I wouldn't vote to convict the cop who shot Rayshard Brooks of murder

[Asclepias]

Face it leftists, if Brooks didnt resist arrest he would be alive today. Just like the gentle giant.

He would be alive if the racist out of control cop had been fired sooner.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Great. So a drunk person rolls up into a drive through and passes out. How many people can dui people kill? So along come the police wake him up, talk sweetly to him. Ask if he’s willing to take a field sobriety test, he says yes. He fails. Cops say you are to much under the influence to drive tonight, so they move to take him into custody, a battle ensues, he snatches a taser and hauls ass firing it at the police. How much abuse and lawbreaking are you people willing to take? Huh?

Zero. Cops shouldnt be breaking the law or abusing people at all.

Your feelings and opinions are not the law.

I know. However, he was fired and about to be charged so obviously my feelings and opinions are in line with the law.

He was fired and is about to be charged because the powers that be do t want the city burned down and looted. Sounds fair huh?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Face it leftists, if Brooks didnt resist arrest he would be alive today. Just like the gentle giant.

He would be alive if the racist out of control cop had been fired sooner.

Yeah, we saw how racist and out of control the officers were for 45 minutes.

 

[Dragonlady]

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

a criminal under arrest ran with a dangerous weapon----the weapon being HIMSELF

And once again HE DROPPED THAT WEAPON AND RAN AWAY BEFORE HE WAS SHOT IN THE BACK.

Hence HE WAS UNARMED WHEN HE WAS SHOT

Yelling in caps doesn't help your word salad.
In your fantasy world if a criminal fires at a police officer 9 times then runs out of ammo its ok because he is now unarmed.

If a criminal fires at a police officer and then runs out of ammo, and the police then fire and shoot him, they are murdering an unarmed man. Police are supposed to STOP applying force, if the suspect stops resisting.

This idea that any kind of resistance by a suspect authorizes the police to use deadly force on that suspect seems to be the root of the problem here. Black people say that they fight back because they fear for their lives.

Murder rates in states where stand your ground laws are passed, see an average increase in murders in those states of 7%.

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

Non lethal is bs and you know it.

A TAser is considered a less than lethal weapon.

a criminal is a lethal weapon

That would be a great rationalization for police brutality. Cops can kill anyone based on their potential to become violent and be a danger to society.

Every time you post your arguments get weaker. I'm hearing that only 5% of calls to police departments involve violent crimes. Why are officers armed with deadly force being sent out to respond to the 95% of calls which don't involve violent crimes in their community?

Police could have taken Mr. Brooks up on his offer to walk home, they could have let him call a friend to take him home. Issuing him with a citation for driving while intoxicated. They could have done any number of things that didn't involve treating him like a menace to society, and ultimately, shooting him down in the Wendy's parking lot, endangering the public, and killing a man who really should be alive today.

animals like you ENCOURAGE criminality. The result of filth like you is that none of the filthy disgusting animals who engaged in mass destruction of the PROPERTY OF GOOD CITIZENS will ever be prosecuted-----MAY YOU SEE YOUR HOUSE A PILE OF RUBBLE

DEFUND ALL WELFARE PROGRAMS AND COMPENSATE THE VICTIMS OF BLM FILTH

And there we have it ladies and gentlmen. Another triggered racist who has no problem with police killing anyone who doesn't look like her. I have a HUGE problem with police killing unarmed civilians, regardless of colour. I have a HUGE problem with an attitude by police that it really doesn't matter if he's guilty or not because it he's not guilty of this, he's guilty of something else.

Rosie has decided that because I speak out against the treatment that my black friends have been subjected to and that I have witnessed first hand living in one of the most diverse cities in the world, that she can heap her hatred on me too. Fuck you and the horse you road in on bitch. You and your white scum friends are the problem here. You're the kind of person who calls the cops because watching non-whites live their lives, waiting for a friend in Starbucks, or walking home from the corner store, is somehow threatening to you.

