How Racist Are You? Discussion & Social Experiment

Don't have time to watch the videos, but I bet they don't have anything to do with racism.
Probably about discrimination and prejudice. Both are natural for self preservation and our right as personal privilege.
Will you still defend them when you are on the losing end? Ever find it strange when the KKK complains about reverse discrimination after holding the position that discrimination is part of the right to self-preservation of a race? If that's the case, then why would they say it's not right for whites to be subject to prejudice and discrimination?

At some point, wouldn't it be better for people to just be individuals treating other individuals fairly and without prejudice and discrimination?


My post was about individual preservation. I could care less about preserving any race.

I do treat individuals fairly, for the most part I ignore anyone I don't know.
I don't call anyone names, I don't harm anyone.

I go about my business and let others do the same. I don't acknowledge other's presence and prefer they don't acknowledge mine.

I think that's fair.

You personally have no power to enforce your racism. The videos are about white people benefitting from the system and either ignoring or pretending racism does not exist.
 
Jane Elliott is s sociopathic sadist who gets off on insulting people by proxy, why the fuck would any sane person watch a video about her technique?

Because if you dont watch it then it means you are afraid of learning anything. Not to mention probably insane.

No it doesn't.
Are you by chance bipolar? You swing from normal to stupid like it's your job.

Yes it does. I forgot to mention lazy as well.
 
Don't have time to watch the videos, but I bet they don't have anything to do with racism.
Probably about discrimination and prejudice. Both are natural for self preservation and our right as personal privilege.

I wouldnt be so eager to admit being ignorant. Racism is definitely what she is talking about. The word "ism" literally means system. Racism is a system built to benefit a particular race. You more than anyone need to watch the video.


I'm not part of any system. I prefer live and let live.

I don't mess with people and I don't want anyone messing with me.

If I walk into a store, restaurant, etc and don't like what I see, I don't make a scene, I turn around and walk out.

I consider it my privilege to discriminate.

You need to watch the videos so you would understand you dont have a clue as to what you are talking about.
 
Don't have time to watch the videos, but I bet they don't have anything to do with racism.
Probably about discrimination and prejudice. Both are natural for self preservation and our right as personal privilege.

I wouldnt be so eager to admit being ignorant. Racism is definitely what she is talking about. The word "ism" literally means system. Racism is a system built to benefit a particular race. You more than anyone need to watch the video.

So you freely admit that Affirmative Action is racist? Thanks.

The only racist affirmative action I am aware of is the one that whites had for 400 years. The current one benefits all races and primarily white women.
 
Funny, this woman also had blue eyes, and all the people segregated out were white. Funny thing about that, I come from a family of blue-hazel colored eyes. My eyes are dark brown. Never thought about it before. And, when it comes to racism, funny thing about that, too. I attended mostly black Jr. & Sr. schools. That taught me a lot about racism, alright. Black hate and scorn against whites is just as potent a thing as white racism. A rose by any other name...This woman's message doesn't seem to be getting across. Lessons on racism almost always ends up being a parable about reinforcing black/ minority victimhood than opening eyes. Regardless of their color.
 
I wouldnt be so eager to admit being ignorant. Racism is definitely what she is talking about. The word "ism" literally means system. Racism is a system built to benefit a particular race. You more than anyone need to watch the video.

So you freely admit that Affirmative Action is racist? Thanks.

The only racist affirmative action I am aware of is the one that whites had for 400 years. The current one benefits all races and primarily white women.

Keep telling yourself that. Concentrate on qualified white men who have lost jobs to unqualified blacks or whites disqualified for promotion solely because of their complexion. Thankfully, SCOTUS has fixed THAT little twist.
(Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009))
 
So you freely admit that Affirmative Action is racist? Thanks.

The only racist affirmative action I am aware of is the one that whites had for 400 years. The current one benefits all races and primarily white women.

Keep telling yourself that. Concentrate on qualified white men who have lost jobs to unqualified blacks or whites disqualified for promotion solely because of their complexion. Thankfully, SCOTUS has fixed THAT little twist.
(Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009))

I could care less what happened to white men. I said white men had AA for 400 years and white women benefit from AA more than any other demographic including Black people. That was what your comment was about. Now you have moved to trying to gain pity for white men?
 
Last edited:
The only racist affirmative action I am aware of is the one that whites had for 400 years. The current one benefits all races and primarily white women.

Keep telling yourself that. Concentrate on qualified white men who have lost jobs to unqualified blacks or whites disqualified for promotion solely because of their complexion. Thankfully, SCOTUS has fixed THAT little twist.
(Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009))

I could care less what happened to white men. I said white men had AA for 400 years and white women benefit from AA more than any other demographic including Black people. That was what your comment was about. Now you have moved to trying to gain pity for white men?

I know you could care less about what happens to white men. Ya see, that's the difference. I want ALL Americans to be treated alike. You want special consideration for a situation that ended 150 years ago. GET OVER IT. GET A JOB. FEED YOUR FAMILY OR DON'T BREED.
 
The only racist affirmative action I am aware of is the one that whites had for 400 years. The current one benefits all races and primarily white women.

Keep telling yourself that. Concentrate on qualified white men who have lost jobs to unqualified blacks or whites disqualified for promotion solely because of their complexion. Thankfully, SCOTUS has fixed THAT little twist.
(Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009))

I could care less what happened to white men. I said white men had AA for 400 years and white women benefit from AA more than any other demographic including Black people. That was what your comment was about. Now you have moved to trying to gain pity for white men?
Let's do the math.
1. I think we'll agree that white men (37% population) see no benefit from AA.
2. Black men and women (13% population) receive special treatment from AA.
3. White women (37% population) receive benefit from AA.

We'll leave out "other" (13% population) out of the equation for simplicity.
So I think even you can see that if half of white women and all blacks receive benefit fro AA, then it could be said that white women benefit more..

