An egg is not a child.
There are no "rights" offered to a growing mass of cells entirely dependent on the mother.
It would die immediately outside the womb.
And for the record, I am opposed to abortion after the first trimester unless the life of the mother is at risk.

Here, you'll enjoy this :cool:



An embryo with human dna is not life? Lol.


Life can grow in a petri dish. Bacteria, viruses, fungi are all living, they don't create infants though.


A life in a womb is not a petri dish. We do know your tactics in referring to a child as petri dish in order to vanquish your conscience so you will not have to think about the morbid atrocities of abortion.
 
There is a huge disparity when it comes the termination of a pregnancy.

If a man assaults a woman and she has a miscarriage. He will be arrested, charged with murder, and receive prison time if convicted.

But if that same woman has an abortion. She will be hailed as a hero by the liberals for terminating the baby. .... :cuckoo:
You do understand that isn't a disparity right?

Its only a disparity for people who are disingenuous --- so lets put your money where your mouth is -- Do you want women to get the death penalty for having an abortion? If not, then shut the fuck up with the disparity bullshit.

It's not?

I shoot a pregnant woman and kill her and the baby, do I not get charged with two homicides?

If she goes to Planned Parenthood and has an abortion, why should she not be charged with a homicide?
Again, there is a reason you dick suckers don't come out and demand women who have abortions be sentenced to death -- because you do understand there is NOT a disparity between someone murdering a woman and her child versus a woman making the decision herself to terminate the pregnancy...

If you are saying these are the same things -- why is there such a reluctance to call for the death penalty for all of those involved with the abortion?

In both cases a child dies. There is no difference.

I want to know why a child would be aborted when so many couples would love to adopt a baby.
Yours is the tired old fall back solution. Truth: Healthy white babies only. Plus, it is so expensive to adopt that many simply can't afford it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top