jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,251
- 29,154
We know there was a phone call. The president has phone calls with most all countries. Are you going to investigate every phone call now? hahahahahahahaha how ludicrous dude.I think Ray nailed it.so son, where is the hypothetical question in this here post of yours? please, show the question mark in yours? this is your ground zero.In my experience, conservatives don't handle hypothetical questions very well.
An actual specific answer would be great, but not expected.
Post 90. Maybe you can help Ray From Cleveland find that.
It's also in the OP. I just restated it differently.
Not that it matters though. We already know that neither of you will actually answer it.
What, specifically, would you need to see/hear in order for you to believe that Trump's actions were wrong and worthy of impeachment?
evidence of a crime.
Name the crime and the statute violated.
Article II Section 4 is obviously what is being referred to. But obviously we won't agree on what would be considered a "high crime", which is kind of the point of what I'm asking you.
Let me try one more time.
We know there was a phone call. We know that Trump asked Zelensky to investigate a political rival. What specifically would you hypothetically need to see/hear in order for you to conclude that something wrong took place? "Evidence" isn't specific at all. That's about as vague as you can possibly get.
What, in your opinion, would be considered a sufficient level of evidence that a high crime took place and that this whole thing is worthy of impeachment? A hypothetical example would be great.
This is just a way of gauging where your threshold is for this impeachment process. I'm of the opinion that there is absolutely nothing that could be presented that would change your mind about this president. You know, the 5th avenue thing.
I don't think I'll get an actual answer to this, but I tried to clarify it for you.
We know that Trump asked Zelensky to investigate a political rival. No he didn’t. He asked him to look into the Crowdstrike info on the DNC Server. You should really read the transcript and stop listening to Schitt’s. But feel free to quote the transcript for that ask.
What specifically would you hypothetically need to see/hear in order for you to conclude that something wrong took place? I don’t need anything. If there is no crime, I don’t need to go look for one, that’s KGB shit dude. Are you a commie?.
What, in your opinion, would be considered a sufficient level of evidence that a high crime took place and that this whole thing is worthy of impeachment? A hypothetical example would be great. I don’t do hypothetical’s, I wait for actual crimes to be before me and then I ask for an investigation of what an individual did during the execution of the crime.
This is just a way of gauging where your threshold is for this impeachment process. I'm of the opinion that there is absolutely nothing that could be presented that would change your mind about this president. You know, the 5th avenue thing. I don’t believe in impeachment, what a farce, what a way for a political opponent to nullify the peoples vote. I didn’t agree with any of them. Not one of them. Tell the people what happened and let the people decide. Why is that not the best concept out there? There isn’t anyone not voted in by the country making a choice for the populace.