Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.Nope, the jury reached the proper decision. They were instructed to acquit if there was any doubt — and OJ’s defense team did a masterful job of injecting doubt.
If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.Nope, the jury reached the proper decision. They were instructed to acquit if there was any doubt — and OJ’s defense team did a masterful job of injecting doubt.
If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Nope. The racist cop who claimed to find the murderers glove on OJ’s property couldn’t deny planting it out of fear of committing perjury.Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.Nope, the jury reached the proper decision. They were instructed to acquit if there was any doubt — and OJ’s defense team did a masterful job of injecting doubt.
If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Wrong
That was jury misconduct trying to settle scores
That's exactly how the jury system will now be destroyed
The democrats gets unequal Justice and conservatives will work the jury system to correct errors
Total chaos coming with the wise fleeing
South Africa and zimbabwee. Much worse than shown
So many crimes not known or listed
Where as brittain all crimes are listed
So a fraud way to compare
Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Fair enough, I had forgotten that detail. But there was more...Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
As you know, the jury was not present when that question was asked. In addition, the question was far more complex.
"In September 1995, after two sentences from the tapes were ruled admissible in court, Fuhrman took the stand for a second time. As reported by The Los Angeles Times, the jury was not present when he was asked three questions by defense attorney Gerald F. Uelmen. Uelmen asked Fuhrman if his testimony at the preliminary hearing had been truthful, whether or not he had ever falsified a police report, and if he had planted evidence in the Simpson case."
Did Fuhrman Plant Evidence In The Simpson Case?
Better luck next time.
Nope. The racist cop who claimed to find the murderers glove on OJ’s property couldn’t deny planting it out of fear of committing perjury.Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.Nope, the jury reached the proper decision. They were instructed to acquit if there was any doubt — and OJ’s defense team did a masterful job of injecting doubt.
If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Wrong
That was jury misconduct trying to settle scores
That's exactly how the jury system will now be destroyed
The democrats gets unequal Justice and conservatives will work the jury system to correct errors
Total chaos coming with the wise fleeing
Case done.
And then the dumbass prosecutor, asked OJ, an actor, to try on the glove after it shrank and hardened from the victims’ blood. For which OJ got an Oscar.
Plenty of doubt.
Dumbfuck, evidence is worthless in such a case when there’s doubt.Nope. The racist cop who claimed to find the murderers glove on OJ’s property couldn’t deny planting it out of fear of committing perjury.Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Wrong
That was jury misconduct trying to settle scores
That's exactly how the jury system will now be destroyed
The democrats gets unequal Justice and conservatives will work the jury system to correct errors
Total chaos coming with the wise fleeing
Case done.
And then the dumbass prosecutor, asked OJ, an actor, to try on the glove after it shrank and hardened from the victims’ blood. For which OJ got an Oscar.
Plenty of doubt.
Wrong
Plenty enough evidence
The jury was trying to settle scores
Now this will explode with the democrats proven as crooks without justice
Nope, the jury had reasonable doubt.Nope, the jury reached the proper decision. They were instructed to acquit if there was any doubt — and OJ’s defense team did a masterful job of injecting doubt.
If they were instructed to acquit for "ANY DOUBT" then the judge was grossly wrong. A reasonable doubt is NOT the same as "any doubt".
Yes, OJ had a multi-million dollar defense team. They also hired a multi-million dollar trial consulting firm. Something unavailable to the prosecution.
The now-canceled TV show Bull was loosely based on Dr. Phill McGraw. He started an incredibly successful trial consulting firm.
The OJ jury was trying to settle scores
Much worse will come now with totally unrqual justice
Key evidence was the glove found on OJ’s property.
When the cop who found the glove was asked:
Q: “Detective Fuhrman did you plant or manufacture evidence in this case?”
His answer, astonishingly, was:
A: “I assert my fifth amendment privilege.”
That was the moment the state lost their case.
Wrong
There was not a reasonable doubt
The OJ trial was the begginning of bad jury verdicts because of lowest on record IQ voters and on juries
And now even lower IQs
No nation can survive with record low IQs on juries and voting
As you know, the jury was not present when that question was asked. In addition, the question was far more complex.
It Was The Judge Tossing The Mountain Of EvidenceMacTheKnife said:the OJ jury was the beginning of record low IQs on juries and voting
You must be an idiot if you think the glove episode was more impactful than the fact that the Furhman was a racist that planted evidence. I dont know one Black person that hasnt witnessed cops planting evidence on Black people in the past.In my opinion, it was the glove that swayed the jury. In that, the prosecution was caught flat-footed!
How no one on the Prosecution realized what a bogus demonstration that was, has stunned me since the day it happened.
For many years I raced motorcycles. I raced Enduros which are 75 to 120-mile races, cross country, on a trail you don't know following arrows stapled to trees, through water, steep hill climbs, over logs, whatever. You wear leather gloves, they get wet from water and sweat. When you put them on for the next time you were riding, they had shrunk. WOW. Before you put them on, you had to work them like a baseball glove to loosen them up before putting them on and you had to work them to get them on your hand.
Blood on the gloves would even be worse, plus, putting on a pair of latex gloves before attempting to put on the murder gloves guaranteed that it was impossible for them to be put on.
Whites waged 2 of the most devastating and deadly world wars in human history -- for what?you just proved my point hahahhahahahahit's UNDENIABLE that blacks vote [ riot/burn/protests ] based on skin color, not policies or evidence/facts..also they graduate at lower ratesSo the white jurors are OK?some juries are stupid--like the OJ jury
Black jurors are not noted for their intelligence and in some cases of a technical nature that is a huge problem.
The predominantly black jury in the o.j. case had another problem....overly sympathetic to a fellow black being charged. They all wore black to protest.
MAJORITY-BLACK JURY SELECTED IN O.J. SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL
the whites are more fair/graduate at higher rates
per all the cop shootings and:
You stupid fuck, Blacks typically vote around 80% to 90% for Democrats.
They voted over 90% for HHH. You think he was black?
Your racism is quite obvious.
.....the whites ARE more fair and try to logically think out things --instead of IMPULSIVELY getting violent BEFORE thinking/getting the facts:
the white votes are more evenly spread out
In my opinion, it was the glove that swayed the jury. In that, the prosecution was caught flat-footed!
How no one on the Prosecution realized what a bogus demonstration that was, has stunned me since the day it happened.
For many years I raced motorcycles. I raced Enduros which are 75 to 120-mile races, cross country, on a trail you don't know following arrows stapled to trees, through water, steep hill climbs, over logs, whatever. You wear leather gloves, they get wet from water and sweat. When you put them on for the next time you were riding, they had shrunk. WOW. Before you put them on, you had to work them like a baseball glove to loosen them up before putting them on and you had to work them to get them on your hand.
Blood on the gloves would even be worse, plus, putting on a pair of latex gloves before attempting to put on the murder gloves guaranteed that it was impossible for them to be put on.