When my son was a teenager, he got himself arrested for speeding, dangerous driving, and obstructing a police officer in the performance of his duty. The Crown wanted to send him to prison for 5 years. When friends asked what my son had been arrested for, I replied "Stupidity". Accordingly to you, police would have every right to have gunned him down, along with his co-workers who were just innocent passengers. All were "criminals" and "all criminals are a danger to society".

He was driving a group of co-workers home from a district meeting in his van. The cop tried to pull him over for speeding, My son had left his driver's license in his other jacket. Fearing he'd get in trouble for having no ID (#1 idiocy - he had 24 hours to produce it), he tried to outrun the cops (#2 idiocy - dangerous driving = felony = lose license), trying to lose them by pulling off the highway, and parking behind a shopping mall, where his co-worker (#3 idiocy - unknown to my son, a guy with an actual criminal record), changed places with my son and both of them told the officer that the other guy was driving (#4 idiocy - and second felony charge - obstruction of cop).

A lawyer friend of mine who does criminal and family law, and who is absolutely the most gifted trial lawyer I've ever seen, got my son off with losing his license for 6 months, $400 fine, one year's probation, community service, and a "conditional discharge" which would wipe all of this stupidity off his record as if it never happened, if he met his sentence requirements, and he kept himself out of trouble for one year. Of course my son and his friend were nice white middle class boys from "good families". Those kinds of boys can get those kinds of breaks because we don't want to ruin THEIR futures.

According to your criteria, the cops have every right to shoot and these two young fools, and my son would not have gone on to spending 4 months travelling, the world with his then girlfriend, before starting university in British Columbia. Today, he's a married homeowner, with three beautiful kids.

 

[Kondor3]

I would not vote to convict, either...

Doesn't matter whether you've been drinking or jaywalking or robbing or murdering...

You flee to avoid arrest then turn and fire upon a pursuing law enforcement officer and you earn yourself a toe-tag...

Phukk 'em...

 

[Dragonlady]

Great. So a drunk person rolls up into a drive through and passes out. How many people can dui people kill? So along come the police wake him up, talk sweetly to him. Ask if he’s willing to take a field sobriety test, he says yes. He fails. Cops say you are to much under the influence to drive tonight, so they move to take him into custody, a battle ensues, he snatches a taser and hauls ass firing it at the police. How much abuse and lawbreaking are you people willing to take? Huh?

Zero. Cops shouldnt be breaking the law or abusing people at all.

Your feelings and opinions are not the law.

I know. However, he was fired and about to be charged so obviously my feelings and opinions are in line with the law.

He was fired and is about to be charged because the powers that be do t want the city burned down and looted. Sounds fair huh?

They already DID that - the people who watching them gun him down did THAT. The people who were THERE.

 

[Asclepias]

Great. So a drunk person rolls up into a drive through and passes out. How many people can dui people kill? So along come the police wake him up, talk sweetly to him. Ask if he’s willing to take a field sobriety test, he says yes. He fails. Cops say you are to much under the influence to drive tonight, so they move to take him into custody, a battle ensues, he snatches a taser and hauls ass firing it at the police. How much abuse and lawbreaking are you people willing to take? Huh?

Zero. Cops shouldnt be breaking the law or abusing people at all.

Your feelings and opinions are not the law.

I know. However, he was fired and about to be charged so obviously my feelings and opinions are in line with the law.

He was fired and is about to be charged because the powers that be do t want the city burned down and looted. Sounds fair huh?

Yeah but you cant fire someone without the union giving the OK. Right?

 

[Dragonlady]

There are differences between the George Floyd case and the Brooks case.
The latter grabbed the cop's taser and punched the cop in the face.
Did anyone here ever think that punching a cop in the face works result in a low chance of being killed by that cop?
People are not supposed to attack cops.
If I'm a cop and a man is trying to arrest takes my taser and punches me, it's on.
And I'm a Democrat.

