Do you just read what you want to read? It's clearly been said in this thread SEVERAL times. those Christians who claim to kill, or terrorize , in the name of God are wrong and evil. That has NO NONE ZERO bearing on Muslims who do the same.
Why? Why can't the Muslims who do the same be not-Muslims too? Why a double-standard?
You're weakening your own argument by continuing this line of thought. If you want to argue that we shouldn't suspect all Muslims of being terrorists, make that fucking argument instead of trying to obfuscate by throwing the words Christian terrorists around.
You're fine with stereotyping. You're proving yourself rapidly to be awfully bigoted towards people. I'm not weakening my argument, you guys refuse to see that Christians can be just as naughty, but you don't condemn Christianity and all Christians as terrorists. You don't suspect 15% of Christians to be terrorists. Why I should I believe this number as fact if it stereotypes? It's a biased opinion, not objective fact.
It's called hypocrisy, dude. If you can claim that christian terrorists are wrong and evil, than so are the Muslim terrorists. They aren't representative of Islam than the evil and wrong Christians are of Christianity.
Which was what I said pages and pages ago, no one has the high ground, they're both equally in the wrong.
There are two seperate arguments here.
1. If you want to argue that a Christian terrorist is as wrong as a Muslim terrorist , hey I agree, they are both wrong.
But you also seem to want to argue that Christianity has many terrorists as Islam, and we both know that isn't true; so Islam as a WHOLE is more in the wrong than Christianity.
And honestly if you can't admit that yes there are WAY more Muslim terrorists in the world than there are Christian one, then frankly I'm going to assume you're as stupid as Sangha and give up the notion of having an intelligent debate with you; and don't' bother coming at me with something from the middle ages either, I don't care.....
You've offered no empirical, objective evidence on how many Muslim terrorists there are. You've offered zilch information on Christian terrorists.
What you have offered is a link which stereotyped people and estimated 15% of all Muslims are potential terrorists. You're not arguing potential, you keep claiming there are more Muslim terrorist than Christian ones, not potential terrorists.
Stereotypes aren't objective fact, they're perceptions heavily colored by personal bias. Stop holding it up to be fact. You've got no hard numbers on how many Muslims are terrorists, you're in no place to make claims like that.
You've got "stereotypes" you've got "potential terrorists." These don't hold up your claims at all. These aren't hard facts.
You've also offered no proof whatsoever on Islam being more wrong than Christianity. Come back and play, my dear Connie, when you've got more than heavy bias against Muslims to support your points.