Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
We can thank Obama for weaponizing the Federal government and turning it over to Trump.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can thank Obama for weaponizing the Federal government and turning it over to Trump.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.What part of it became ridiculously unaffordable do you not understand?The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.Because that's how insurance works. Insurance is there to insure yourself against UNFORESEEN expenses. They calculate a risk and then let the entire pool of people pay a certain amount so that regardless of circumstances everybody is covered. Like I mentioned you as an older person are at a higher risk for health problems. A risk that is covered by healthier people paying in too the plan too. The whole idea that one should only pay for their current health status is fundamentally flawed.
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
the nay-sayers dont want to understand it, they understand one thing, and one thing only ... Obama did it ergo they hate it.
end of story.
Trying to "understand" the law would have served me as well as trying to understand space flight.
Good grief
premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
An inexperienced businessman way over his head.Zing!Kinda like Don in that regard, ain't he.Look how well that shit worked out.
FDR was handicapped by a youth spent in the rarefied
atmosphere of a garden party
Trump's more like Hoover than FDR, though.
It sure is funny to hear a guy who shits on a golden toilet whining about elites.
how is trump like hoover?
Actually, Hoover had some government experience before becoming President. He was Coolidge's Secretary of Commerce. So even he is up on Trump.
Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.What part of it became ridiculously unaffordable do you not understand?The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
the nay-sayers dont want to understand it, they understand one thing, and one thing only ... Obama did it ergo they hate it.
end of story.
Trying to "understand" the law would have served me as well as trying to understand space flight.
Good grief
premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.What part of it became ridiculously unaffordable do you not understand?The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.
the nay-sayers dont want to understand it, they understand one thing, and one thing only ... Obama did it ergo they hate it.
end of story.
Trying to "understand" the law would have served me as well as trying to understand space flight.
Good grief
premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
No fixes have been offered, congress is making sure of that. My point is that you still haven't given me a mechanism why this EO is better.I dropped out of the system and joined a co-op for medical needs.The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.Because that's how insurance works. Insurance is there to insure yourself against UNFORESEEN expenses. They calculate a risk and then let the entire pool of people pay a certain amount so that regardless of circumstances everybody is covered. Like I mentioned you as an older person are at a higher risk for health problems. A risk that is covered by healthier people paying in too the plan too. The whole idea that one should only pay for their current health status is fundamentally flawed.It makes it better because it removes it as a requirement. Why should I, a healthy person, be forced to pay more because someone else is unhealthy?Even if that's true,calling for health insurance to fail is cynical to say the least, considering the bottom line of that equation is human lives. And I don't ask you to re-litigate ACA, I'm asking you to make your point as to how this EO makes it better. A valid question since you started this OP because you like it. I gave you the basic problem. It is an EO designed to create 2 different markets, one cheap one and one expensive one for the age group you belong too. So make your case please?
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
With this I may be able to get back in proper & begin offering insurance to my employees.
And you thinking I should have focused on "fixes" for Obamacare is just silly. I have no power over that law and the ones that do have proven themselves inept.
I already covered this earlier in the thread.No fixes have been offered, congress is making sure of that. My point is that you still haven't given me a mechanism why this EO is better.I dropped out of the system and joined a co-op for medical needs.The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.Because that's how insurance works. Insurance is there to insure yourself against UNFORESEEN expenses. They calculate a risk and then let the entire pool of people pay a certain amount so that regardless of circumstances everybody is covered. Like I mentioned you as an older person are at a higher risk for health problems. A risk that is covered by healthier people paying in too the plan too. The whole idea that one should only pay for their current health status is fundamentally flawed.It makes it better because it removes it as a requirement. Why should I, a healthy person, be forced to pay more because someone else is unhealthy?
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
With this I may be able to get back in proper & begin offering insurance to my employees.
And you thinking I should have focused on "fixes" for Obamacare is just silly. I have no power over that law and the ones that do have proven themselves inept.
I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.What part of it became ridiculously unaffordable do you not understand?the nay-sayers dont want to understand it, they understand one thing, and one thing only ... Obama did it ergo they hate it.
end of story.
Trying to "understand" the law would have served me as well as trying to understand space flight.
Good grief
premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.What part of it became ridiculously unaffordable do you not understand?
Trying to "understand" the law would have served me as well as trying to understand space flight.
Good grief
premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.premium increases reached 50-60% long before Obama was even elected, so dont feed me your horseshit.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
You're a tool sucking the party line
So? Changes nothing about what you're doing here.And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.Premium increases were relative to the risk pool you were in. Yes I saw increases but nothing to the effect of the aca.
This argument is pointless and it's why I said I didn't want to relitigate the law again.
risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
You're a tool sucking the party line
I voted for Reagan and not Obama or Clinton, TOOLBOI.
yep. they are not there to create law per se. that is NOT the role of the president.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
If this executive order stands up to legal challenges, it will remove state oversight of healthcare plans allowing insurers to provide overpriced plans with relatively skimpy coverage. However, that's not the worst part. Insurer will certainly market these plans to the young and healthy driving up prices for those with more serious conditions. It's just part of the Trump plan to destroy the American healthcare system and thus force congress to act. It's a pretty desperate move for Republicans.But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
If this executive order stands up to legal challenges, it will remove state oversight of healthcare plans allowing insurers to provide overpriced plans with relatively skimpy coverage. However, that's not the worst part. Insurer will certainly market these plans to the young and healthy driving up prices for those with more serious conditions. It's just part of the Trump plan to destroy the American healthcare system and thus force congress to act. It's a pretty desperate move for Republicans.But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
So? Changes nothing about what you're doing here.And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.risk pool - bla bla bla
risk this sport ...