I would have to examine the details of at the scene. Brooks obviously assaulted the officer and was fleeing from arrest. Perhaps one shot would have been appropriate, but just what are the rules for shooting in this case. Shoot to kill or maim? I don't think it is ever right to shoot to maim.

The rules said DON'T SHOOT IF IT ENDANGERS THE PUBLIC.

 

[Asclepias]

Face it leftists, if Brooks didnt resist arrest he would be alive today. Just like the gentle giant.

He would be alive if the racist out of control cop had been fired sooner.

Yeah, we saw how racist and out of control the officers were for 45 minutes.

He only got out of control when he got embarrassed.

 

[Vastator]

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

Non lethal is bs and you know it.

A TAser is considered a less than lethal weapon.

a criminal is a lethal weapon

That would be a great rationalization for police brutality. Cops can kill anyone based on their potential to become violent and be a danger to society.

Every time you post your arguments get weaker. I'm hearing that only 5% of calls to police departments involve violent crimes. Why are officers armed with deadly force being sent out to respond to the 95% of calls which don't involve violent crimes in their community?

Police could have taken Mr. Brooks up on his offer to walk home, they could have let him call a friend to take him home. Issuing him with a citation for driving while intoxicated. They could have done any number of things that didn't involve treating him like a menace to society, and ultimately, shooting him down in the Wendy's parking lot, endangering the public, and killing a man who really should be alive today.

Can it you Canadian sack of shit. The best predictor of future behavior; is past behavior. This piece of trash has a documented history of violent behavior. And towards children no less. That’s what earned him a 7 year sentence. But you and your shitskin buddy can keep mourning the death of this child predator. The rest of the sane world are just glad he’s dead.

Official Guide to Government Information and Services | USAGov

USA.gov can help you start your search for government information by topic and agency.

www.rapsheetz.com

MAJOR OFFENSE: FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: simple battery
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: cruelty to children
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: FALSE IMPRISONMENT
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 7 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: family violence battery
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: THEFT BY REC STOLEN PROP
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 7 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: CRMNL INTERFERE GOVT PROP
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 5 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: obstr of law enf officer
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS

 

[easyt65]

You’re absolutely right. The detractors will comment that the suspect was shot in the back. I have no issue with that. He actively resisted and fought back. He got what he deserved.

Oh bullshit. If I slapped you does that mean you shoot and kill me?

No but, if you threatened me with a Taser I'd defend myself with my own weapon if I had one and if that meant putting you down before you could kill or incapacitate me you could become room temperature very quickly.

Oh, another tough guy needs to prove it online.

No, just a guy that wants to stay alive. Why would a 'tough guy' like you want to Taze me in the first place?

If you resist arrest
If you attack a police officer
If you punch a police officer...

 

[Asclepias]

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

Non lethal is bs and you know it.

A TAser is considered a less than lethal weapon.

a criminal is a lethal weapon

That would be a great rationalization for police brutality. Cops can kill anyone based on their potential to become violent and be a danger to society.

Every time you post your arguments get weaker. I'm hearing that only 5% of calls to police departments involve violent crimes. Why are officers armed with deadly force being sent out to respond to the 95% of calls which don't involve violent crimes in their community?

Police could have taken Mr. Brooks up on his offer to walk home, they could have let him call a friend to take him home. Issuing him with a citation for driving while intoxicated. They could have done any number of things that didn't involve treating him like a menace to society, and ultimately, shooting him down in the Wendy's parking lot, endangering the public, and killing a man who really should be alive today.

Can it you Canadian sack of shit. The best predictor of future behavior; is past behavior. This piece of trash has a documented history of violent behavior. And towards children no less. That’s what earned him a 7 year sentence. But you and your shitskin buddy can keep mourning the death of this child predator. The rest of the sane world are just glad he’s dead.

