I Really Don't Understand The Left

I'm not a communist, but nonetheless, you're wrong for saying leftists are only statists when Marxist communism is non-statist. In communism, only private property is prohibited, not personal property. So again, you continually expose your ignorance of the subject.
I didnt call you a communist.
The process to go to s stateless society is totalitarian as you can get. You are not very smart.
As I said earlier, you leftists cant think. If you could, you wouldnt be leftists.
 
Of course it isn't. He is your typical leftist. Long on religious fervor, short on real knowledge.

This IS the guy that has been banned repeatedly who loves to use the picture of Hitler as his avatar.
That crossed my mind a while back when we were discussing something.
Just wait for him to agree to mass genocide to get his politics across.
 
I'm not a communist, but nonetheless, you're wrong for saying leftists are only statists when Marxist communism is non-statist. In communism, only private property is prohibited, not personal property. So again, you continually expose your ignorance of the subject.
What's the difference between private property, and personal property.

Dumbass.

You use words, and abuse the definitions but you either don't understand what you are saying, or are intentionally obtuse.

Either way, you are a cancer.
 
Who cares what that lazy fuck said. He was a stupid buffoon.

Just. Like. You.

Just because you're a worthless, lazy piece of shit doesn't imply I am too. Stop projecting yourself on others. You're a coward, hiding there behind your computer, insulting me. Insult me to my face and see what I'll do to you.
 
That crossed my mind a while back when we were discussing something.
Just wait for him to agree to mass genocide to get his politics across.


Yup. Leftist scum, like this toad, are only capable of misery, destruction, and death.

Every 100 years or so we have to beat them back down again at a cost of millions of lives.
 
Just because you're a worthless, lazy piece of shit doesn't imply I am too. Stop projecting yourself on others. You're a coward, hiding there behind your computer, insulting me. Insult me to my face and see what I'll do to you.


You desire government to do your dirty work because you are a lazy, useless, skilless toad.

I built my own house. You live under a bridge like the troll you are.

Ooohhhh, internet tough guy thinks he's tough!

I would crush you like cardboard you little fairy.
 
What's the difference between private property, and personal property.

Dumbass.

You use words, and abuse the definitions but you either don't understand what you are saying, or are intentionally obtuse.

Either way, you are a cancer.
I've never used Hitler as my avatar, I always use my actual face. The fact that you don't know the difference between private and personal property from a Marxist perspective shows you're ignorant of Marxism. Private property is essentially a business. Property that allows someone to generate a profit often by exploiting the labor of others. That's "private property" according to Marx. You're an ignorant dolt so you think both private and personal are the same. A house can be someone's personal property, so can practically everything else they own. Provided that house isn't being rented out, it is personal property.
 
Yup. Leftist scum, like this toad, are only capable of misery, destruction, and death.

Every 100 years or so we have to beat them back down again at a cost of millions of lives.
Capitalism is going the way of the dodo soon, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence. We're entering the socialist age, thanks to technology.
 
I've never used Hitler as my avatar, I always use my actual face. The fact that you don't know the difference between private and personal property from a Marxist perspective shows you're ignorant of Marxism. Private property is essentially a business. Property that allows someone to generate a profit often by exploiting the labor of others. That's "private property" according to Marx. You're an ignorant dolt so you think both private and personal are the same. A house can be someone's personal property, so can practically everything else they own. Provided that house isn't being rented out, it is personal property.


"can be" I love your use of weasel words.
 
You desire government to do your dirty work because you are a lazy, useless, skilless toad.

I built my own house. You live under a bridge like the troll you are.

Ooohhhh, internet tough guy thinks he's tough!

I would crush you like cardboard you little fairy.
You're a delusional retard, "worshiping capitalism". Sitting behind your computer like a coward insulting people.
 
Capitalism is going the way of the dodo soon, due to advanced automation and artificial intelligence. We're entering the socialist age, thanks to technology.
Actually, we are entering the technology age, thanks to capitalism.

Dumbass.
 
"can be" I love your use of weasel words.
The words "can be" implies the potential to be something. Your house can be personal property provided you're not using it to generate an income or money, by charging rent. That's Marxism. I'm not a Marxist, I'm a national socialist, a right-wing social conservative, who believes a person can own private property, and rent out their home or apartment. We believe in both private and personal property.
 
Just because you're a worthless, lazy piece of shit doesn't imply I am too. Stop projecting yourself on others. You're a coward, hiding there behind your computer, insulting me. Insult me to my face and see what I'll do to you.
1703169323681.png


:rofl:
 
The words "can be" implies the potential to be something. Your house can be personal property provided you're not using it to generate an income or money, by charging rent. That's Marxism. I'm not a Marxist, I'm a national socialist, a right-wing social conservative, who believes a person can own private property, and rent out their home or apartment. We believe in both private and personal property.


Which means, at a whim, the government can decree that it isn't.

Which means there is no difference between the two.

Dumbass.
 
Actually, we are entering the technology age, thanks to capitalism.

Dumbass.
Thanks to the government funding the research and development of technology. Moreover, capitalists benefited from the technology that was originally funded by monarchs way before capitalism existed. It took centuries for the mercantile class to become the ruling elites of Europe through industrialization. That process of industrialization wouldn't have happened without plenty of government funding and infrastructure. You're an uneducated shithead.
 
Thanks to the government funding the research and development of technology. Moreover, capitalists benefited from the technology that was originally funded by monarchs way before capitalism existed. It took centuries for the mercantile class to become the ruling elites of Europe through industrialization. That process of industrialization wouldn't have happened without plenty of government funding and infrastructure. You're an uneducated shithead.


In some part, yes. But for the most part, no. Government has actually SLOWED technological advancement over the last two decades because of their idiotic "green" push.
 
Which means, at a whim, the government can decree that it isn't.

Which means there is no difference between the two.

Dumbass.

Not if that government holds elections and the people remain armed. National socialists have always supported an armed citizenry and elections. Hitler and Mussolini were elected leaders, and for most of their service, they were loved, not hated.
 
Not if that government holds elections and the people remain armed. National socialists have always supported an armed citizenry and elections. Hitler and Mussolini were elected leaders, and for most of their service, they were loved, not hated.
Wow. Your knowledge of history is really bad.
 

Forum List

Back
Top