bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,329
- 2,180
He hated Marxism, not socialism. You keep trying to ignore that fact no matter how many times someone informs you of it.
I do ignore it, because it is has no basis in reality.
Marxism (and/or Marxism-Leninism) is not only the predominant form of socialism, but Marx was the author of what we understand Socialism to be. There would likely be no Socialism witout Marx (and Engels) and the difference between the two terms is paper thin, if there is a difference at all. Many sources use the terms interchangeably when discussing movements such as the FSLN, Russian Bolsheviks or other peasant rebellions.
You might as well claim that someone hated Maoism, but loved Chinese Communism.
That's utter horseshit. That may be what Marxists like you understand it to be, but economists have a different view. It's true that socialism would be dead as an ideology without Marx, but that's not the same as saying the socialism is the same thing as Marxism. The later is only a theory used to justify socialism. Socialism existed long before Marx appeared on the scene. Indeed, the French tried to implement it for a short while during the revolution.
Just another one of your premises that is dead wrong. That seems to be the case with most of your premises.