Official Guide to Government Information and Services | USAGov

USA.gov can help you start your search for government information by topic and agency.

www.rapsheetz.com

MAJOR OFFENSE: FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: simple battery
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: cruelty to children
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: FALSE IMPRISONMENT
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 7 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: family violence battery
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/31/2014
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: THEFT BY REC STOLEN PROP
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 7 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: CRMNL INTERFERE GOVT PROP
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 5 YEARS, 0 MONTHS, 0 DAYS
CASE NO: 794205
OFFENSE: obstr of law enf officer
CONVICTION COUNTY: CLAYTON COUNTY
CRIME COMMIT DATE: 03/02/2013
SENTENCE LENGTH: 0 YEARS, 12 MONTHS, 0 DAYS

Sounds like a domestic dispute and the kids saw it.

 

[WelfareQueen]

There are differences between the George Floyd case and the Brooks case.
The latter grabbed the cop's taser and punched the cop in the face.
Did anyone here ever think that punching a cop in the face works result in a low chance of being killed by that cop?
People are not supposed to attack cops.
If I'm a cop and a man is trying to arrest takes my taser and punches me, it's on.
And I'm a Democrat.

The mob wants cop lynchings right now. That's what they'll get. Facts don't matter. But to be fair, as far as the asshole cop in Minneapolis.....that was murder.

 

[Asclepias]

There are differences between the George Floyd case and the Brooks case.
The latter grabbed the cop's taser and punched the cop in the face.
Did anyone here ever think that punching a cop in the face works result in a low chance of being killed by that cop?
People are not supposed to attack cops.
If I'm a cop and a man is trying to arrest takes my taser and punches me, it's on.
And I'm a Democrat.

The mob wants cop lynchings right now. That's what they'll get. Facts don't matter. But to be fair, as far as the asshole cop in Minneapolis.....that was murder.

This was murder too.

 

[Olde Europe]

Mr. Brooks was drunk, and slept in his car. Minutes later he was dead.

Cops, presumably the sober professionals on the scene, mishandled it all catastrophically. Most catastrophically was first to lose the taser, making the episode far more dangerous than it should have been, then to shoot without justification since Mr. Brooks was no imminent danger at that time.

Rightards, all about licking the cops' jackboots, seemingly get off on blaming the black victim. And on the boot-licking.

They will never factor in that "Serve and Protect" includes Mr. Brooks. That's not how the police is supposed to work, and they most decidedly do not work that way. They are over-policing Those people as an occupying force. Rightards, following their own Stockholm Syndrome, react with mindless support for the occupiers, and mindless rage against anyone who would dare to criticize the occupiers. That's why several of them advocated in favor of the military taking back Seattle, including recommending Abrams tanks as the weapon of choice. Because, Those people humiliating the occupiers, thereby setting a dangerous precedent... that cannot stand. The racism, the dehumanization, and the death wish against anyone not similarly subservient go just nicely with the whole narrative.

What a thread this one is. Not that it was strictly necessary, but...

 

[WillowTree]

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

a criminal under arrest ran with a dangerous weapon----the weapon being HIMSELF

And once again HE DROPPED THAT WEAPON AND RAN AWAY BEFORE HE WAS SHOT IN THE BACK.

Hence HE WAS UNARMED WHEN HE WAS SHOT

Yelling in caps doesn't help your word salad.
In your fantasy world if a criminal fires at a police officer 9 times then runs out of ammo its ok because he is now unarmed.

If a criminal fires at a police officer and then runs out of ammo, and the police then fire and shoot him, they are murdering an unarmed man. Police are supposed to STOP applying force, if the suspect stops resisting.

This idea that any kind of resistance by a suspect authorizes the police to use deadly force on that suspect seems to be the root of the problem here. Black people say that they fight back because they fear for their lives.

Murder rates in states where stand your ground laws are passed, see an average increase in murders in those states of 7%.

What threat was he to the cop when he was shot in the back?

Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, then shot at a police officer with a stun gun he had stolen from the police officer.

How many police officers have been shot, beaten, injured, ambushed, run over, and killed since these 'protests' started?

