Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the Government doesn't protect our rights, why do we have a huge military/defense department, composed of thousands of government employees,
with the primary purpose of protecting us?
If the Government doesn't protect our rights, why do we have a huge military/defense department, composed of thousands of government employees,
with the primary purpose of protecting us?
Do you understand the difference between protecting us from invasion and protecting individual liberty? How about the difference between security and liberty? Why the fuck do people keep talking about safety like it means freedom?
Newsflash, moron, when I asked you why you keep asking me that question I was pointing out that you were making an assumption, If you had a brain that you actually used you would heave got the message.
You are so scared of simply stating your position it's fucking hilarious.
Tell me what wrong assumption I made. Be specific.
I remember arguing with you about why the Supreme Court was wrong about Obamacare.
I remember arguing with you about why they were right about Citizen's united.
I even remember explaining what, exactly, judicial activism is the the cretins who think that judicial review is legislating from the bench.
Yet, for some obscure reason, you keep asking me how an unconstitutional law could be struck down if the courts don't have the power to review them.
Guess what, it still doesn't make any sense.
I know for a fact I never argued that the Supreme Court cannot say a law is unconstitutional.
Just admit you were wrong.
You are so scared of simply stating your position it's fucking hilarious.
Tell me what wrong assumption I made. Be specific.
I remember arguing with you about why the Supreme Court was wrong about Obamacare.
I remember arguing with you about why they were right about Citizen's united.
I even remember explaining what, exactly, judicial activism is the the cretins who think that judicial review is legislating from the bench.
Yet, for some obscure reason, you keep asking me how an unconstitutional law could be struck down if the courts don't have the power to review them.
Guess what, it still doesn't make any sense.
I know for a fact I never argued that the Supreme Court cannot say a law is unconstitutional.
Just admit you were wrong.
lol,
then you cannot say that the government does not protect our rights, because that is exactly what the Supreme Court does, and the Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch of the Government,
which makes it Government.
If the Government doesn't protect our rights, why do we have a huge military/defense department, composed of thousands of government employees,
with the primary purpose of protecting us?
Do you understand the difference between protecting us from invasion and protecting individual liberty? How about the difference between security and liberty? Why the fuck do people keep talking about safety like it means freedom?
Did the Continental Army fight for, and secure, our freedom, or not?
You are so scared of simply stating your position it's fucking hilarious.
Tell me what wrong assumption I made. Be specific.
I remember arguing with you about why the Supreme Court was wrong about Obamacare.
I remember arguing with you about why they were right about Citizen's united.
I even remember explaining what, exactly, judicial activism is the the cretins who think that judicial review is legislating from the bench.
Yet, for some obscure reason, you keep asking me how an unconstitutional law could be struck down if the courts don't have the power to review them.
Guess what, it still doesn't make any sense.
I know for a fact I never argued that the Supreme Court cannot say a law is unconstitutional.
Just admit you were wrong.
lol,
then you cannot say that the government does not protect our rights, because that is exactly what the Supreme Court does, and the Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch of the Government,
which makes it Government.
I remember arguing with you about why the Supreme Court was wrong about Obamacare.
I remember arguing with you about why they were right about Citizen's united.
I even remember explaining what, exactly, judicial activism is the the cretins who think that judicial review is legislating from the bench.
Yet, for some obscure reason, you keep asking me how an unconstitutional law could be struck down if the courts don't have the power to review them.
Guess what, it still doesn't make any sense.
I know for a fact I never argued that the Supreme Court cannot say a law is unconstitutional.
Just admit you were wrong.
lol,
then you cannot say that the government does not protect our rights, because that is exactly what the Supreme Court does, and the Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch of the Government,
which makes it Government.
If the government protected our rights the Supreme Court would never have to overturn a law. As for them protecting our rights, if they did tyhat they would never argue that the Constitution justifies searches without a warrant. The PATRIOT Act does not protect our rights. The TSA does not protect our rights. The government does not protect our rights.
I know how it is supposed to work, I also know how works in reality. Reality sucks.
lol,
then you cannot say that the government does not protect our rights, because that is exactly what the Supreme Court does, and the Supreme Court is part of the judicial branch of the Government,
which makes it Government.
If the government protected our rights the Supreme Court would never have to overturn a law. As for them protecting our rights, if they did tyhat they would never argue that the Constitution justifies searches without a warrant. The PATRIOT Act does not protect our rights. The TSA does not protect our rights. The government does not protect our rights.
I know how it is supposed to work, I also know how works in reality. Reality sucks.
That's like saying that a helmet doesn't protect a motorcyclist because sometimes he gets killed even when he's wearing one.
The Obama administration is drawing up plans to give all U.S. spy agencies full access to a massive database that contains financial data on American citizens and others who bank in the country, according to a Treasury Department document seen by Reuters.
EXCLUSIVE - U.S. to let spy agencies scour Americans' finances | Reuters
Al Qaida operatives, Iranian spies, Russian spies, Hezbollah cells, etc, etc, etc.......are all funded through domestic banking accounts.
And what does that have to do with the government getting access to my personal financial information without a warrant? Weren't people like you howling about the Bush Administration listening to phone calls without warrants?
Unless you're a hypocrite, you should be even more upset about this intrusion into your privacy.
