Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
I still like this post.
Trolling can be fun at times.
Enjoy...
I merely thought it was funny how you came to the conclusion that you were "disgusted" in December. What has changed from November, October, etc...? Cain dropping out? That has been the only change in the field.
Rationale please.
Trolling can be fun at times.
Enjoy...
I merely thought it was funny how you came to the conclusion that you were "disgusted" in December. What has changed from November, October, etc...? Cain dropping out? That has been the only change in the field.
Rationale please.
Like with Cain, the more I learn the more I'm disappointed. Probably not for the same reasons as you though. I could probably be happy supporting the bottom 2 or 3 but because the party seems to be in a transition period were left without strong candidates.
Any republican that says our candidates are strong is delusional. They are all better than Obama but if they were indeed strong we wouldn't have a new leader every fucking week. Neither party has any true leaders in positions of power. Except maybe Ryan.
Our country needs a LEADER
I merely thought it was funny how you came to the conclusion that you were "disgusted" in December. What has changed from November, October, etc...? Cain dropping out? That has been the only change in the field.
Rationale please.
Like with Cain, the more I learn the more I'm disappointed. Probably not for the same reasons as you though. I could probably be happy supporting the bottom 2 or 3 but because the party seems to be in a transition period were left without strong candidates.
Any republican that says our candidates are strong is delusional. They are all better than Obama but if they were indeed strong we wouldn't have a new leader every fucking week. Neither party has any true leaders in positions of power. Except maybe Ryan.
Our country needs a LEADER
Imagine how you'll feel in November of next year?
Like with Cain, the more I learn the more I'm disappointed. Probably not for the same reasons as you though. I could probably be happy supporting the bottom 2 or 3 but because the party seems to be in a transition period were left without strong candidates.
Any republican that says our candidates are strong is delusional. They are all better than Obama but if they were indeed strong we wouldn't have a new leader every fucking week. Neither party has any true leaders in positions of power. Except maybe Ryan.
Our country needs a LEADER
Imagine how you'll feel in November of next year?
That will largely depend on who wins and who controls congress.
The GOP and its base suffers from the delusion (primarily fueled by 20 years of listening to talk radio) that this country is hard right as opposed to center right.
Therefore, the solution is always "more conservatism". When They get all the conservatism they could ever want (see Bush II Presidency) and then it inevitably falls flat, the solution is to blame liberals (or claim that your guy turned liberal) and demand more conservatism.
Compromise is scorned at. The only solution is to try and amass more power through whatever means necessary.
This kind of cognitive dissonance fuels the party and places it in the position it is in now.
Even if they win in 2012, the party is slowly sliding of the cliff.
The Democrats have their own problems, but the GOP is a total mess.
The GOP and its base suffers from the delusion (primarily fueled by 20 years of listening to talk radio) that this country is hard right as opposed to center right.
Therefore, the solution is always "more conservatism". When They get all the conservatism they could ever want (see Bush II Presidency) and then it inevitably falls flat, the solution is to blame liberals (or claim that your guy turned liberal) and demand more conservatism.
Compromise is scorned at. The only solution is to try and amass more power through whatever means necessary.
This kind of cognitive dissonance fuels the party and places it in the position it is in now.
Even if they win in 2012, the party is slowly sliding of the cliff.
The Democrats have their own problems, but the GOP is a total mess.
We haven't elected a conservative in eons. We have elected those pretending to be conservative.
The Greedy Old People's party can't get fresh blood by definition.
They are all about returning to the past.
Specifically Dickinsean England.
Chris, marxism failed get over itstop fighting for one world bs and join reality. Lets fight to remain a first world country.
A marxist is what a Republican calls someone who is smarter than they are.
Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
The GOP and its base suffers from the delusion (primarily fueled by 20 years of listening to talk radio) that this country is hard right as opposed to center right.
Therefore, the solution is always "more conservatism". When They get all the conservatism they could ever want (see Bush II Presidency) and then it inevitably falls flat, the solution is to blame liberals (or claim that your guy turned liberal) and demand more conservatism.
Compromise is scorned at. The only solution is to try and amass more power through whatever means necessary.
This kind of cognitive dissonance fuels the party and places it in the position it is in now.
Even if they win in 2012, the party is slowly sliding of the cliff.
