How to feel like a nine-year-old (Watch this video)

TheGreatGatsby

Gold Member
Mar 27, 2012
24,433
3,103
280
California
Honestly, it feels like these two are speaking to a contingency of nine-year-olds. Wow! Are liberals this much in arrested development now?

 
That was a Hillary double, Hillary was sound asleep, it was after all after 8PM.
 
I can see why "the blue wall" was really the red wall. Hard working Americans don't want to be spoken to like they're children.
 
Honestly, it feels like these two are speaking to a contingency of nine-year-olds. Wow! Are liberals this much in arrested development now?


Apparently enough liberals realized that Hillary is a lying corporatist warmongering elitist asshole...because she lost.
 
LOL Diversity sure bothers the right wing ideologues, every thing human confuses them in their hatred of women and people who don't share in their hate. Weak people voted for a man who lied to them and still in their insecurity they cling to him. The emasculated right wing is kinda sad, but saviors, even buffoonish ones like Trump, appeal to the weak who require confirmation their lives will be made better by words alone. See book quoted below for the person who can so easily be managed by empty promises.

The "least resistant personality profile' - the Trump follower.

"So how can such a company get a community to accept it? The plant manager's best course of action, Powell concluded, would not be to try to change the minds of residents predisposed to resist. It would be to find a citizenry unlikely to resist.

Based on interviews and questionnaires, Powell drew up a list of characteristics of the "least resistant personality profile":

• Longtime residents of small towns in the South or Midwest
• High school educated only
• Catholic
• Uninvolved in social issues, and without a culture of activism
• Involved in mining, farming, ranching (what Cerrell called "nature exploitative occupations")
• Conservative
• Republican
• Advocates of the free market

When the big oil companies first came to Louisiana in the 1940s, 40 percent of adults in Louisiana had no more than a fifth-grade education, and its citizens were the least likely in the nation to move out of state. From the seventies on, most people had become Republican advocates of the free market and minimal government. Most of the people I met fit some or all of the criteria-they were long-time residents, high school educated (half were), conservative, and Republican. That description fit the Arenos and largely fit Lee Sherman. Those who resisted the oil industry fit a very different profile-young, college educated, urban, liberal, strongly interested in social issues, and believers in good government. Was the "least resistant personality" one susceptible to what General Honore had called the "psychological program"-the talk of "jobs, jobs, jobs" that had "just enough to it?" Or was that too easy an idea, an idea from my side of the empathy wall? "

Excerpt page 80. Strangers in Their Own Land

And an old post: CDZ - The Emasculated American

"The fanatic is not really a stickler to principle. He embraces a cause not primarily because of its justness or holiness but because of his desperate need for something to hold onto." Eric Hoffer
 
LOL Diversity sure bothers the right wing ideologues, every thing human confuses them in their hatred of women and people who don't share in their hate. Weak people voted for a man who lied to them and still in their insecurity they cling to him. The emasculated right wing is kinda sad, but saviors, even buffoonish ones like Trump, appeal to the weak who require confirmation their lives will be made better by words alone. See book quoted below for the person who can so easily be managed by empty promises.

The "least resistant personality profile' - the Trump follower.

"So how can such a company get a community to accept it? The plant manager's best course of action, Powell concluded, would not be to try to change the minds of residents predisposed to resist. It would be to find a citizenry unlikely to resist.

Based on interviews and questionnaires, Powell drew up a list of characteristics of the "least resistant personality profile":

• Longtime residents of small towns in the South or Midwest
• High school educated only
• Catholic
• Uninvolved in social issues, and without a culture of activism
• Involved in mining, farming, ranching (what Cerrell called "nature exploitative occupations")
• Conservative
• Republican
• Advocates of the free market

When the big oil companies first came to Louisiana in the 1940s, 40 percent of adults in Louisiana had no more than a fifth-grade education, and its citizens were the least likely in the nation to move out of state. From the seventies on, most people had become Republican advocates of the free market and minimal government. Most of the people I met fit some or all of the criteria-they were long-time residents, high school educated (half were), conservative, and Republican. That description fit the Arenos and largely fit Lee Sherman. Those who resisted the oil industry fit a very different profile-young, college educated, urban, liberal, strongly interested in social issues, and believers in good government. Was the "least resistant personality" one susceptible to what General Honore had called the "psychological program"-the talk of "jobs, jobs, jobs" that had "just enough to it?" Or was that too easy an idea, an idea from my side of the empathy wall? "

Excerpt page 80. Strangers in Their Own Land

And an old post: CDZ - The Emasculated American

"The fanatic is not really a stickler to principle. He embraces a cause not primarily because of its justness or holiness but because of his desperate need for something to hold onto." Eric Hoffer
Diversity sure bothers the right wing ideologues,
Diversity - to be diverse, to divide. A country is conquered when their citizens are divided.
Community - to be united, to come together. A country united will stay free.

