Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains itI'm not following you, could you elaborate on the difference?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile SiteDisgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
From my link.
The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
OK, in one case someone intentionally removes classified material and stores it in an unclassified area
In the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains it
Goes to intent
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...of-secretary-hillary-clintons-use-of-a-personFrom the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.
In either case she was unaware of its classificationIn the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains itI'm not following you, could you elaborate on the difference?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile SiteWhy don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
From my link.
The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
OK, in one case someone intentionally removes classified material and stores it in an unclassified area
In the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains it
Goes to intent
According to Comey she didn't just receive classified e-mails. She sent them as well.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...of-secretary-hillary-clintons-use-of-a-personFrom the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.
A rather dubious claim from someone seeking the highest office in the land. That she was unaware of the sensitive nature of her communications as SoS.In either case she was unaware of its classificationIn the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains itI'm not following you, could you elaborate on the difference?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile Site
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
From my link.
The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
OK, in one case someone intentionally removes classified material and stores it in an unclassified area
In the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains it
Goes to intent
According to Comey she didn't just receive classified e-mails. She sent them as well.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...of-secretary-hillary-clintons-use-of-a-personFrom the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received.
Like Coney said, it was a case of intent
Whining, actually.Dafuck are you even talking about?
What are you talking about?Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
No, what’s disgusting are the ridiculous lies being contrived and propagated by you and others on the right, this thread is one of many sad examples.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
What is he lying about is the actual question.What are you talking about?Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Trick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Exactly. And the dude took it off the classified server system and brought it home (and the dude chucked it in a freakin' lake - after admitting he stole it.)I'm not following you, could you elaborate on the difference?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile SiteDisgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
From my link.
The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.
OK, in one case someone intentionally removes classified material and stores it in an unclassified area
In the other case, someone is sent unmarked classified material and maintains it
Goes to intent
Trick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
NopeTrick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
NopeTrick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
It was warranted, but they felt too much of the evidence was destroyed to make the prosecution worth their jobs.
Nope. Comey laid it out very clearly. Most prosecutors said Comey laid out a case for indictment but bowed to political pressure not to indict.NopeTrick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
It was warranted, but they felt too much of the evidence was destroyed to make the prosecution worth their jobs.
Conspiracy theories do not equate to fact
Nope. Comey laid it out very clearly. Most prosecutors said Comey laid out a case for indictment but bowed to political pressure not to indict.NopeTrick question.Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
It was warranted, but they felt too much of the evidence was destroyed to make the prosecution worth their jobs.
Conspiracy theories do not equate to fact
You just refuse to pay attention and are taking your cues from Hillary’s friends in the media.
What Hillary did would disqualify her from getting a job scrubbing toilets at the State Department. She never could get a clearance now, but you corrupt assholes feel because she cheats during elections, she's your best chance to stay in the WH.
Lol, when facts fail to support your beliefs just make shit up.NopeTrick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
It was warranted, but they felt too much of the evidence was destroyed to make the prosecution worth their jobs.
Where do you get off??Lol, when facts fail to support your beliefs just make shit up.NopeTrick question.Disgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Nobody would be that stupid.
Hillary is the only person that could get away with it, because she's too important to the Hypocritical Democratic Party to face charges.
She didn't get away with it. She was reprimanded for careless use of a private server. What didn't happen was criminal prosecution which was found to be unwarranted
It was warranted, but they felt too much of the evidence was destroyed to make the prosecution worth their jobs.
Because they are inherently dishonest, rendering them INCAPABLE of making analogies.Why do conservatives struggle so much with analogies?So it's OK to leave loaded guns sitting out with a house filled with kids?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile SiteDisgusting how the Left applaud the 1% being above the law and face no consequences for openly violating it and jeopardizing National Security.
Justice must be blind or Justice is dead. And Justice died yesterday.
Why don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
Never crossed Billy Bobs mind a kid would use that gun.
No....the problem here is you have no objectivity. You are incapable of making unbiased judgments.Because they are inherently dishonest, rendering them INCAPABLE of making analogies.Why do conservatives struggle so much with analogies?So it's OK to leave loaded guns sitting out with a house filled with kids?Close but not the sameFBI Mobile SiteWhy don't you show us a similar case where someone using a private server was prosecuted and sent to jail?
Then we can conclude that Hillary is getting special treatment
Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials
Goes to intent
Never crossed Billy Bobs mind a kid would use that gun.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
53 topics whining about Comey weren't enough, I guess.Dafuck are you even talking about?