The Democrats have their own problems, but the GOP is a total mess.
you can vote always for the commy in chief !!Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
you can vote always for the commy in chief !!Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
Great post. Obama will win in 2012. God bless America.
you can vote always for the commy in chief !!Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
No, Paul would remove all the waste in our military spending.
BTW, he's not as nuts on foreign policy as you think. Remember, the President doesn't get to do what he wants carte blanche. He's got a Congress, in addition to his Cabinet, to keep him in line.
God hates gays...It is a sin, but what you're saying is very true. We need to get the hell out of the middle east and stop stupid wars...Yes, we will still have a military and can still go to war if we have a good reason, but war, war for no reason is dumb.
Bill Bennett knows Newt personally and says he has problems. This gives me pause because I've considered Bennett a respectable man and usually trust his judgment.
I remember Newt as speaker and thought he did a good job. Problem is Bennett says he knows Newt personally and listed a few characteristics that bother me. I got a sense of some of them but just wrote it off as personality glitches when put on the spot. Bill however says they are part of Newts core. Ie self agrandizing and grandiose ideas beyond the ones we have heard about. He thinks as many here have said that if Newt wins the nomination the election will become about his past.
How did our party get relegated to such shitty choices? Obama should be so fucking easy to beat yet at every turn its all about the negativity of our party.
Perry can't debate to save his life. And yes I know were not electing a debater n chief but if he can't sell himself on the stage against Obama the public won't vote for him.
Pauls foreign policy is nuts.
Santorum is too extreme for this election cycle. The country doesn't want to go from far left to far right.
Newt can't outrun his past long enough to talk about current events.
Bachmann just turns me off personally.
Huntsman sounds centered but I honestly don't know anything about the man. And if I don't the public at large won't have a clue.
That leaves Romney, the KING FLIP FLOPPER.
WTF
I like Santorum and Bachmanns ideas but it won't fly in this election so WTF is a person to do? Sitting out or writing in a name is a sheer waste because it could lead to another Obama term. He has to go so I guess I just have to bite my tongue and vote for whoever gets the nomination. This is beginning to feel just like 08 and it straight pisses me off.
I know I'll probably get flamed for this post but I don't care. I don't have a job secure from this shitty economy and I desperately need change.
Great post. Obama will win in 2012. God bless America.
I like your spunk. Where do you post all of your prophecies? Id like a few more laughs with my Sunday night drinks.
Id be inclined to agree except for the judicial appointments and other privileges of the Executive that could prove ruinous to the American people again, in the hands of a republican.I have been saying all along that the Democrats should give it to the Republicans and say 'Here is your mess, we will sit back and watch you deal with it'. Run Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert and have a fun time with them making the Republicans look like idiots.
We haven't elected a conservative in eons.
Great post. Obama will win in 2012. God bless America.
I like your spunk. Where do you post all of your prophecies? Id like a few more laughs with my Sunday night drinks.
(honestly, who do you think will beat him?)
AGain, God bless America and Obama will win again in 2012. He does not have a palin he is running against, but he has some pretty close comparisons.
The GOP and its base suffers from the delusion (primarily fueled by 20 years of listening to talk radio) that this country is hard right as opposed to center right.
Therefore, the solution is always "more conservatism". When They get all the conservatism they could ever want (see Bush II Presidency) and then it inevitably falls flat, the solution is to blame liberals (or claim that your guy turned liberal) and demand more conservatism.
Compromise is scorned at. The only solution is to try and amass more power through whatever means necessary.
This kind of cognitive dissonance fuels the party and places it in the position it is in now.
Even if they win in 2012, the party is slowly sliding of the cliff.
The Democrats have their own problems, but the GOP is a total mess.
I agree that there is a battle for the identity of the Party. I think the DNC had the same battle with the 1992 election. Clinton was not as liberal as many would have you believe. Paul Tsongas was seen as the liberal's liberal during that election. The Clinton Presidency wasn't exactly a bastion of liberalism either. As it turns out, the DNC re-found it's footing but the footprints it left are easily seen.
The TEA party is not serving the GOP very well at all and leaving the lawmakers of the Republican party no room to compromise. Those unwilling to compromise have either very short political careers or very ineffective ones. While the former is the antithesis of those who seek power, the latter works against the self-interests of running in the first place...why run if you want to be ineffective?
