I cant believe I am actually going to post this but here goes.

[kaz]

Who cares about that?

I keep asking him that, he has no answer

I don't really see how it's relevant to anything that Melania was a model in the past and posed for some provocative pictures. That has ZERO to do with policy.

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

 

[leftwinger]

Along with the ammunition bills he signed, Brown endorsed legislation that will prohibit long guns with “bullet buttons” that make it easier for shooters to reload,
Right there in the articleAnd I heard you were supposed to bring them down and turn them in If you have the quick reload model You didn't read the article did you you could probably find another article that would explain it better My work is done here Brought to you by Google Talking typing

A "long-gun" with quick reload. Background check to buy bullets.......few other items I heard.

California gun laws: Brown signs new restrictions on firearms, rejects others – The Mercury News

After being convicted of serious crimes people will be required to surrender their guns, but there was no specific type gun required to be surrender. Are you just making stuff up to make things sound worse than they are again?

I have no doubt you heard a lot of lies, but your link doesn't show it. You got any reason to believe it's true? You know, like a credible link?

Along with the ammunition bills he signed, Brown endorsed legislation that will prohibit long guns with “bullet buttons” that make it easier for shooters to reload,

that is from the link. Many links are available. If you have one of those guns you are supposed to surrender "it". No one has. If they find you using it, you are in violation. Not clear what happens if they find the gun in your house on a domestic call? The bill was signed to PROHIBIT certain guns. The camels' nose is under tent. /out...

Still no link to show guns are to be turned in. Why is that?

Too hard on tablet Dog. Its out there. Trust me. Or get help with your Bing. It is very complicated, require registration if tween years. I am not gun guy. I need help on this one.

What California’s new gun laws mean for hunters, target shooters

 

[BULLDOG]

I keep asking him that, he has no answer

I don't really see how it's relevant to anything that Melania was a model in the past and posed for some provocative pictures. That has ZERO to do with policy.

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

 

[BULLDOG]

Along with the ammunition bills he signed, Brown endorsed legislation that will prohibit long guns with “bullet buttons” that make it easier for shooters to reload,
Right there in the articleAnd I heard you were supposed to bring them down and turn them in If you have the quick reload model You didn't read the article did you you could probably find another article that would explain it better My work is done here Brought to you by Google Talking typing

After being convicted of serious crimes people will be required to surrender their guns, but there was no specific type gun required to be surrender. Are you just making stuff up to make things sound worse than they are again?

I have no doubt you heard a lot of lies, but your link doesn't show it. You got any reason to believe it's true? You know, like a credible link?

Along with the ammunition bills he signed, Brown endorsed legislation that will prohibit long guns with “bullet buttons” that make it easier for shooters to reload,

that is from the link. Many links are available. If you have one of those guns you are supposed to surrender "it". No one has. If they find you using it, you are in violation. Not clear what happens if they find the gun in your house on a domestic call? The bill was signed to PROHIBIT certain guns. The camels' nose is under tent. /out...

Still no link to show guns are to be turned in. Why is that?

Too hard on tablet Dog. Its out there. Trust me. Or get help with your Bing. It is very complicated, require registration if tween years. I am not gun guy. I need help on this one.

What California’s new gun laws mean for hunters, target shooters

Yep,you need help. You made a claim based on nothing, and expect me to try to prove your claim? You bet.

 

[JBond]

I Say hold him to his promise to put her in jail.

he actually did not say that you know. He said that if he were president right now, she would be in jail. He did not say if he became president he would reopen the investigation and put her in jail.

Semantics. A independent prosecutor was needed and Obama refused. It may have something to do with him sending email to her bathroom server using an idiotic excuse.

 

[francoHFW]

If Hillary is let off, that isn't much of a deterrent.

What did she DO, again? lol. Except run against the hater bs propaganda party?

 

[ChrisL]

I feel sorry for you people who don't think Hillary has done anything wrong. You are either brainwashed or dense.

 

[kaz]

I don't really see how it's relevant to anything that Melania was a model in the past and posed for some provocative pictures. That has ZERO to do with policy.

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

 

[kaz]

I feel sorry for you people who don't think Hillary has done anything wrong. You are either brainwashed or dense.

