protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,195
- 18,365
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #521
Yes they do, AIRHEAD.Men do not shoot other men in the back in this situation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes they do, AIRHEAD.Men do not shoot other men in the back in this situation.
Yo pop, my Apple shares alone are worth several times your net worth...............So you admit you are clueless about standard police procedure. Yeah. Quite evident.I own Apple orchards kid, you are a trailer trash slob. This faggot of a human shot another man in the back because he was scared. LOL you ever seen a police training target of the back of a person.
Nope because shooting people in the back is gutless and wrong.
As for trailers. A lot of good people live in them. Some will grow up to be judges and doctors. And many of them know a lot more about guns and law enforcement than you do.
Like not have women there or cops who aren’t trained in h2h combat? We went over this.
Then he might be fired from his job for violating police protocol, or he might be dead, at the very next confrontation with a suspect whose hands disappear.Nope. Haven't talked with him about it. But he's a smart young man. He would never shoot anyone in the back.
When the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
So cops are allowed to shoot people when they do not know what they are doing. What world are you on?
Grow up jr
Cops do what they do according what the suspect MIGHT do, and when he reaches into a car which has not been searched, they have no idea what he might do. Shooting them is a possibility. They can't take that risk, WOULD YOU ??????You mental inability is showing. Actually turning and shooting was impossible.
Why? There was no gun
Now take your pills
If they go out in the real world and get in a cop confrontation, and expect that they will not be shot (even if their hands disappear), they won't learn anything, because they'll be DEAD.We have some leftists here who need to turn off the TV and go out and learn about the real world
FALSE! Read Post # 139 about the almost identical case to the Blake case. The one where Tulsa Police officer Betty Shelby shot and killed Terrence Crutcher, who stupidly reached into his car, allowing his hands to disappear, and was instantly shot.No I am not. But it is being written by the courts as cops are prosecuted for doing just what you say. And they’re spending time in prison for it. So keep up the faith. Or whatever you call it.
WhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWhen the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
Now here's a question for you. How many times do you have to be told something, before it sinks into your brain ?
So cops are allowed to shoot people when they do not know what they are doing. What world are you on?
Grow up jr
I agree with a lot of what you say, and I do think the cops could have done better.
That being said, you would have to living in a bunker on Mars not to know that currently in the US, cops vs blacks or almost anyone these days, is a tinderbox ready to explode. Blake was being a fuckwit. He never should have gone to the car.
I think like this: Comply with the cops, make sure everything is being recorded, then sue the fuck out of them afterwards. Why do people - men especially - think they can get all mouthy with cops and not expect a reaction? Cops are not robots. Comply then sue if necessary. That is my advice. And yes, I know some cops can be dicks.
This cop needs to resign as no police force will ever hire him again even if he does stay out of prison.Cops do what they do according what the suspect MIGHT do, and when he reaches into a car which has not been searched, they have no idea what he might do. Shooting them is a possibility. They can't take that risk, WOULD YOU ??????You mental inability is showing. Actually turning and shooting was impossible.
Why? There was no gun
Now take your pills
This skit used to be considered a comedy. Apparently this is what todays democrats want.How do you ascertain that this cop "wanted to kill someone" ?, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
You are trying to justify the shooting. There can be NO way to justify it, ever.
This skit used to be considered a comedy. Apparently this is what todays democrats want.How do you ascertain that this cop "wanted to kill someone" ?, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
You are trying to justify the shooting. There can be NO way to justify it, ever.
Your hatred missed the whole point when I posted this skit.
There is an investigation. He is getting paid. He is not suspended. You lied. You are very dishonest and likely ugly.WhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWhen the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
Now here's a question for you. How many times do you have to be told something, before it sinks into your brain ?
what if the unarmed man is a ten year old boy.
LOL you are truly clueless, if what you say is real why is the pig on administrative leave.
Seems you are wrong
This skit used to be considered a comedy. Apparently this is what todays democrats want.How do you ascertain that this cop "wanted to kill someone" ?, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
You are trying to justify the shooting. There can be NO way to justify it, ever.
Your hatred missed the whole point when I posted this skit.
You missed the fact that this is how retard democrats think cops should deal with criminals.
HE is suspended with pay, they are just calling it administrative leaveThere is an investigation. He is getting paid. He is not suspended. You lied. You are very dishonest and likely ugly.WhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWhen the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
Now here's a question for you. How many times do you have to be told something, before it sinks into your brain ?
what if the unarmed man is a ten year old boy.
LOL you are truly clueless, if what you say is real why is the pig on administrative leave.
Seems you are wrong
Link it....and then link that it’s not the norm for police departments during investigations. The cops in Minny were fired. This is differentHE is suspended with pay, they are just calling it administrative leaveThere is an investigation. He is getting paid. He is not suspended. You lied. You are very dishonest and likely ugly.WhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWhen the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
Now here's a question for you. How many times do you have to be told something, before it sinks into your brain ?
what if the unarmed man is a ten year old boy.
LOL you are truly clueless, if what you say is real why is the pig on administrative leave.
Seems you are wrong
This man is a fifteen year old in a mans age, the body is not even that of a man. He is clearly mentally illLink it....and then link that it’s not the norm for police departments during investigations. The cops in Minny were fired. This is differentHE is suspended with pay, they are just calling it administrative leaveThere is an investigation. He is getting paid. He is not suspended. You lied. You are very dishonest and likely ugly.WhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaWhen the unarmed men's hands disappear.When do real men shoot unarmed men in the back?
Now here's a question for you. How many times do you have to be told something, before it sinks into your brain ?
what if the unarmed man is a ten year old boy.
LOL you are truly clueless, if what you say is real why is the pig on administrative leave.
Seems you are wrong