Hunter is 100% the victim of deep state right wing lawfare

Look you dumb ass, it doesn’t make any difference if he was under the influence at the moment he signed the form. You’re an idiot.

I’m sure the strategy of the defense is to convince some moron like you that he did nothing wrong.

I'm not the person you should be worried about.

You should be worried about the Jury,


Five of the jurors have had family members with substance abuse issues in the past.
 
I’m not worried about anything fag-weed. Why should I be? Im not on trial dumb ass.
Sure you are. YOu guys have had a hard-on for Hunter for five years.

And this was the best you could get on him.

I could see this jury acquitting him as a fuck you to the court. I would probably vote to acquit (even if this wasn't hunter) because this is a BS charge.
 
Sure you are. YOu guys have had a hard-on for Hunter for five years.

And this was the best you could get on him.

I could see this jury acquitting him as a fuck you to the court. I would probably vote to acquit (even if this wasn't hunter) because this is a BS charge.
Interesting, I thought you supported background checks for gun purchases
 
Interesting, I thought you supported background checks for gun purchases

I would and do.

Asking a drug addict if he thinks he's addicted or a crazy person if he thinks he's sane isn't a background check.

Of course, an addict (especially one attempting recovery, as Hunter did at the time) isn't going to think he has a problem. Of course a crazy person is going to think he's perfectly sane, which is why he needs that gun to shoot demons at a preschool.

A real "background check" would have been making him piss in a cup, or maybe take a hair sample, and making him list a bunch of references (Boss, Wife, neighbors) to see if he's sane or not.
 
I would and do.

Asking a drug addict if he thinks he's addicted or a crazy person if he thinks he's sane isn't a background check.

Of course, an addict (especially one attempting recovery, as Hunter did at the time) isn't going to think he has a problem. Of course a crazy person is going to think he's perfectly sane, which is why he needs that gun to shoot demons at a preschool.

A real "background check" would have been making him piss in a cup, or maybe take a hair sample, and making him list a bunch of references (Boss, Wife, neighbors) to see if he's sane or not.
Of course it is. It’s part of the background check questionnaire, now people can lie, as hunter did, and he will go to prison for it
 
paperwork issue

What they accused trump of doing, citing paying off a porn star as a legal expense, literally WAS a bookkeeping issue. But you nailed Trump on 34 felonies. Who was the victim of that crime? Since when does a crime only become a crime when there is a victim? I don't see you out here making a case that prostitution should be legalized.
 
Last edited:
Obviously the deranged devaints here have forgotten it was Hunter himself who rejected the get out of jail free card deal with Daddy's DOJ cronies and demanded a trial. lol idiots.
 
Obviously the deranged devaints here have forgotten it was Hunter himself who rejected the get out of jail free card deal with Daddy's DOJ cronies and demanded a trial. lol idiots.

As well he should have. Either it should have been the comprehensive settlement that he was promised or take your chances at trial.

Given how badly the prosecutor's case is falling apart, he's going to have egg on his face.
 
Unlikely he'll go to prison. Especially since SCOTUS is about to rule the question unconstitutional.

But I'm still betting on a hung jury.
SCOTUS? What case is that?


He’s clearly guilty. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
 
As well he should have. Either it should have been the comprehensive settlement that he was promised or take your chances at trial.

Given how badly the prosecutor's case is falling apart, he's going to have egg on his face.

Already rigged.
 
Sure you are. YOu guys have had a hard-on for Hunter for five years.

And this was the best you could get on him.

I could see this jury acquitting him as a fuck you to the court. I would probably vote to acquit (even if this wasn't hunter) because this is a BS charge.
I don’t give a shit about Hunter Biden.

Seeing that he is being tried in Delaware in Biden country, I’d be surprised if he is found guilty. After all Joe Biden himself told the people there “if you mess with my son, you mess with me.” That’s a threat coming from a POTUS.
 
I don’t give a shit about Hunter Biden.

Seeing that he is being tried in Delaware in Biden country, I’d be surprised if he is found guilty. After all Joe Biden himself told the people there “if you mess with my son, you mess with me.” That’s a threat coming from a POTUS.

When did he say this?
Seems to me, unlike Convicted Felon Donald Trump, Biden is allowing a prosecution to go forward and isn't criticizing the judge, prosecutors or jury.
 

Forum List

Back
Top