Brooks' actions go far beyond 'disrespecting' the police. When someone demonstrates the willingness to assault and shoot a policeman he is not only a threat to the police but to the community as well.

Respect goes 2 ways. Want to be respected by the police, then start respecting the police.


'Don't want none? Then don't start none.' -- Don't want to get shot? Don't resist arrest, don't assault a policeman, don't try to shoot a policeman.

It's not rocket-science, and people of all color are smarter than Abrams / Abrams thinks they are - Brooks was not 'murdered' for sleeping in a fast food parking lot.

This had nothing to do with any protests.

It has to do with the use of deadly force and when deadly force is justified.

So tell me at the time the cop shot a man running away from him was that cop in any danger?

Absolutely. Just 1 second prior to that the cop has incapacitating taser barbs fly by his head from his own weapon. This guy needed to be put down immediately.

Good shoot.

Not at all.

You can see how wide the taser shot went on the video.

The fact is the cops were in absolutely no danger after Brooks dropped the taser and ran.

Please list the acceptable weapons criminals are allowed to fire at police officers before they can fire back.

Doesnt work like that retard. Cops are supposed to deal with any aggression in a like manner. Escalating to the use of a gun was a failure of protocol and the reason his ass is now an ex cop with soon to be murder/manslaughter charges on him.

Brooks shot a police officer. In a like manner the price officer shot back. Brooks had bad aim. The police officer did not.

With a NONLETHAL Taser that missed the cop by a mile

Non lethal is bs and you know it.

A TAser is considered a less than lethal weapon.

a criminal is a lethal weapon

That would be a great rationalization for police brutality. Cops can kill anyone based on their potential to become violent and be a danger to society.

Every time you post your arguments get weaker. I'm hearing that only 5% of calls to police departments involve violent crimes. Why are officers armed with deadly force being sent out to respond to the 95% of calls which don't involve violent crimes in their community?

Police could have taken Mr. Brooks up on his offer to walk home, they could have let him call a friend to take him home. Issuing him with a citation for driving while intoxicated. They could have done any number of things that didn't involve treating him like a menace to society, and ultimately, shooting him down in the Wendy's parking lot, endangering the public, and killing a man who really should be alive today.

animals like you ENCOURAGE criminality. The result of filth like you is that none of the filthy disgusting animals who engaged in mass destruction of the PROPERTY OF GOOD CITIZENS will ever be prosecuted-----MAY YOU SEE YOUR HOUSE A PILE OF RUBBLE

DEFUND ALL WELFARE PROGRAMS AND COMPENSATE THE VICTIMS OF BLM FILTH

And there we have it ladies and gentlmen. Another triggered racist who has no problem with police killing anyone who doesn't look like her. I have a HUGE problem with police killing unarmed civilians, regardless of colour. I have a HUGE problem with an attitude by police that it really doesn't matter if he's guilty or not because it he's not guilty of this, he's guilty of something else.

Rosie has decided that because I speak out against the treatment that my black friends have been subjected to and that I have witnessed first hand living in one of the most diverse cities in the world, that she can heap her hatred on me too. Fuck you and the horse you road in on bitch. You and your white scum friends are the problem here. You're the kind of person who calls the cops because watching non-whites live their lives, waiting for a friend in Starbucks, or walking home from the corner store, is somehow threatening to you.

When my son was a teenager, he got himself arrested for speeding, dangerous driving, and obstructing a police officer in the performance of his duty. The Crown wanted to send him to prison for 5 years. When friends asked what my son had been arrested for, I replied "Stupidity". Accordingly to you, police would have every right to have gunned him down, along with his co-workers who were just innocent passengers. All were "criminals" and "all criminals are a danger to society".

