Throwing around all these disparaging comments doesn't make you look smarter, but smaller.
Irrelevant.
Your argument is fucking retarded.
Attempting to draw parity between stoning and administratively not offering a class of drugs is abysmally stupid.
What you said here is not outlined in the 1st. Where in the 1st is the disclaimer that states that if a Religious text involves an affirmative act of battery, that then it will be superceded?
Huh?
The federal government infringing the free exercise of religion by mandating Catholic run institutions provide contraception is a direct violation of the first amendment.
Ahhh, such limitations of the first came later...............in Court Cases which set precedent.
Oh, you think the courts will side with Dear Leader, do you?
LOL!
You missed the point.
the point was - that the 1st, if taken literally, would allow any church to do whatever the fuck it wants.
Court Cases later clarified the limitations on said amendment.
derp derp derp