Hunter is 100% the victim of deep state right wing lawfare

[jack3]

I've never heard of this term "lawfare."

 

[marvin martian]

Who is the victim in this crime???? Totally victimless crime being charged by a Trump appointed special prosecutor goon which would have been resolved except a Trump appointed judge didn’t like a pound of flesh from Hunter and instead wanted to behead him in the public square. This is the most unjustified injustice of the American system of right wing deep state lawfare i have ever seen.

If they can do this to an American citizen they can do this to us. If this guy is convicted it will be because of the corrupt legal system infested by right wing deep state judges and prosecutors. If Kagan doesn’t fly an upside down flag of the seal of the justice system she is a total weenie.

Also. Why is his wife and family there? I watched the Trump trial and I thought family wasn’t allowed there since Trump had none.

Takeaways from Day 1 of Hunter Biden's firearms trial

It was impossible to escape the presence of the first family, their influence and their long history hovering over the courtroom.

www.nbcnews.com

I remember when you used to pretend to support universal background checks on gun purchases.

LOL! You lost that debate spectacularly!

 

[citygator]

Executing a non disclosure agreement is not a crime. It happens all the time. You're a freaking partisan hack.

Then why did 12 jurors selected by Donalds lawyers all agree he was guilty as fuck?

 

[BackAgain]

Then why did 12 jurors selected by Donalds lawyers all agree he was guilty as fuck?

Shittycroc thinks the defense actually “chose” an all deep blue jury.

What a maroon.

 

[tahuyaman]

Then why did 12 jurors selected by Donalds lawyers all agree he was guilty as fuck?

It’s true that Trump didn’t face an unbiased jury. They had him guilty before they heard any evidence.

 

[citygator]

It’s true that Trump didn’t face an unbiased jury. They had him guilty before they heard any evidence.

How do you know?

 

[citygator]

Shittycroc thinks the defense actually “chose” an all deep blue jury.

What a maroon.

Why do jury trials if they cant be trusted? Remember Trump also lost the trial his lawyers had deceided by a judge as well. Is everything everywhere rigged against Trump? Isnt there a simpler answer?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s true that Trump didn’t face an unbiased jury. They had him guilty before they heard any evidence.

Cool lie.

Look at the lies you have to make up to soothe yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Shittycroc thinks the defense actually “chose” an all deep blue jury.

Nobody said that idiot lie but you.

But it's hilarious watching you blubber and claim everyone but your orange god is corrupt.

 

[citygator]

Shittycroc thinks the defense actually “chose” an all deep blue jury.

What a maroon.

Everyone knows how a jury selection process works dipshit.

 

[BackAgain]

Why do jury trials if they cant be trusted?

Sometimes they can be. Other times they can’t.

Why insist that this jury trial was even remotely a fair trial when it plainly was not?

Remember Trump also lost the trial his lawyers had deceided by a judge as well.

Irrelevant. He would have lost that trial with a similar jury pool. And the judge should nevertheless have allowed them the jury trial.

Is everything everywhere rigged against Trump?

It certainly is in deep blue cesspool states.

Isnt there a simpler answer?

To the nonsense you ask? Rarely.

 

[BackAgain]

Nobody said that idiot lie but you.

Wrong, fuckface. Shittycroc said it. You moron.

But it's hilarious watching you blubber and claim everyone but your orange god is corrupt.

You must be watching your favorite Cartoon Network.

 

[marvin martian]

Nobody said that idiot lie but you.

But it's hilarious watching you blubber and claim everyone but your orange god is corrupt.

Back to the topic of the thread, you don't believe telling a little white lie on a federal background check is really a crime, right?

 

[BackAgain]

Everyone knows how a jury selection process works dipshit.

Apparently you don’t, fuckstick.

 

[citygator]

Apparently you don’t, fuckstick.

Sure I do. You eliminate anyone you think cant be fair and present your case and then you need 100% agreement to get convicted. The fact you think 12 jurors are corrupt and colluded with prosecutors they never met shows how fucking whacko lost ignorant and feckless you are.

 

[struth]

The form doesn't say, "Have you ever been" it says "are you"

Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

If he stopped using, underwent rehab, and sincerely believed he was clean, then he wasn't lying.

Yeah and when you are smoking crack every 20 mins and in the need of rehab, you are

 

[BackAgain]

Sure I do. You eliminate anyone you think cant be fair and present your case and then you need 100% agreement to get convicted. The fact you think 12 jurors are corrupt and colluded with prosecutors they never met shows how fucking whacko lost ignorant and feckless you are.

Zzz

You’re too silly to have any discussion with.

If you get to help select a jury — but all people in the panel are deep blue — then you’ve been presented with only the appearance of a “choice.”

You’re a real ignorant fuckstick.

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah and when you are smoking crack every 20 mins and in the need of rehab, you are

was he smoking crack in the days up to the purchase?

 

[tahuyaman]

Cool lie.

Look at the lies you have to make up to soothe yourself.

I stated a fact. A true fact.

 

[tahuyaman]

was he smoking crack in the days up to the purchase?

He’s an addict. Period.