I Call Upon All USMB Liberals To Answer This Question >>>

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...
I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling
 
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

what if the unarmed man is a ten year old boy.

LOL you are truly clueless, if what you say is real why is the pig on administrative leave.

Seems you are wrong
1. Your use of the word "pig" completely deligitimizes anything you might say.

2. I don't know what police policy is regarding minors, but I will say that a 10 year old is fully capable of firing a gun, and killing someone.

3. Administrative leave is generally an automatic response in all police shootings

4. What do you men by "if what you say is real" ? So you're saying that you don't know that police procedure is to shoot suspects whose hands disappear ? Well, if you want confirmation, call your local police and ask them.
The pig who shot Blake looks like he is a perpetual 13 or 14 year old that is not stuck in a mans body because he is still in a 14 year olds body. Naturally he was scared and saw the need to fire 7 shots to defend his little balls
 
Again I would never shoot an unarmed man in the back.
Then you would be dead.
Wrong again because if I were there this fart would not have gotten back to his car in the first place. I am not the ball less piggy that was there

Are you, would you shoot a man 7 times in the back because he was not armed

You are changing nothing with your hate shithead

Go have a coon hanging party Adolph
 
Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

Atlanta- you mean where the cops shot the guy in the back twice because he was running away from a parking violation?

Maybe we need the "Kung Fu" cops. Frankly, if you are a fat cop who eats too many donuts, maybe you shouldn't be a cop anymore. If you are a 90 lbs lady, maybe you shouldn't be on the street tangling with 180 lbs bad guys.
 
Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

Atlanta- you mean where the cops shot the guy in the back twice because he was running away from a parking violation?

Maybe we need the "Kung Fu" cops. Frankly, if you are a fat cop who eats too many donuts, maybe you shouldn't be a cop anymore. If you are a 90 lbs lady, maybe you shouldn't be on the street tangling with 180 lbs bad guys.

I used to work out with a 99lb woman. She had a 2nd degree black belt. The problem was, at her weight, she had to use speed to make up for lack of body weight which cause damage. I weighed in at 175. When we worked out, I only used 2/3rds power and she used 2/3rds speed and we were pretty well evenly matched. At 99lbs, She could take out MOST of the other Black Belts much larger than her. Being small doesn't mean a woman can't do the job. If she is well trained and professional, she will overcome the prejudice that comes from society. If she wants the job, it's on her to get that training develop that professional attitude. But it's up to US to develop the community support to allow her to do her job.
 
I used to work out with a 99lb woman. She had a 2nd degree black belt. The problem was, at her weight, she had to use speed to make up for lack of body weight which cause damage. I weighed in at 175. When we worked out, I only used 2/3rds power and she used 2/3rds speed and we were pretty well evenly matched. At 99lbs, She could take out MOST of the other Black Belts much larger than her. Being small doesn't mean a woman can't do the job. If she is well trained and professional, she will overcome the prejudice that comes from society. If she wants the job, it's on her to get that training develop that professional attitude. But it's up to US to develop the community support to allow her to do her job.

But here's the question- could she take out an ex-con hyped up on PCP? There's Gym Fit and Real World Fit.

I'm sure there are some women out there that can kick my ass, but the reality is, women on average are smaller and weaker than men, and putting women in the battlefield or on crime-ridden streets for "Diversity" is just foolish.

There should be a standard, either you meet it or you don't.

Now, on a tangent, part of the reason why we have all these shootings now is because after those four cops got reemed for beating Rodney King, they all figured it was less trouble to just shoot them.
 
I used to work out with a 99lb woman. She had a 2nd degree black belt. The problem was, at her weight, she had to use speed to make up for lack of body weight which cause damage. I weighed in at 175. When we worked out, I only used 2/3rds power and she used 2/3rds speed and we were pretty well evenly matched. At 99lbs, She could take out MOST of the other Black Belts much larger than her. Being small doesn't mean a woman can't do the job. If she is well trained and professional, she will overcome the prejudice that comes from society. If she wants the job, it's on her to get that training develop that professional attitude. But it's up to US to develop the community support to allow her to do her job.

But here's the question- could she take out an ex-con hyped up on PCP? There's Gym Fit and Real World Fit.

I'm sure there are some women out there that can kick my ass, but the reality is, women on average are smaller and weaker than men, and putting women in the battlefield or on crime-ridden streets for "Diversity" is just foolish.

There should be a standard, either you meet it or you don't.

Now, on a tangent, part of the reason why we have all these shootings now is because after those four cops got reemed for beating Rodney King, they all figured it was less trouble to just shoot them.