The fact remains that AA has benefited whites at half the rate of blacks.(irrespective of gender).
 
Keep telling yourself that. Concentrate on qualified white men who have lost jobs to unqualified blacks or whites disqualified for promotion solely because of their complexion. Thankfully, SCOTUS has fixed THAT little twist.
(Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009))

I could care less what happened to white men. I said white men had AA for 400 years and white women benefit from AA more than any other demographic including Black people. That was what your comment was about. Now you have moved to trying to gain pity for white men?
Let's do the math.
1. I think we'll agree that white men (37% population) see no benefit from AA.
2. Black men and women (13% population) receive special treatment from AA.
3. White women (37% population) receive benefit from AA.

We'll leave out "other" (13% population) out of the equation for simplicity.
So I think even you can see that if half of white women and all blacks receive benefit fro AA, then it could be said that white women benefit more..

The fact remains that AA has benefited whites at half the rate of blacks.(irrespective of gender).

You have several glaring fallacies in your argument. White women are mostly married to white men so that completely kills the argument that white men don't benefit from AA. Also all Black people dont benefit from AA the same as all Asians, Latinos, NA's etc dont benefit from it. At least try to disguise your fallacies a little better.
 
Keep telling yourself that.

I was talking to you. Didnt you notice I quoted your post?

I already know everything I need to know about her, I never listened to the Ted Bundy interviews either.

You may know but you asked the question why would any sane person watch the video. Everyone has not studied her in depth like you have. No one mentioned Ted Bundy even once because he does not teach classes on racism. Why did you bring him up? Were you attempting to execute your specialty and start the deflections?
 
Not all, I suppose, but sure as hell a lot more as a percentage of population, than whites. The fact that more white women benefit from AA than blacks is simply a function of US population by race.
 
My post was about individual preservation. I could care less about preserving any race.

I do treat individuals fairly, for the most part I ignore anyone I don't know.
I don't call anyone names, I don't harm anyone.

I go about my business and let others do the same. I don't acknowledge other's presence and prefer they don't acknowledge mine.

I think that's fair.
I agree with you that people have the right to behave anonymously and treated as such, regardless of how others view them. Of course, this can become a problem when anonymity becomes a facade for people looking to get away with malicious actions covertly but it's a catch-22 because the reason the facade works is because innocent people have the right to privacy and even guilty people have to be assumed innocent until proven guilty . . . unlike how Trayvon Martin was treated prior to the confrontation (but that's another discussion altogether).

Also, there's somewhat of a fine line between discriminating against a business because of legitimate preferences, such as the cultural atmosphere, and people simply discriminating because of the skin-color or other physical (i.e. non-cultural) aspects of employees and customers. People can claim they are discriminating on the basis of content and not color, but if what they say is a cover-up for simple race-bias, is it fair and/or legitimate? If you were unable to get a job because employers were afraid your skin-color would result in customers passing their business by, would you accept that and just keep applying to other jobs no matter how many times you got turned down because of prejudice?
 
Because if you dont watch it then it means you are afraid of learning anything. Not to mention probably insane.

N0 I just don't care. I am not racist.

Typically not caring about learning is a coping mechanism. Think of it like this. You don't care to learn anything that may change the way you think even a little. Thats either willful ignorance or fear. Like the lady said, If you are white and made it through school here in the US and you are not a racist then you are a miracle. IOW the school system did not do its job indoctrinating you on the subject of white supremacy.
 
Not all, I suppose, but sure as hell a lot more as a percentage of population, than whites. The fact that more white women benefit from AA than blacks is simply a function of US population by race.

Thanks for admitting that the present AA is only slightly less beneficial to whites than the centuries of white AA.
 
I was talking to you. Didnt you notice I quoted your post?

I already know everything I need to know about her, I never listened to the Ted Bundy interviews either.

You may know but you asked the question why would any sane person watch the video. Everyone has not studied her in depth like you have. No one mentioned Ted Bundy even once because he does not teach classes on racism. Why did you bring him up? Were you attempting to execute your specialty and start the deflections?

Why did I bring up Ted Bundy? Because, like you said, I know about Dr Jane Elliott and understand that, like Bundy, she is able to use her sociopathy to manipulate people into situations that they would normally avoid in order to cause pain and suffering for her own enjoyment.

Any other stupid questions?
 
I already know everything I need to know about her, I never listened to the Ted Bundy interviews either.

You may know but you asked the question why would any sane person watch the video. Everyone has not studied her in depth like you have. No one mentioned Ted Bundy even once because he does not teach classes on racism. Why did you bring him up? Were you attempting to execute your specialty and start the deflections?

Why did I bring up Ted Bundy? Because, like you said, I know about Dr Jane Elliott and understand that, like Bundy, she is able to use her sociopathy to manipulate people into situations that they would normally avoid in order to cause pain and suffering for her own enjoyment.

Any other stupid questions?

Dr Jane Elliott is a teacher. Ted Bundy was a killer. Any other retarded excuses to deflect from the OP?
 
Today I came across an interesting video, well, I had it on my browser for over a week, but just today actually looking at it, that featured a discussion on race that Oprah Winfrey conducted on one of her old show's taping. I was fascinated by how it went...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmOoevyiA4I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcYeFAMoQAk

What I find even more fascinating was the findings that her guest Dr. Jane Elliot discovered about racism over her decades-long career.

I guarantee, everyone and anyone who watches this video, especially, will learn something from it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MYHBrJIIFU

To those who have watched it, let's discuss the discoveries in the study.

Jane Elliott is s sociopathic sadist who gets off on insulting people by proxy, why the fuck would any sane person watch a video about her technique?

Yeah, I don't know. I stopped a few minutes into it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top