If a Republican set up their own server to hide their activities from scrutiny exposing US secrets to our enemies, lied to Congress about it and engaged in pay to play, they would have no problem grasping it. So it's clear what they are

 

[BULLDOG]

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

No.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Hillary Clinton is out, Donald Trump won.
So we know that she is not going to be tried or convicted of anything that would put her in jail, so that speculative conversation is pretty much nothing more than a futile waste of time.he
What we do know is that she is most likely sick, here is my suggestion or request.
What do you say we go ahead and focus on Trump and what he will or will not do vs what he promised during his campaign, lets put the pressure on him to make good on the reasons we voted for him.
As far as hillary goes, she ran a nasty campaign, so did Trump. But now that she is out of the picture, I think it would be the decent thing to let her live out the rest of her life in peace regardless of what we think she did. Lets take the upper hand on this one and let her live the rest of her life with whatever dignity she is able to salvage.
We have more important things to discuss now. As in, just how much of what Donald Trump said was lies. I think we all know that at least some of his promises were empty, but the question is how many of them were.
Of course with me, if he builds a wall, thats all he really needs to do.
but again lets try to leave Hillary to her own now. If she does something new thats different but we have pretty much run her past into the ground.
Like she said during the third debate. They go low, we go high. ( I actually did like that quote from her writers)

F THAT. If we're gonna drain the swamp, then we're gonna need to do it right. Hillary was almost mob boss and chief for f's sake. The message must be sent. Hillary needs to be prosecuted.

 

[kaz]

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

No.

When you make up the Republicans position, then assume your accusation is true in your arguments, that is textbook begging the question. No Republicans on the site are saying women need to hide their bodies. You are.

Women are beautiful. Just watch Fox and you see Republicans know what. It's you who's the Neanderthal knuckle dragger who wants to subject women and have them hide their sexiness. The world isn't going back to that, Archie Bunker. Get used to it. I for one love seeing beautiful women being sexy. Get used to it, it's not going to change

 

[kaz]

I don't really see how it's relevant to anything that Melania was a model in the past and posed for some provocative pictures. That has ZERO to do with policy.

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

And the entire Republican party is according to you beholden to "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader." I read the top dozen articles including the NY Times and Huffington post, and those are the only people they cited as being offended by Michelle's shoulders.

Tell me what "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader" could agree on that makes the Democrat party hypocrites in your mind since you consider that an acceptable standard for Republicans.

You're a maggot

 

[BULLDOG]

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

No.

When you make up the Republicans position, then assume your accusation is true in your arguments, that is textbook begging the question. No Republicans on the site are saying women need to hide their bodies. You are.

Women are beautiful. Just watch Fox and you see Republicans know what. It's you who's the Neanderthal knuckle dragger who wants to subject women and have them hide their sexiness. The world isn't going back to that, Archie Bunker. Get used to it. I for one love seeing beautiful women being sexy. Get used to it, it's not going to change

Those lesbian porn pictures do not align with family values by any stretch of the imagination. Family values have always been claimed by the right right wing until now. I didn't make up your position and publicize it. Your party did, and you are lying if you claim differently. You are being Hypocritical to drop what your party claimed were deeply held moral values just because Trumps wife is a lesbian slut.

 

[BULLDOG]

It has a lot to do with what you used to call FAMILY VALUES. Remember them?

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

And the entire Republican party is according to you beholden to "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader." I read the top dozen articles including the NY Times and Huffington post, and those are the only people they cited as being offended by Michelle's shoulders.

Tell me what "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader" could agree on that makes the Democrat party hypocrites in your mind since you consider that an acceptable standard for Republicans.

You're a maggot

I never really cared what a crazy right winger might think of me, or even if you could think.

 

[kaz]

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

No.

When you make up the Republicans position, then assume your accusation is true in your arguments, that is textbook begging the question. No Republicans on the site are saying women need to hide their bodies. You are.

Women are beautiful. Just watch Fox and you see Republicans know what. It's you who's the Neanderthal knuckle dragger who wants to subject women and have them hide their sexiness. The world isn't going back to that, Archie Bunker. Get used to it. I for one love seeing beautiful women being sexy. Get used to it, it's not going to change

Those lesbian porn pictures do not align with family values by any stretch of the imagination. Family values have always been claimed by the right right wing until now. I didn't make up your position and publicize it. Your party did, and you are lying if you claim differently. You are being Hypocritical to drop what your party claimed were deeply held moral values just because Trumps wife is a lesbian slut.