Not all women should be infantry or street cops. But those that are capable should not be denied. Yes, they MUST be able to meet or exceed the standards. In the Army, there are now women with Ranger Tabs. I don't know of any Army Rangers, but a few women have gone through the training and received the tabs. They didn't lower the standards for them.

On that same note, any man that doesn't meet those standards should NOT be in that job. And that means physical, mental and professional. Using the Rodney King episode as an example is just a bad example. They could just as easily have put him in restraints and placed him in the back seat of a cruiser which is the accepted method today. And some cops still don't follow that procedure. Once they get him in the back seat, there are no door handles, he can't get the windows down, the windows are unbreakable and the cage between the back seat and the front seat is unbreakable. Let him kick, scream, threaten, whatever all he wants at that point. Sooner or later, he's going to quiet down out of exhaustion if nothing else.

In this case, there were enough cops there to comply with restraining him. And him being on PCP doesn't really enter into the equation. In fact, that's all the more reason to restrain him in the first place. The one cop that kept his gun aimed at him all the time should have holstered it and joined in on the take down. There is no doubt in my mind they had every intention of shooting and killing him. The only reason they didn't was that the cop that finally took the shots ran out of ammo.
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
It's amazing how you won't use Google to save your life or not look stupid.

Here you go.


You can admit you were wrong now. Not going to happen, is it? If you don't, remember this when I won't bother to give you links because you have no manhood or honor
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

Bu-bu-but that's not what Slade saw on Walker Texas Ranger ...
 
Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

Atlanta- you mean where the cops shot the guy in the back twice because he was running away from a parking violation?

Maybe we need the "Kung Fu" cops. Frankly, if you are a fat cop who eats too many donuts, maybe you shouldn't be a cop anymore. If you are a 90 lbs lady, maybe you shouldn't be on the street tangling with 180 lbs bad guys.

LOL, falling asleep in the drive thru window lane is a "parking violation." When you're so dishonest, you're proving you know something is wrong with the shit you're peddling.

I think we have a challenge here, Joe. Your ass is lily white. Commit a "parking violation" by drinking too much and falling asleep in a drive thru window lane. Grab the cop's taser when they come and shoot it at him while running away. Since your ass is white, they'll laugh and let you go, right? They'll wave their hand, just Joe, he'll come back.

So prove it. Do it
 
Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

Atlanta- you mean where the cops shot the guy in the back twice because he was running away from a parking violation?

Maybe we need the "Kung Fu" cops. Frankly, if you are a fat cop who eats too many donuts, maybe you shouldn't be a cop anymore. If you are a 90 lbs lady, maybe you shouldn't be on the street tangling with 180 lbs bad guys.

I used to work out with a 99lb woman. She had a 2nd degree black belt. The problem was, at her weight, she had to use speed to make up for lack of body weight which cause damage. I weighed in at 175. When we worked out, I only used 2/3rds power and she used 2/3rds speed and we were pretty well evenly matched. At 99lbs, She could take out MOST of the other Black Belts much larger than her. Being small doesn't mean a woman can't do the job. If she is well trained and professional, she will overcome the prejudice that comes from society. If she wants the job, it's on her to get that training develop that professional attitude. But it's up to US to develop the community support to allow her to do her job.

When you start with "I used to" know someone who could have done the job, then you know you're shooting bull.

You knew a woman who could do it, so a police force of women can. What a stupid argument
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
It's amazing how you won't use Google to save your life or not look stupid.

Here you go.


You can admit you were wrong now. Not going to happen, is it? If you don't, remember this when I won't bother to give you links because you have no manhood or honor
I don’t see anything in your link about him cavalierly walking through two tasers. Can you point that out? Did the tasers actually hit him? Were they deployed properly? I’ve seen people get tased and they literally go through full body convulsions and flop around like fish out of water. There are elements here not adding up
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

Bu-bu-but that's not what Slade saw on Walker Texas Ranger ...
What I see is you making claim after claim that you can’t back up when called out.... why can’t you just be honest when you debate. You don’t need to make shit up like you tend to do
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
It's amazing how you won't use Google to save your life or not look stupid.

Here you go.


You can admit you were wrong now. Not going to happen, is it? If you don't, remember this when I won't bother to give you links because you have no manhood or honor
I don’t see anything in your link about him cavalierly walking through two tasers. Can you point that out? Did the tasers actually hit him? Were they deployed properly? I’ve seen people get tased and they literally go through full body convulsions and flop around like fish out of water. There are elements here not adding up

Funny how you suddenly learned to read and question everything when you listen to the left news and don't question anything.

You still didn't learn to use Google though.