Rapidly rising health insurance premiums and higher cost-sharing continue to strain the budgets of U.S. working families and employers. Analysis of state trends in private employer-based health insurance from 2003 to 2011 reveals that premiums for family coverage increased 62 percent across states—rising far faster than income for middle- and low-income families. At the same time, deductibles more than doubled in large and small firms. Workers are thus paying more but getting less-protective benefits. If trends continue at their historical rate, the average premium for family coverage will reach nearly $25,000 by 2020. The Affordable Care Act’s reforms should begin to moderate costs while improving coverage. But with private insurance costs projected to increase faster than incomes over the next decade, further efforts are needed. If annual premium growth slowed by one percentage point, by 2020 employers and families would save $2,029 annually for family coverage
just like said, dont feed me your horseshit.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
You're a tool sucking the party line
I voted for Reagan and not Obama or Clinton, TOOLBOI.
If you are over the age of 19 i have lost any faith i had left in humanitySo? Changes nothing about what you're doing here.And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
You're a tool sucking the party line
I voted for Reagan and not Obama or Clinton, TOOLBOI.
reading RW horsehit.
I retired before I was 50.
What you said is this EO removes the requirement and that this EO stops putting everybody in the same risk pool. How does either of those things have a chance in reducing your premiums when you are personally an older man and you employ people who do a high risk job? Don't both those things likely increase your premiums?I already covered this earlier in the thread.No fixes have been offered, congress is making sure of that. My point is that you still haven't given me a mechanism why this EO is better.I dropped out of the system and joined a co-op for medical needs.The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.Because that's how insurance works. Insurance is there to insure yourself against UNFORESEEN expenses. They calculate a risk and then let the entire pool of people pay a certain amount so that regardless of circumstances everybody is covered. Like I mentioned you as an older person are at a higher risk for health problems. A risk that is covered by healthier people paying in too the plan too. The whole idea that one should only pay for their current health status is fundamentally flawed.
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
With this I may be able to get back in proper & begin offering insurance to my employees.
And you thinking I should have focused on "fixes" for Obamacare is just silly. I have no power over that law and the ones that do have proven themselves inept.
I hear the requirements for trailer park retirement are pretty low.So? Changes nothing about what you're doing here.And that has what to do with my business or bottom line? It's safe to assume your company was not comprised of employees doing a dangerous job or working with dangerous materials & tools. Things that can cause serious injury or illnesses? You likely had a different amount of employees than me thus a reflection in your buying power and cost per employee.I am self employed genius. Purchasing health insurance outside of a group ALWAYS placed me in a risk pool. Just like my WorkmansComp.
STOP trying to pretend you know everything
I ran a business that produced 7 figure quarters, every quarter for 12 years, I furnished employee health insurance AND COMPANY CARS - INSURANCE.. I know fucking exactly what my bottom line costs were.
gueius.
You're a tool sucking the party line
I voted for Reagan and not Obama or Clinton, TOOLBOI.
reading RW horsehit.
I retired before I was 50.
I'm not elderly lol. 49What you said is this EO removes the requirement and that ACA put everybody in the same risk pool. How does either of those things have a chance in reducing your premiums when you are personally an elderly man and you employ people who do a high risk job?I already covered this earlier in the thread.No fixes have been offered, congress is making sure of that. My point is that you still haven't given me a mechanism why this EO is better.I dropped out of the system and joined a co-op for medical needs.The reason it rose so dramatically is because not everybody bought into the pool. I do sympathize that you had to pay a lot more but you are now claiming to like an EO that shrinks the pool even further by offering a different one for low risk people. While you are most likely in the pool that will get its premiums even hiked up more. You don't like ACA, I get that, if you have to pay about 3 times the amount I don't blame you. It isn't perfect but it would serve you well to first understand the basic principles that make it flawed before looking for ANYTHING different regardless of it having an actual chance of improving your situation.Except Obamacare put everyone in the same pool thus eliminating different risk pools.
After Obamacare went into effect my premiums rose 3 fold. There is no rationale you can offer that will ever get me support that catastrophic disaster.
With this I may be able to get back in proper & begin offering insurance to my employees.
And you thinking I should have focused on "fixes" for Obamacare is just silly. I have no power over that law and the ones that do have proven themselves inept.
yea.If this executive order stands up to legal challenges, it will remove state oversight of healthcare plans allowing insurers to provide overpriced plans with relatively skimpy coverage. However, that's not the worst part. Insurer will certainly market these plans to the young and healthy driving up prices for those with more serious conditions. It's just part of the Trump plan to destroy the American healthcare system and thus force congress to act. It's a pretty desperate move for Republicans.But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.