Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It could be that I will claim it's taken out of context. Rest assured I promise to give you sources to check for yourself that context if I do.We'll see who finds it impossible to judge the 41,000 hrs.
You'll be telling how not to believe it, it's been doctored and taken out of context.
That would be great. Sadly it will all be filtered by someone paid to lie to his audience.
Can't filter video, remember? You watched it live...........
It could be that I will claim it's taken out of context. Rest assured I promise to give you sources to check for yourself that context if I do.
That's how making claims works.
At this point he has every right to be. The tables are turning now and it's making a lot of people nervous. They have been hiding this stuff in effort to hurt Trump. Now that it's all going to come out, it's going to end up hurting them twice as much. I can't wait for them to put Nancy on the stand about the Capitol security situation, plus the dozen or so whistleblowers in the FBI. It's all going to come out this year.
Of course you can filter/edit video.
Are you really this stupid?
Have you never watched a football game and then later seen filtered videos of just the part ESPN wanted to show?
Nice hit piece. Notice that what they claimed were "racist" remarks were not racist by any definition of the word?
What Fox really argued is that he was not speaking on behalf of the network, he was speaking on behalf of himself; an individual opinion which outlets like CNN and MSNBC do all the time.
.We'll see who finds it impossible to judge the 41,000 hrs.
You'll be telling how not to believe it, it's been doctored and taken out of context.
Thanks for making my point.
You have no point. You are just trying to cover for the fact we will not be able to trust a thing that comes from Tucker
Sure, if it's a video for instance I can probably give you the entire video that gives the full context. Or if it's a video making a claim about something. I can for instance find something else. A charging document, another video disputing the narrative. I could dispute it. I've given a few possible scenarios.It's a video remember? What you guys have been pushing for 2 years.
Sources??? LMAO
Sure, if it's a video for instance I can probably give you the entire video that gives the full context. Or if it's a video making a claim about something. I can for instance find something else. A charging document, another video disputing the narrative. I could dispute it. I've given a few possible scenarios.
The point is this. I don't claim that something is taking out of context without me being able to show something to back up my claim. And I'm not talking about showing what Don Lemon has to say but something that is solid. I do not, not ever, simply attack a source, no matter how well deserved. Without being able to back it up.
Yes, we will. My question to you is. If you do see, are you willing to accept what you are seeing?We shall see.
No need to cover, he has 41,000 hrs. of video.
Yes, we will. My question to you is. If you do see, are you willing to accept what you are seeing?
And they didn't win.How do you overthrow the US Gov't. with so few people and no weapons?
Your side tells us continuously, the people can't win against the gov't.
and how much of that 41,000 hours will he show?
Even if we get 10 hours of it, that is only 0.02% of the total.
What can possibly be gleaned from that?
Why not put all 41,000 on the web and letting everyone look at it as they choose?
Good question, why haven't the democrats done this?
It's been 2 years.