Again, just remember this when you whine for links and I say you're not man enough for me to waste my time
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
He wasn't "racing" he was walking and the cops were right next to him the entire time.

The woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her you're defending was clearly walking to get to the car door.

Do it. Grab a dangerous guy from behind safely. Try it and report back

There were 2 cops there and one perp. Not only were there 2 cops but both of them were close enough to touch the perp. Why let him WALK around his car from the passenger side to the driver's side and then open the door?

So are you saying that 2 cops can't take down one guy?

And FYI tacking a guy from behind is one of the easiest ways to put someone on the ground

So still not clear. Are you talking about the two cops who took down the guy in Atlanta who wrestled him until he grabbed one of their tasers and shot at them?

No wait, you're talking about 2 cops in Wisconsin.

Can two cops take a guy down? Yes. Restrain him? Not so easily.

Again, Blake had the choice yet you blame the cops. Stupid shit you're peddling. And the guy was a woman beater, felon and was wanted and had violated the woman he beat's restraining order.

But you just blame the cops. Of course you do
I didn't blame the cops at all, you fucking moron.

And I disagree with you that 2 men cannot take one person to the ground and restrain him. These cops had plenty of time to do so before Blake reached into his car.

Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

This wasn't Atlanta.

And yes cops are armed with multiple weapons and are trained to physically subdue people

it is perfectly reasonable to believe 2 cops can subdue 1 unarmed person.

Those cops in Atlanta should be shamed for letting some fat drunk guy get the better of them

You watch WWWWAAAAAYYYYYYYY too much TV
No i hardly watch TV at all.

I do however practice martial arts and I know that 2 unarmed people can almost always take down one person so it only makes sense that 2 armed people can take down one person
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?

I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
Tackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.

How fucking stupid are you anyway?

Now you're just bickering. Pass
And you're just being an idiot
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out
He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.
That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
no it's more like 95% of it
No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?
You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

Bu-bu-but that's not what Slade saw on Walker Texas Ranger ...
What I see is you making claim after claim that you can’t back up when called out.... why can’t you just be honest when you debate. You don’t need to make shit up like you tend to do

Right, I didn't provide a link to you idiots who didn't provide a link to back up your claims 99 pound police women are as effective as men because of the personal testimony that someone knew a chick ...

And you call me not honest and making shit up, LOL.

Slade. PROVE ME WRONG!
 
I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
He wasn't "racing" he was walking and the cops were right next to him the entire time.

The woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her you're defending was clearly walking to get to the car door.

Do it. Grab a dangerous guy from behind safely. Try it and report back

There were 2 cops there and one perp. Not only were there 2 cops but both of them were close enough to touch the perp. Why let him WALK around his car from the passenger side to the driver's side and then open the door?

So are you saying that 2 cops can't take down one guy?

And FYI tacking a guy from behind is one of the easiest ways to put someone on the ground

So still not clear. Are you talking about the two cops who took down the guy in Atlanta who wrestled him until he grabbed one of their tasers and shot at them?

No wait, you're talking about 2 cops in Wisconsin.

Can two cops take a guy down? Yes. Restrain him? Not so easily.

Again, Blake had the choice yet you blame the cops. Stupid shit you're peddling. And the guy was a woman beater, felon and was wanted and had violated the woman he beat's restraining order.

But you just blame the cops. Of course you do
I didn't blame the cops at all, you fucking moron.

And I disagree with you that 2 men cannot take one person to the ground and restrain him. These cops had plenty of time to do so before Blake reached into his car.

Didn't watch what happened in Atlanta, did you?

So these kung fu cops you think we have. You watch WAY too much TV

This wasn't Atlanta.

And yes cops are armed with multiple weapons and are trained to physically subdue people

it is perfectly reasonable to believe 2 cops can subdue 1 unarmed person.

Those cops in Atlanta should be shamed for letting some fat drunk guy get the better of them

You watch WWWWAAAAAYYYYYYYY too much TV
No i hardly watch TV at all.

I do however practice martial arts and I know that 2 unarmed people can almost always take down one person so it only makes sense that 2 armed people can take down one person

The irony you can say that and not get your own post.

I'd far rather get in a wrestling match with a felon unarmed rather than armed. Think about it. Seriously. Why would you rather get into a wrestling match with a felon UNARMED rather than ARMED? Any guesses? Does "Atlanta" mean anything to you?

And you're still stuck on just tripping him. I'm not bothering with your flagrant dishonesty anymore.

Dude, turn off the TV. This is real violence. No one is bowing and honoring rules like you think street thugs like Blake do
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top