Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So? Hunter sold sizzle, but no stake.
No crime without the stake.
If you are metaphor challenged, let me know, and I'll my grand nephew over to explain it to you.
Devon Archer, long time Hunter Biden associate, testified. He described that Hunter sold the 'illusion of access', but, in fact, no access was ever given. That's it, and, as Rep Dan Goldman states, (see video, below) there is no proof that Joe Biden was involved with Hunter Biden's deals.
None.
Did Hunter Biden leverage the Biden name for personal gain? Yes, but that isn't uncommon for siblings of famous people, and Hunter admitted it and is not illegal.
Did Hunter commit a FARA violation? Perhaps, but that doesn't prove any wrongdoing on Joe Biden.
Did Hunter Biden lie on a gun background check application? Yes, but that doesn't prove any wrongdoing on Joe Biden.
In fact, there is no proof of Joe Biden corruption, nor even for Hunter, for that matter. A few process violations, and that is it. Have fun prosecuting the son of a US President, who, on a rebound from the death of his brother,. made some bad choices. I doubt that a jury would convict. You see,. folks, this is why US Attorney David Weiss, after five years of investigating Hunter Biden, hasn't brought charges, he doesn't think he can win in court. That doesn't have anything to do with 'sweetheart' treatment, it's called 'prosecutorial discretion.
And, for that matter, name one private citizen who never held office who was assigned a special prosecutor for a 5 year investigation whose name wasn't Hunter Biden?
That doesn't sound like the 'sweetheart' treatment, to me.
Hunter Biden associate describes "illusion of access"
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/31/devon-archer-testify-hunter-biden
A former Hunter Biden associate told Congress that Hunter sold "the illusion of access" by putting his father on speaker phone with business partners, but that then-Vice President Biden never talked shop, according to Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) and a source familiar with the testimony.
Why it matters: Top Republicans called for an impeachment inquiry into President Biden ahead of Devon Archer's closed-door testimony Monday — and suggested that he boosted their case — while Democrats said there was no smoking gun tying Biden to his son's business entanglements.
Zoom in: Archer, who was convicted of fraud in 2018, testified that Hunter put his father on the phone with friends and business associates roughly 20 times over 10 years.
The intrigue: Archer testified that he knew nothing about the alleged $5 million bribes paid to the Biden family from a Burisma executive, as was claimed in an unverified FBI document touted and released by Republicans, according to one source familiar.
- But Archer "repeated over and over and over again that President Biden never discussed any business dealings or interests with Hunter or anyone else," Goldman told reporters after the hours-long transcribed interview.
- Republicans cast doubt on the claim that Biden simply exchanged "niceties" during the phone calls. They also focused on Archer's testimony that embattled Ukrainian gas company Burisma wanted Hunter on its board for his family's "brand."
Rep Dan Goldman: "This is a fishing expedition". Now, if you are going to doubt his claim, understand that he is a former prosecutor, knows something about 'evidence' and knows that Archer's testimony, taken under oath, was transcribed and now in the Congressional Record, so he's not going to lie about what Archer said. Anyway, the transcripts will be available soon.
Actually it's you that is fact challenged. The crackhead sold access to quid pro joe, as proven by Archer's testimony that without joes getting Shokin fired, Burisma would have probably gone bankrupt. And for that, the biden crime family got 10 million and the crackhead and Archer got positions on the Burisma board with salaries of 80+K a month. Here's a clue for ya commie, without the stake there is no sizzle.
.
The garbage you fools get pumped full is amazing.
Archer testified that "access to Joe Biden" was limited to small talk, never about any business.
I can what would you say is even remotely illegal about that?
As for the rest of your fantasies:
Nobody ever testified any first hand knowledge about any pay-off for Shokin removal or any other corrupt official act by Joe Biden.
Senate looked and found nothing in Biden family finances to support this supposed big-time 10 million pay off.
Of course the senate didn't have the multitude of SARS reports, the information from the reliable FBI informant, or the fact that the crackhead evaded taxes on millions. I'm sure he didn't want to pay taxes on money that went to xiden.
.
"Reliable informant" is not the source of the claim. At best he is "reliably" relaying what Burisma exec told him in a convo, with zero supporting evidence that it is in fact so.
That's it, that's the hearsay you rw nutters are building your wishful fantasies on.
That's exactly why further investigation is required. The informant claimed the Burisma exec has tapes of conversations with the crackhead and xiden, do you think he'll survive long enough for us to get those tapes?
I think you have right about nothing. Comeback when you have something besides wishful fantasies.
Squeals the fucking moron who bleated about Russia Russia Russia for 6 years.
Go fuck yourself you ridiculous toad.
I think you have right about nothing on Joe except hopes and wishes.
Good luck with your further investigations.
I think all xiden has is the deep state and LSM to try to cover his boney ass for another 15 months or whenever he kicks the bucket, which ever comes first.
.
Because you need conspiracy theories to cover the obvious gaps between your wishful fantasies and reality.
Poor little commie, every theory of a crime could be tagged a conspiracy theory, until enough evidence is gathered to prove it otherwise. And the evidence against the xiden crime family is mounting. But your anxiety is truly a joy to watch.
.
Actually it's you that is fact challenged. The crackhead sold access to quid pro joe, as proven by Archer's testimony that without joes getting Shokin fired, Burisma would have probably gone bankrupt. And for that, the biden crime family got 10 million and the crackhead and Archer got positions on the Burisma board with salaries of 80+K a month. Here's a clue for ya commie, without the stake there is no sizzle.
.
Actually, those were Goldman's words, not Archer's.Devon Archer, long time Hunter Biden associate, testified. He described that Hunter sold the 'illusion of access'
It is, however, accurate as a descriptor. Archer's testimony exonerated Joe.Actually, those were Goldman's words, not Archer's.
You might want to ask the folks at Axios why they would lie to you about that.
Explain how any company, if they were led to believe they were getting something for their investment, and then that something never materializes, and the company keeps paying. They wouldn’t. After a short time, they’d be demanding that hunter hold up to his end of the bargain and if he didn’t, they’d remove him from their payroll.
The truth is, the access was there. 20 times Biden was brought in on business related phone calls…for what..to say “hi, how’s the weather”? Do the reverse test. If it was trump, would you believe it? No, you wouldn’t.
We all knew archer wasn’t going to confess anything. I even posted that before the trial took place.
Actually it's you that is fact challenged. The crackhead sold access to quid pro joe, as proven by Archer's testimony that without joes getting Shokin fired, Burisma would have probably gone bankrupt. And for that, the biden crime family got 10 million and the crackhead and Archer got positions on the Burisma board with salaries of 80+K a month. Here's a clue for ya commie, without the stake there is no sizzle.
.
