Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,289
- 13,620
- 973
Yes I think so.Is wild inconceivable spin, considered lying by your ilk?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes I think so.Is wild inconceivable spin, considered lying by your ilk?
LOL This is going to be fun. You guys have to start working on the talking points.What exactly is preposterous about it? They either discussed business or they didn’t.
Trump is indicted because of his own stupidity. Not because of politics.
Not surprised the demafasict are downplaying this and protecting their corrupt leaderDo you have a link to a news outlet because these tweets seem to be wrong.
“The witness indicated that Hunter spoke to his father every day, and approximately 20 times over the course of 10 year relationship, Hunter may have put his father on the phone with any number of different people, and they never once spoke about any business dealings,” Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) said.
“As he described it, it was all casual conversation, niceties, the weather, ‘What’s going on?’” Goldman said, adding that, “There wasn’t a single conversation about any of the business dealings that Hunter had.”
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who was also in the interview, told reporters that Archer had revealed new information but declined to elaborate further."
Democrat downplays Hunter Biden associate Devon Archer’s testimony
Former Hunter Biden business associate Devon Archer said during closed-door testimony that Hunter included President Biden on a number of phone calls that presumably included business associates, according to one lawmaker’s account of the testimony, a revelation that is likely to fuel Republican...www.aol.com
An actual news article will likely have some context not included in your tweets.
Well just shut up and wait for the impeachment trial! LOLJust waiting to see actual testimony under oath and legally admissible evidence with a legal chain of custody.
Goldman is lying. Obviously.
Not surprised the demafasict are downplaying this and protecting their corrupt leader
Should we be surprised?
What business was discussed?Nope Absurd spin. the "business" Hunter and Archer were selling was access to the Vice President of the United States. They were providing that. To say that no "business" was discussed during those calls is a preposterous spin.
Apparently not fun enough to have a response.LOL This is going to be fun. You guys have to start working on the talking points.
Are you going to impeach Biden for talking with his son?He would have to have intimate knowledge of all the calls to be lying.
He is taking what he hopes happened and spinning the testimony wildly, to get close to what he thinks (hopes) is the truth.
He will fail.
Who's downplaying?Not surprised the demafasict are downplaying this and protecting their corrupt leader
Should we be surprised?
No need, whatsoever, to discuss business. All that is required is here, let me put you on the phone with my dad, the Vice President of the United States. Even you know that to be true!Didn’t Goldman say that they didn’t discuss business in those phone calls?
Nice try. He quoted it and retyped it, then you quoted it, so you read it at least three times before rendering your hilariously wrong definition. It’s not an autocorrect typo issue you have there, buddy.Good one. You got an autocorrect typo.
I guess your inability to understand basic concepts of law is okay.
True! That would be beneficial for Hunter Biden.No need, whatsoever, to discuss business. All that is required is here, let me put you on the phone with my dad, the Vice President of the United States. Even you know that to be true!
Did you read the tweets in the original post?No need, whatsoever, to discuss business. All that is required is here, let me put you on the phone with my dad, the Vice President of the United States. Even you know that to be true!
See above. The 'business' is access to the Vice President of the United States. The phone calls prove they can deliver. So yes, the 'business' was discussed.What exactly is preposterous about it? They either discussed business or they didn’t.
That’s not what the word “discussed” means. The spin is yours.See above. The 'business' is access to the Vice President of the United States. The phone calls prove they can deliver. So yes, the 'business' was discussed.
This is a dumb paragraph and doesn't make sense.See above. The 'business' is access to the Vice President of the United States. The phone calls prove they can deliver. So yes, the 'business' was discussed.