If 100% secure border is so needed , what about the north border ?

my friends, the Greeks built a wall around their entire country 7 years before the Persian threat even existed. we need to build walls around the entire american land because we dont know what threats might arise!
the Spartans made fun of them the whole time. Real men don't need walls.
So that's why Obama built a wall around his house?
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
 
We control our border crossing on the Canadian border.
Millions of poor uneducated Canadians are not flooding into America.
The Canadians accept that America is a sovereign country.
 
my friends, the Greeks built a wall around their entire country 7 years before the Persian threat even existed. we need to build walls around the entire american land because we dont know what threats might arise!
the Spartans made fun of them the whole time. Real men don't need walls.
So that's why Obama built a wall around his house?
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
 
my friends, the Greeks built a wall around their entire country 7 years before the Persian threat even existed. we need to build walls around the entire american land because we dont know what threats might arise!
the Spartans made fun of them the whole time. Real men don't need walls.
So that's why Obama built a wall around his house?
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
 
we are told that a wall is a must . If you don’t have a full wall , then you really don’t have a secure border . NOW NOW NOW !

Why no squawking about the Canadian border ? It’s far more open than the south border .

Canada is known to allow immigrants and asylum seekers from all kinds of crazy countries . Then can just wander in!

Where’s the clamor about the OTHER border ?

When caravans start forming in Canada demanding US rights I'm sure there will be a push for a more secure northern border.

I do find it odd that Canada has remained quiet lately. Why is Trudeau not welcoming all those in the caravan seeking asylum like he did when TRUMP imposed the travel ban?
 
the Spartans made fun of them the whole time. Real men don't need walls.
So that's why Obama built a wall around his house?
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities. We have a Commerce Clause. Only the right wing eschews capitalism at every applied capital opportunity but blame the left for being "socialist".
 
Because Canada and areas north of Canada are not filled with millions of poor and desperate uneducated non English speaking people that can't support themselves without engaging in crime and welfare fraud.....

Great. So you can have a secure border without thousands of miles of a physical wall.
 
When caravans start forming in Canada demanding US rights I'm sure there will be a push for a more secure northern border.

Seniors find Canada is refuge from drug prices

101701400-2909108.jpg

~S~
 
let me tell ya: we ought to build a wall between California and the rest of the nation, my friends.
 
So that's why Obama built a wall around his house?
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities. We have a Commerce Clause. Only the right wing eschews capitalism at every applied capital opportunity but blame the left for being "socialist".
Ya, we're going to build new cities and let illegals live there while we live in older cities. Are you being stoopid on purpose?
 
The Spartans knew the difference between public property and private property. Only the right wing is that legally clueless and that legally Causeless.
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities. We have a Commerce Clause. Only the right wing eschews capitalism at every applied capital opportunity but blame the left for being "socialist".
Ya, we're going to build new cities and let illegals live there while we live in older cities. Are you being stoopid on purpose?
that is Your story, bro. it really is dumb enough for the right wing.
 
Why does Oprah have a wall around her house if walls are no good?
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities. We have a Commerce Clause. Only the right wing eschews capitalism at every applied capital opportunity but blame the left for being "socialist".
Ya, we're going to build new cities and let illegals live there while we live in older cities. Are you being stoopid on purpose?
that is Your story, bro. it really is dumb enough for the right wing.
You're the doofus who said "Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities". You want us to build them NEW CITIES!!!!!! :lmao:
 
Sounds reasonable to me. We can do like Mexico and shuttle the caravans all the way north, let them storm into Canada. Trudeau will be happy. We could go the extra mile (or 1300 miles) and provide bus transportation, at least in the winter.
 
we are told that a wall is a must . If you don’t have a full wall , then you really don’t have a secure border . NOW NOW NOW !

Why no squawking about the Canadian border ? It’s far more open than the south border .

Canada is known to allow immigrants and asylum seekers from all kinds of crazy countries . Then can just wander in!

Where’s the clamor about the OTHER border ?

Because there are far fewer illegals coming from there. You know this and pretty much everyone knows this.

Yes, once the Muslims take over Canada, we will need a other wall. It will still be a few decades.

Because there are far fewer illegals coming from there. You know this and pretty much everyone knows this.

Sure. Just not an insignificant number.
Nearly half of illegal aliens living in the US are those that have over-stayed their visas.
Canadians are the largest group among them.
 
Here is an example of the old Marxist tactic “hang them with their own rules...by taking their rules to logical absurdities “

Just ignore them and remember that there can’t be a middle ground with propaganda.
 
Sounds reasonable to me. We can do like Mexico and shuttle the caravans all the way north, let them storm into Canada. Trudeau will be happy. We could go the extra mile (or 1300 miles) and provide bus transportation, at least in the winter.
Messikins are allergic to snow. Very few beaners in Canada.
 
And they always start with a fake quote that they insist you take up and defend.
“A 100% secure border” lol. Don’t let them use newspeak to take your ability to communicate away.
 
she is a woman.
So the wall with Messiko won't protect any women? :blowpop:
Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities. We have a Commerce Clause. Only the right wing eschews capitalism at every applied capital opportunity but blame the left for being "socialist".
Ya, we're going to build new cities and let illegals live there while we live in older cities. Are you being stoopid on purpose?
that is Your story, bro. it really is dumb enough for the right wing.
You're the doofus who said "Building new Cities could divert asylum seekers to those new cities". You want us to build them NEW CITIES!!!!!! :lmao:
it merely requires a petty cash fund for that purpose. only lousy capitalists lose money on public policies.
 
Sounds reasonable to me. We can do like Mexico and shuttle the caravans all the way north, let them storm into Canada. Trudeau will be happy. We could go the extra mile (or 1300 miles) and provide bus transportation, at least in the winter.
Messikins are allergic to snow. Very few beaners in Canada.
i love modern textile technologies.
 
Canada is a socialist paradise with free everything and tough laws on political correctness and no right to keep and bear arms so why would anybody want to leave that winter wonderland that sells milk in bags?

They ain't taco eating Mexicans looking to sign up for Kalifornia's welfare, are they?
I like tacos. I wish we had a taco truck on every corner.
 

Forum List

Back
Top