Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
That overreach was achieved legislatively, and should be relieved the same way. Not by dictat.This particular order relieves the abuse of the government's overreach into my healthcare.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
That's the spin being put out by the liberal media.This EO seems to want to create 2 parallel markets. One cheaper one that includes healthy people and one that will become unfavorable to a significant segment of the population. A segment that will include a lot of grampa's.
But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
Look how well that shit worked out.For the record, FDR placed Japanese Americans in concentration camps and Harry Truman sent Troops to Korea on an executive order.
It makes it better because it removes it as a requirement. Why should I, a healthy person, be forced to pay more because someone else is unhealthy?Even if that's true,calling for health insurance to fail is cynical to say the least, considering the bottom line of that equation is human lives. And I don't ask you to re-litigate ACA, I'm asking you to make your point as to how this EO makes it better. A valid question since you started this OP because you like it. I gave you the basic problem. It is an EO designed to create 2 different markets, one cheap one and one expensive one for the age group you belong too. So make your case please?I am not going to relitigate the merits Obamacare again.What overreach? Can I ask how you believe insurance in general works. This EO seems to want to create 2 parallel markets. One cheaper one that includes healthy people and one that will become unfavorable to a significant segment of the population. A segment that will include a lot of grandpa's.This particular order relieves the abuse of the government's overreach into my healthcare.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
But i will say if Obamacare flops quicker as a result of this EO, good. That bill should have never become law.
It's not how our system is supposed to work - but both houses are basically useless.
Same with Obama, the only way a President can move anything forward without months and months or even years of party bickering, watering down or tacking on $10 billion in pork projects is executive orders.
Pretty muchBut I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
I do not like EO's he said
I do not like them on a bus
I do not like them on a truss
I do not like them written in red
I do not like them on a bed
I do not like EO's at all
But I hate Obamacare most of all.
Perhaps you should heed some of the procreational advice to the black community you're always blathering on about.Uh, the Grandpa group is on Medicare!
Hey einstein. Lots of grandparents in their 50s. Some in their 40s.
Impossible? Hardly. Companies will rush to serve this new market. It will help usher in the collapse of Obamacare at the same time.The measure of an executive order is what it actually does, not what the President claims it will do.
Since the executive order itself has not been published, it is impossible to judge whether it is "good" or not.
Impossible? Hardly. Companies will rush to serve this new market. It will help usher in the collapse of Obamacare at the same time.The measure of an executive order is what it actually does, not what the President claims it will do.
Since the executive order itself has not been published, it is impossible to judge whether it is "good" or not.
Except when Dotard signs one.But I like the content of today's order on healthcare.
I do not like EO's he said
I do not like them on a bus
I do not like them on a truss
I do not like them written in red
I do not like them on a bed
The constitution says we must have the shittiest, most expensive, most inefficient health"care" system on the planet amongst advanced post industrial nations?It's not how our system is supposed to work - but both houses are basically useless.
Same with Obama, the only way a President can move anything forward without months and months or even years of party bickering, watering down or tacking on $10 billion in pork projects is executive orders.
There's an alternative to both congressional statutes and EOs. Do nothing. The feds should have never gotten into health insurance. The constitution says they are not allowed to anyway. THINK
Kinda like Don in that regard, ain't he.Look how well that shit worked out.For the record, FDR placed Japanese Americans in concentration camps and Harry Truman sent Troops to Korea on an executive order.
FDR was handicapped by a youth spent in the rarefied
atmosphere of a garden party
Exactly why we need to get government out of healthcare as much as possible.The constitution says we must have the shittiest, most expensive, most inefficient health"care" system on the planet amongst advanced post industrial nations?It's not how our system is supposed to work - but both houses are basically useless.
Same with Obama, the only way a President can move anything forward without months and months or even years of party bickering, watering down or tacking on $10 billion in pork projects is executive orders.
There's an alternative to both congressional statutes and EOs. Do nothing. The feds should have never gotten into health insurance. The constitution says they are not allowed to anyway. THINK
Because that's how insurance works. Insurance is there to insure yourself against UNFORESEEN expenses. They calculate a risk and then let the entire pool of people pay a certain amount so that regardless of circumstances everybody is covered. Like I mentioned you as an older person are at a higher risk for health problems. A risk that is covered by healthier people paying in too the plan too. The whole idea that one should only pay for their current health status is fundamentally flawed.It makes it better because it removes it as a requirement. Why should I, a healthy person, be forced to pay more because someone else is unhealthy?Even if that's true,calling for health insurance to fail is cynical to say the least, considering the bottom line of that equation is human lives. And I don't ask you to re-litigate ACA, I'm asking you to make your point as to how this EO makes it better. A valid question since you started this OP because you like it. I gave you the basic problem. It is an EO designed to create 2 different markets, one cheap one and one expensive one for the age group you belong too. So make your case please?I am not going to relitigate the merits Obamacare again.What overreach? Can I ask how you believe insurance in general works. This EO seems to want to create 2 parallel markets. One cheaper one that includes healthy people and one that will become unfavorable to a significant segment of the population. A segment that will include a lot of grandpa's.This particular order relieves the abuse of the government's overreach into my healthcare.I find it hard to support ANY EO that abuses power.
But i will say if Obamacare flops quicker as a result of this EO, good. That bill should have never become law.
Group plans that no longer have the attached minimum mandates of Obamacare. Plans that can be tailored to your individual needs/wants.Impossible? Hardly. Companies will rush to serve this new market. It will help usher in the collapse of Obamacare at the same time.The measure of an executive order is what it actually does, not what the President claims it will do.
Since the executive order itself has not been published, it is impossible to judge whether it is "good" or not.
What is this "new market" you refer to?
Zing!Kinda like Don in that regard, ain't he.Look how well that shit worked out.For the record, FDR placed Japanese Americans in concentration camps and Harry Truman sent Troops to Korea on an executive order.
FDR was handicapped by a youth spent in the rarefied
atmosphere of a garden party
