Rumpole
Diamond Member
- Mar 20, 2023
- 2,946
- 2,337
- 1,928
- Thread starter
- #101
Apparently you didn't read, nor grasp, my comment.No, Archer did not say "illlusion of access" or anything like that in any other words.
It doesn't matter, the phrase is a description of what Hunter Biden was selling based on Archer's testimony, he need not have actually said it.
No, because 'access' implies favors were asked for and granted, and no evidence of that has been produced, based on Archer's testimony. His showing up at a dinner, or calling on the phone, what Hunter is doing is using his dad as a prop. But that, in and of itself, form a legal standpoint, does not equal access in the sense of wrongdoing.It is far from an "illusion" when you have Joe Biden himself brought onto speaker phone in the middle of the meeting by Hunter Biden. That is actual access.
No such message was indicated in Archer's testimony. Illusion of access is a description.That told Hunter's trading partners that Hunter could either 1) get ahold of dad anytime, or 2) had dad waiting for that moment, to say hi to them. The words "illusion of access" did not come into play until the incredibly partisan attorney and congressman Goldman invented it and tried to put the words into Archer's mouth.
I repeat,. no access in the sense of favors requested and granted have been achieved, per Archer's testimony.You admitted that, but now you come back with this silly "sizzle not steak" argument, which is just a restatement of Goldman's invention. You should suggest that to Goldman, unless it was he emailed it to you?
Either you have evidence to substantiate your claim, or you do not. Beyond that,. you are speculating. Speculation will not get you an indictment, let alone a convinction.Again, the Biden's know how not to leave any evidence on Joe himself.
Ditto, above.It would be nearly impossible to convict Joe when they use a system like that.
They did not invent it, it has been the cornerstone of organized crime since the early 20th century.
But that doesn't stop intelligent people from realizing what is going on.
It doesn't' stop partisans from making shit up to forward a right wing agenda.
It may very well be True that the Biden's walked right up to the line, made it squeal, even, but what they did not do is cross the line.
Until you have direct evidence, you have squat.
Therefore, if you go around making claims without evidence, you will be a liar.
But,. the bottom line is, you haven't provided evidence to substantiate the claim that Joe Biden is going anything untoward, illegal, etc.