How the Christian Right's Homophobia Scares Away Religious Young People

[koshergrl]

Pssst. Give 'em Matthew 23.

Psst...Matthew 23 is your theme song, honey.

Feel like calling out any more child abuse victims for yucks and giggles?

It fits you to a T, and I'm only surprised you can't see it, since you claim to be SO very honest.

He's not a victim, by his own definition.

Or he's lying.

Like I said - if he were a gay man, you'd be there with bells on, waving Kinsey reports all about.

Hypocrite much?

You're a psycho.

 

[Sunni Man]

The criminal law is off limits in both state and federal constitutions: separation of church and state.

No overwhelmingly Christian or unreligious majority will permit such amendments.

Amendments are exactly that; Amendments.

They can be added, changed, revoked; depending on the Supreme Court's justices personal ideology and the nations collective social mind set.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The criminal law is off limits in both state and federal constitutions: separation of church and state.

No overwhelmingly Christian or unreligious majority will permit such amendments.

Amendments are exactly that; Amendments.

They can be added, changed, revoked; depending on the Supreme Court's justices personal ideology and the nations collective social mind set.

I suspect you don't understand the Amendment process. Go check your Constitution. The social mind set of the American narrative is that of all ideologies to which it is hostile, only fascism bothers it more than Islam.

 

[Meister]

The criminal law is off limits in both state and federal constitutions: separation of church and state.

No overwhelmingly Christian or unreligious majority will permit such amendments.

Amendments are exactly that; Amendments.

They can be added, changed, revoked; depending on the Supreme Court's justices personal ideology and the nations collective social mind set.

Thank God that the SC morphed the term of separation of church and state.
Goes to show that even a broken clock is right twice a day.

 

[High_Gravity]

If we already have a law to stipulate what is legal and wasn't legal, why would we need Sharia Law to double down our laws already in existance?

Muslims currently have Sharia civil law for dealing with family matters and contracts based on the Quran and Hadith.

Eventually, we hope to influence, add to, or replace some aspects of U.S. criminal law with Sharia law.

Nobodies stopping Muslims in the west from practicing their faith, I don't understand this lust to make the rest of us follow it as well.

 

[koshergrl]

Because it's not just a faith..it's an ideology and a political structure as well.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Keep talking, koshergirl, and explain.

 

[Sunni Man]

I suspect you don't understand the Amendment process. Go check your Constitution. The social mind set of the American narrative is that of all ideologies to which it is hostile, only fascism bothers it more than Islam.

Who the people setting on the SC matters; because they bring their ideologies and personal agenda with them.

Someday in the future we will have muslim(s) setting on the Supreme Court.

 

[Parsifal]

Parsifal keeps carping about Proverbs because he of course is concerned for his own salvation....

Nope.....You're the one who can't stop lying.

I can't help what the Bible says.....It says that God hates you for being a lying sack of shit.

 

[koshergrl]

No, it doesn't say that at all.

 

[BDBoop]

No, it doesn't say that at all.

Well, "Always correct" does seem to be a match for "A proud look."

And I'd go beyond that and include you up through 19.

Psalm 5 is a good call, too.

Dang! He nailed you.

 

[Parsifal]

it doesn't say that at all.

Now you're lying about what the Bible says......Good one!

 

[Buford]

If we already have a law to stipulate what is legal and wasn't legal, why would we need Sharia Law to double down our laws already in existance?

Muslims currently have Sharia civil law for dealing with family matters and contracts based on the Quran and Hadith.

Eventually, we hope to influence, add to, or replace some aspects of U.S. criminal law with Sharia law.

That's when you meet resistence. What are you going to do when you don't get your way?

 

[Sunni Man]

If we already have a law to stipulate what is legal and wasn't legal, why would we need Sharia Law to double down our laws already in existance?

Muslims currently have Sharia civil law for dealing with family matters and contracts based on the Quran and Hadith.

Eventually, we hope to influence, add to, or replace some aspects of U.S. criminal law with Sharia law.

That's when you meet resistence. What are you going to do when you don't get your way?

Muslims meet resistence every day; so it's nothing new.

We handle it different ways depending on the situation.

But we will never stop pushing and demanding.

True story

 

[JakeStarkey]

I suspect you don't understand the Amendment process. Go check your Constitution. The social mind set of the American narrative is that of all ideologies to which it is hostile, only fascism bothers it more than Islam.

Who the people setting on the SC matters; because they bring their ideologies and personal agenda with them. Someday in the future we will have muslim(s) setting on the Supreme Court.

Won't matter. You won't have the influence in Congress and the states to get your Amendments, and the SC is not going to rule for sharia criminal law. It can't.

 

[Parsifal]

Parsnip's elevator stops at about neck level.

You've asserted that Obama and many of his black supporters are in favor of black genocide.

That's about as stupid as it gets.....You've proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you're dumb as a post.

 

[Sunni Man]

Won't matter. You won't have the influence in Congress and the states to get your Amendments, and the SC is not going to rule for sharia criminal law. It can't.

Really depends on how large the Islamic demographic becomes.

And how many muslim politicians are in state and federal government positions.

And yes, the SC can rule in favor of Sharia Law if the Judges decide to go that way.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, the growth of the demographic will be important as the number of muslim politicians.

The Judge can rule any way he wishes, but eventually, if sharia is not compatible with the Constittuion, the ruling will fail.

 

[Sunni Man]

Yes, the growth of the demographic will be important as the number of muslim politicians.

The Judge can rule any way he wishes, but eventually, if sharia is not compatible with the Constittuion, the ruling will fail.

Sharia and the Constitution are very much alike in both content and substance.

So it will be very easy to meld them together for the betterment of America and it's citizens.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No they are not.

It will be impossible to meld them or harmonize them.

Such an action would lead Americans into savagery: won't happen.