Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
No... "safer", as in "safer".Think what you like.Bolshoi. You're so much in fear you're willing to circumvent the First Amendment by selectively classifying religions you don't care for into "un-religions" based on a blatatly transparent association fallacy. That's skeeeeered.
I know the truth of it.
There's a huge difference between being afraid of an enemy and recognizing it and contemplating ways to prevent it from damaging your own society.
Re-awakening and re-militarizing Islam - especially its more militant and radical elements - is, indeed, The Enemy.
And, if things get bad enough with Muslims in this country, we may, indeed, consider re-classifying Islam, so that it is no longer protected by the First.
When Constitutionality and Safety are at sword's point, Safety wins nearly every time.
See: suspension of Habeus Corpus by Abraham Lincoln.
See: concentration of Japanese into camps by Franklin D. Roosevelt.
See: <fill in the blank, for the future>
It doesn't take a whole lot of imagination to conjure-up a Muslim-centric filler for that blank.
It's always safer to Act Now and Apologize Later, if need be, isn't it?
If by the word "safer" you mean "less Constitutional", then yes, definitely.