He was driving a group of co-workers home from a district meeting in his van. The cop tried to pull him over for speeding, My son had left his driver's license in his other jacket. Fearing he'd get in trouble for having no ID (#1 idiocy - he had 24 hours to produce it), he tried to outrun the cops (#2 idiocy - dangerous driving = felony = lose license), trying to lose them by pulling off the highway, and parking behind a shopping mall, where his co-worker (#3 idiocy - unknown to my son, a guy with an actual criminal record), changed places with my son and both of them told the officer that the other guy was driving (#4 idiocy - and second felony charge - obstruction of cop).

A lawyer friend of mine who does criminal and family law, and who is absolutely the most gifted trial lawyer I've ever seen, got my son off with losing his license for 6 months, $400 fine, one year's probation, community service, and a "conditional discharge" which would wipe all of this stupidity off his record as if it never happened, if he met his sentence requirements, and he kept himself out of trouble for one year. Of course my son and his friend were nice white middle class boys from "good families". Those kinds of boys can get those kinds of breaks because we don't want to ruin THEIR futures.

According to your criteria, the cops have every right to shoot and these two young fools, and my son would not have gone on to spending 4 months travelling, the world with his then girlfriend, before starting university in British Columbia. Today, he's a married homeowner, with three beautiful kids.

I sincerely hope you become a victim of crime. Then you won’t be so fuxking mouthy about how nice criminals are. And, in the US driving under the influence is a crime. If he had complied with the cops he would be alive. So fuck your too bitch and the jackass you road in on. Dumbasss.

 

[Snouter]

The officer that shot that POS should have recieved a medal for marksmanship. In a split second after the POS shot at officer's face with the taser, the officer switched his taser with his gun and very accurately neutralized the threat.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

There is no obligation to go peacefully that I have seen anywhere.

In every jurisdiction in the United States and at the federal level it is a crime to resist arrest.

What are you talking about?

.

And I will take the punishment for my crime of resisting arrest as rendered by a court.

Again, you switch to a different standard.

The standard behavior for a civilian, that we as a society expect of that civilian, is do not resist arrest.

When doing so puts the life of another in danger, deadly force is necessary.

Until certain members of our society understand and except this standard, this will still be a problem.

.

" The standard behavior for a civilian, that we as a society expect of that civilian, is do not resist arrest. "

Bullshit. I never agreed to that. I will resist everytime I feel someone is attempting to take my rights away. If I have to die to do that then thats just facing the consequences.

And, here is the problem. Right here.

You don't go to the judge to get your case heard. No, you fight with the guy ordered to bring you in.

You will die one day if you keep that shit up.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Only if they resist to the point that its deadly like I pointed out earlier.

At what point does the cop have to decide that wrestling around with somebody who is resisting arrest presents a danger to the cops life with the cops gone being within arms reach?

Every citizen must understand, and it is a standard by which every citizen is obligated to behave, that resisting arrest is a deadly proposition.

What is the point of resisting arrest? Answer me that one.


.

Dont know what that has to do with what happened here. They guy was nowhere near the cops gun when he was shot.

If every citizen believed that then there would be no need for the cops. There would be no crime so please spare me the bullshit.

You tell me. Some cops say you are resisting just because youre protecting yourself from getting your ass beat.

As I said, the end result of this thing is questionable at the very least. It looks like there was no danger or threat to anyone but the cop shot anyway.

What I'm talking about, is when the police officer goes to put the restraints on a person and that person starts fighting and wrestling, do you not see the immediate, highly dangerous, deadly situation with the cops gun being within arms length?

What you were saying is that you want it both ways. You want citizens to be able to resist without risk. You want cops to bear 100% of the risk while citizens can act a fool and bear no risk.

That is bullshit.

.

Again I have no idea what youre talking about. They guy was running away. He was no where near the cops gun.

Nope. I am saying that as a cop you should expect people to resist. Thats why you are trained to handle those situations. As a cop youre the professional not the citizen.

And the cop should be able to shoot them, AND sue their family.



How you like that? We can both be retarded.

.

 

[initforme]

The cop has been fired buh bye. Shooting a guy in the back while he is running away for being asleep is simply dumb. Shameful.