Hunter is 100% the victim of deep state right wing lawfare

You miss the point. If he wasn't on drugs at the time, was in a period of recover, and really didn't believe he was an addict because he had his use under control, then he wasn't lying... he was just mistaken.

And all he has to do is convince one juror to hang the jury.
The Hunter Biden trial is not about being addicted to drugs or being a drug user. It’s about him being held accountable for violating a federal law by lying on a federal firearms application.

I guess in your mind drunk drivers should not be held accountable because they were drunk or dependent upon alcohol?

A junkie who robs a convenience store to support his drug habit should get a pass?
 
The Hunter Biden trial is not about being addicted to drugs or being a drug user. It’s about him being held accountable for violating a federal law by lying on a federal firearms application.

I guess in your mind drunk drivers should not be held accountable because they were drunk or dependent upon alcohol?

A junkie who robs a convenience store to support his drug habit should get a pass?
Hmm.. Maybe everyone should be held accountable for their crimes, including Hunter AND Donald?
 
So you really have no interest in honesty. Clearly that isnt true and you have impugned yourself.
Executing a non disclosure agreement is not a crime. It happens all the time. You're a freaking partisan hack.
 
The Hunter Biden trial is not about being addicted to drugs or being a drug user. It’s about him being held accountable for violating a federal law by lying on a federal firearms application.

Except you can't prove that he did. If he was sober at the time he bought the gun, then he didn't lie.

I guess in your mind drunk drivers should not be held accountable because they were drunk or dependent upon alcohol?
Not really the same thing, because you are intoxicated at the time you are DUIing.

The interpretation you want is that you can find someone guilty of DUI if they EVER had a drink in the last month.
 
Except you can't prove that he did. If he was sober at the time he bought the gun, then he didn't lie.


Not really the same thing, because you are intoxicated at the time you are DUIing.

The interpretation you want is that you can find someone guilty of DUI if they EVER had a drink in the last month.
It has nothing to do with him being sober the instant he signed the form. He was a persistent drug user by his own admission. He lied on the form. Period. WTF is your disconnect here?
 
It has nothing to do with him being sober the instant he signed the form. He was a persistent drug user by his own admission. He lied on the form. Period. WTF is your disconnect here?

The form doesn't say, "Have you ever been" it says "are you"

Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

If he stopped using, underwent rehab, and sincerely believed he was clean, then he wasn't lying.
 

Forum List

Back
Top