Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
Go for itWhat's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
The phrase "black lives matter" is not a political endorsement. Seeking free advertising on public property for a political candidate is. I guess painting the streets with "Biden 2020" would be acceptable.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
The phrase "black lives matter" is not a political endorsement. Seeking free advertising on public property for a political candidate is. I guess painting the streets with "Biden 2020" would be acceptable.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
The phrase "black lives matter" is not a political endorsement. Seeking free advertising on public property for a political candidate is. I guess painting the streets with "Biden 2020" would be acceptable.
It doesn't matter what the message is, brainlet. If person/group A gets to paint on the taxpayer's streets, then so does person/group B. It's called the 14th Amendment - equal protection under the law.
Do not lie.This is an extremely misleading headline. There is nothing in the phrase "black lives matter" that has any connection to economics. It is an innocuous phrase that no one should have any trouble with. The "marxist" bit was created by a bunch of right-wing monkeys who somehow were taught how to type.
Go for itWhat's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
The phrase "black lives matter" is not a political endorsement. Seeking free advertising on public property for a political candidate is. I guess painting the streets with "Biden 2020" would be acceptable.
Do it on every mlk boulevard in the nation
Make the "L" into a "D"I put a F next to BLM
Bullshit!!!This is an extremely misleading headline. There is nothing in the phrase "black lives matter" that has any connection to economics. It is an innocuous phrase that no one should have any trouble with. The "marxist" bit was created by a bunch of right-wing monkeys who somehow were taught how to type.
Bullshit!!!This is an extremely misleading headline. There is nothing in the phrase "black lives matter" that has any connection to economics. It is an innocuous phrase that no one should have any trouble with. The "marxist" bit was created by a bunch of right-wing monkeys who somehow were taught how to type.
Bullshit!!!This is an extremely misleading headline. There is nothing in the phrase "black lives matter" that has any connection to economics. It is an innocuous phrase that no one should have any trouble with. The "marxist" bit was created by a bunch of right-wing monkeys who somehow were taught how to type.
Black Lives Matter has absolutely nothing to do with marxism. This whole thing was created by some worthless right-wing bimbo.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If cities grant permission for an activist slogan to be painted on a street it's fair game for ANYONE ELSE to do the same.
The phrase "black lives matter" is not a political endorsement. Seeking free advertising on public property for a political candidate is. I guess painting the streets with "Biden 2020" would be acceptable.
It doesn't matter what the message is, brainlet. If person/group A gets to paint on the taxpayer's streets, then so does person/group B. It's called the 14th Amendment - equal protection under the law.
Not necessarily. BTW: I didn't think that you right-wing nutjobs even liked the 14th Amendment. You people seem to be all fussy-wussy and cry big crocodile tears when LGBTs are found to have the right to marry or pro-choice groups sue to get states that have already issued so-called "pro-life" vanity license plates to issue pro-choice plates, and you sure do hate it when the Satanic Temple puts up their statues. I don't think that endorsements of political candidates should be allowed, no matter who these candidates are.
Bullshit!!!This is an extremely misleading headline. There is nothing in the phrase "black lives matter" that has any connection to economics. It is an innocuous phrase that no one should have any trouble with. The "marxist" bit was created by a bunch of right-wing monkeys who somehow were taught how to type.
Black Lives Matter has absolutely nothing to do with marxism. This whole thing was created by some worthless right-wing bimbo.