Just cant get more stupid than a liberal.
 
Am disappointed this morning. After watching OP video for a minute I skipped to end hoping to see Hillary look through her magic hoop and proclaim, "I see My2¢, I see Ray from Cleveland and TomHorn and..."
 
LOL Diversity sure bothers the right wing ideologues, every thing human confuses them in their hatred of women and people who don't share in their hate. Weak people voted for a man who lied to them and still in their insecurity they cling to him. The emasculated right wing is kinda sad, but saviors, even buffoonish ones like Trump, appeal to the weak who require confirmation their lives will be made better by words alone. See book quoted below for the person who can so easily be managed by empty promises.

The "least resistant personality profile' - the Trump follower.

"So how can such a company get a community to accept it? The plant manager's best course of action, Powell concluded, would not be to try to change the minds of residents predisposed to resist. It would be to find a citizenry unlikely to resist.

Based on interviews and questionnaires, Powell drew up a list of characteristics of the "least resistant personality profile":

• Longtime residents of small towns in the South or Midwest
• High school educated only
• Catholic
• Uninvolved in social issues, and without a culture of activism
• Involved in mining, farming, ranching (what Cerrell called "nature exploitative occupations")
• Conservative
• Republican
• Advocates of the free market

When the big oil companies first came to Louisiana in the 1940s, 40 percent of adults in Louisiana had no more than a fifth-grade education, and its citizens were the least likely in the nation to move out of state. From the seventies on, most people had become Republican advocates of the free market and minimal government. Most of the people I met fit some or all of the criteria-they were long-time residents, high school educated (half were), conservative, and Republican. That description fit the Arenos and largely fit Lee Sherman. Those who resisted the oil industry fit a very different profile-young, college educated, urban, liberal, strongly interested in social issues, and believers in good government. Was the "least resistant personality" one susceptible to what General Honore had called the "psychological program"-the talk of "jobs, jobs, jobs" that had "just enough to it?" Or was that too easy an idea, an idea from my side of the empathy wall? "

Excerpt page 80. Strangers in Their Own Land

And an old post: CDZ - The Emasculated American

"The fanatic is not really a stickler to principle. He embraces a cause not primarily because of its justness or holiness but because of his desperate need for something to hold onto." Eric Hoffer

:cuckoo:
 
Honestly, it feels like these two are speaking to a contingency of nine-year-olds. Wow! Are liberals this much in arrested development now?


Man, I miss fat old chipmunk cheeks with those awful baggy eyes and screechy voice. The Junkyard Dog is sooo lucky she's around all the time now. Some despicable assholes have all the luck.
 
LOL Diversity sure bothers the right wing ideologues, every thing human confuses them in their hatred of women and people who don't share in their hate. Weak people voted for a man who lied to them and still in their insecurity they cling to him. The emasculated right wing is kinda sad, but saviors, even buffoonish ones like Trump, appeal to the weak who require confirmation their lives will be made better by words alone. See book quoted below for the person who can so easily be managed by empty promises.

The "least resistant personality profile' - the Trump follower.

"So how can such a company get a community to accept it? The plant manager's best course of action, Powell concluded, would not be to try to change the minds of residents predisposed to resist. It would be to find a citizenry unlikely to resist.

Based on interviews and questionnaires, Powell drew up a list of characteristics of the "least resistant personality profile":

• Longtime residents of small towns in the South or Midwest
• High school educated only
• Catholic
• Uninvolved in social issues, and without a culture of activism
• Involved in mining, farming, ranching (what Cerrell called "nature exploitative occupations")
• Conservative
• Republican
• Advocates of the free market

When the big oil companies first came to Louisiana in the 1940s, 40 percent of adults in Louisiana had no more than a fifth-grade education, and its citizens were the least likely in the nation to move out of state. From the seventies on, most people had become Republican advocates of the free market and minimal government. Most of the people I met fit some or all of the criteria-they were long-time residents, high school educated (half were), conservative, and Republican. That description fit the Arenos and largely fit Lee Sherman. Those who resisted the oil industry fit a very different profile-young, college educated, urban, liberal, strongly interested in social issues, and believers in good government. Was the "least resistant personality" one susceptible to what General Honore had called the "psychological program"-the talk of "jobs, jobs, jobs" that had "just enough to it?" Or was that too easy an idea, an idea from my side of the empathy wall? "

Excerpt page 80. Strangers in Their Own Land

And an old post: CDZ - The Emasculated American

"The fanatic is not really a stickler to principle. He embraces a cause not primarily because of its justness or holiness but because of his desperate need for something to hold onto." Eric Hoffer

This is pretty much the nuttery bubble that HC was living in. HIllary actually spoke like this instead of being real with Americans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top