Can you talk to women? I imagine you like Raj ...

 

[kaz]

Show where anyone supported Trump because of "family values."

You love to judge

You love to label

You love to be offended

This is pay dirt for you, the trifecta ...

No, after years of making big deals over nothing and claiming FAMILY VALUES as your excuse, you somehow decided they didn't matter in this case. That is your hypocrisy, and it will be multiplied if you ever try to go back to that excuse.

So my hypocrisy is that which I said I was against ...

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

And the entire Republican party is according to you beholden to "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader." I read the top dozen articles including the NY Times and Huffington post, and those are the only people they cited as being offended by Michelle's shoulders.

Tell me what "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader" could agree on that makes the Democrat party hypocrites in your mind since you consider that an acceptable standard for Republicans.

You're a maggot

I never really cared what a crazy right winger might think of me, or even if you could think.

Ouch, I'm a right winger ...



Good one. So address the question:

- Tell me what "a voter in Virginia" and "a Chicago Tribune reader" could agree on that makes the Democrat party hypocrites in your mind since you consider that an acceptable standard for Republicans.

That is your standard for Republicans, show where you would apply the same standard to Democrats

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes.To just drop what you claim to be a moral decision just because it becomes inconvenient is hypocrisy.

Begging the question

No.

When you make up the Republicans position, then assume your accusation is true in your arguments, that is textbook begging the question. No Republicans on the site are saying women need to hide their bodies. You are.

Women are beautiful. Just watch Fox and you see Republicans know what. It's you who's the Neanderthal knuckle dragger who wants to subject women and have them hide their sexiness. The world isn't going back to that, Archie Bunker. Get used to it. I for one love seeing beautiful women being sexy. Get used to it, it's not going to change

Those lesbian porn pictures do not align with family values by any stretch of the imagination. Family values have always been claimed by the right right wing until now. I didn't make up your position and publicize it. Your party did, and you are lying if you claim differently. You are being Hypocritical to drop what your party claimed were deeply held moral values just because Trumps wife is a lesbian slut.

Can you talk to women? I imagine you like Raj ...

Obviously,you imagine lots of stuff that just isn't real.

 

[Londoner]

Maybe "Maryland Patriots" might be too young to remember what democrats did to the Nixon administration. You can bet your ass that they would have put Nixon behind bars for the convoluted Watergate conspiracy if he wasn't pardoned by Jerry Ford. Democrats have a built in hatred and vindictiveness that trumps (pardon the pun) understanding unless you factor in the propaganda value of the so-called mainstream media. Timid republicans don't have the same psychotic fire in their belly as the liberal media has so it would still be a victory for republicans if Obama took the time to pardon the former democrat presidential nominee.

Are you seriously comparing Watergate to Clinton's emails? Do you know the factual, legal findings of both cases?

FYI: I personally wish Nixon stayed in office. I actually think his fiscal, tax, labor, trade and environmental policies were among the best this nation has ever seen - far better than any Democrat who followed him. I would have voted for him in this election if he was running. Have you ever studied his actual policies? Or do you just vomit tired talking points about manufactured scandals?

 

[kaz]

Begging the question

No.

When you make up the Republicans position, then assume your accusation is true in your arguments, that is textbook begging the question. No Republicans on the site are saying women need to hide their bodies. You are.

Women are beautiful. Just watch Fox and you see Republicans know what. It's you who's the Neanderthal knuckle dragger who wants to subject women and have them hide their sexiness. The world isn't going back to that, Archie Bunker. Get used to it. I for one love seeing beautiful women being sexy. Get used to it, it's not going to change

Those lesbian porn pictures do not align with family values by any stretch of the imagination. Family values have always been claimed by the right right wing until now. I didn't make up your position and publicize it. Your party did, and you are lying if you claim differently. You are being Hypocritical to drop what your party claimed were deeply held moral values just because Trumps wife is a lesbian slut.

Can you talk to women? I imagine you like Raj ...

Obviously,you imagine lots of stuff that just isn't real.

So back up that a "Virginia voter" and a "Chicago Tribune reader" speak for the Republican party. Stop dancing and man up, pretend for a minute you are one