If a few cells on MARS would be considered “Life on MARS”, why isn’t a human zygote “Life”?

Seems contradictory to me.

Who said a zygote isn't "life"? The question is whether it's a person, with legal rights.

I am for a woman’s right to choose, but to call it anything but a woman’s right to choose to murder thier baby seems disingenuous.

Is it "murder" when you take a shit? You're flushing living organisms from your body, down the toilet, every time you do.


So now you are equating taking a dump to having a baby..Kind if sexist no?

Sexist? What... are you... wait. You must be a Trump supporter. Amiright?
 
It is always hard to make sense of the Liberal's zeal to kill children.

By the way stupid immoral Moon Bats, by the time any woman discovers that she is pregnant the child has advanced beyond the zygote stage. By the time the child is murdered it is well along in human development.
 
Liberals have as hard a time understanding biology as they have understanding economics, history, the Constitution, ethics or climate science.
 
If you're against abortion, it's simple, don't have one. See how choice works?

Exactly.

I said I am pro choice. The point is disingenuous to say it’s not life that is being killed from an abortion.

The pussyhat crowd wants to say it’s not life.

They use stupid terms like "potential" life.

You all are equivocating on different usages of the word life. We're discussing biological life - (life on mars, or living cells or bacteria). The question of abortion isn't whether a zygote is living tissue, of course it is. The question is whether it's a person with rights that the government should protect.
 
Feminists and their babies can not be considered living. They are NPCs.
NPC? Nin Poop Com?
Non Playable Characters grandpa.
Is that some sort of Dungeons & Dragons reference?
Video games gramps.

Actually, gramps is right, kiddo. NPC comes from table top RPGS. Video games borrowed the term later when they tried to emulate roleplaying games. Try to keep up.
 
Mind limited liberals call for a woman to be able to choose. But they don't give the unborn child a choice do they?
 
Feminists and their babies can not be considered living. They are NPCs.
NPC? Nin Poop Com?
Non Playable Characters grandpa.
Is that some sort of Dungeons & Dragons reference?
Video games gramps.

Actually, gramps is right, kiddo. NPC comes from table top RPGS. Video games borrowed the term later when they tried to emulate roleplaying games. Try to keep up.
That is technically true because of the layout, but Dungeon and Dragons heavily emphasizes PCs.

In a RPG video game NPCs are increasingly involved in the gameplay itself.
 
If you're against abortion, it's simple, don't have one. See how choice works?
“If you’re against rape, don’t rape anyone, but don’t tell others not to do so. If you’re against murder, don’t murder anyone, but don’t tell others not to murder. If you’re against slavery, don’t own a slave… But don’t tell others not to.”
You mean don't rape yourself, don't kill yourself and don't enslave yourself.
No, when you have an abortion, you’re not killing yourself, you’re killing SOMEONE ELSE. Just like when you rape someone, you’re raping someone else.

So please stop with the “if you don’t want to have an abortion don’t have one” BS. The same thing was probably said about slavery.
Sorry, but not everyone agrees with you that it's "someone else", you have to let people choose for themselves how they view it. It's all part of being "pro-choice". So are you still pro-choice?

A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being. You can argue that is not a “person” but you cannot argue that is not a human being without looking like a complete idiot. And the bottom line is, all living human beings are persons, with value. The preborn baby doesn’t go from being trash to a precious valuable being the second his head pops out. Grow up.
 
NPC? Nin Poop Com?
Non Playable Characters grandpa.
Is that some sort of Dungeons & Dragons reference?
Video games gramps.

Actually, gramps is right, kiddo. NPC comes from table top RPGS. Video games borrowed the term later when they tried to emulate roleplaying games. Try to keep up.
That is technically true because of the layout, but Dungeon and Dragons heavily emphasizes PCs.

In a RPG video game NPCs are increasingly involved in the gameplay itself.

??? "because of the layout"? Wouldn't it just be easier to apologize to "gramps" and admit that he was right, and you are wrong?
 
A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Of course there's a "question". It's the same question we ask when someone is brain dead. We even call them "vegetables" to emphasize the point. The key being that a human being is more than a lump of living flesh. The thing that makes a human being is a mind. Without that, a human body isn't complete - not a human being. It's just a lump of cells.
 
A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Of course there's a "question". It's the same question we ask when someone is brain dead. We even call them "vegetables" to emphasize the point. The key being that a human being is more than a lump of living flesh. The thing that makes a human being is a mind. Without that, a human body isn't complete - not a human being. It's just a lump of cells.

No, from a scientific standpoint that is not what makes us human beings. That is simply your opinion, and it’s completely arbitrary. Genetically, in our DNA, we are human beings from the very beginning. Everything that makes us a unique, individual human being is there, in our DNA, it simply needs to grow and develop.

And the fact that you would compare a pre-born baby to a brain dead individual on the verge of death just goes to show how warped your thinking is on this issue.
 
Mind limited liberals call for a woman to be able to choose. But they don't give the unborn child a choice do they?
I dunno, why don't you ask a fetus and report back?
 
A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Of course there's a "question". It's the same question we ask when someone is brain dead. We even call them "vegetables" to emphasize the point. The key being that a human being is more than a lump of living flesh. The thing that makes a human being is a mind. Without that, a human body isn't complete - not a human being. It's just a lump of cells.

No, from a scientific standpoint that is not what makes us human beings. That is simply your opinion, and it’s completely arbitrary. Genetically, in our DNA, we are human beings from the very beginning. Everything that makes us a unique, individual human being is there, in our DNA, it simply needs to grow and develop.

I guess you never trim your toenails, eh?
 
A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Of course there's a "question". It's the same question we ask when someone is brain dead. We even call them "vegetables" to emphasize the point. The key being that a human being is more than a lump of living flesh. The thing that makes a human being is a mind. Without that, a human body isn't complete - not a human being. It's just a lump of cells.

No, from a scientific standpoint that is not what makes us human beings. That is simply your opinion, and it’s completely arbitrary. Genetically, in our DNA, we are human beings from the very beginning. Everything that makes us a unique, individual human being is there, in our DNA, it simply needs to grow and develop.

I guess you never trim your toenails, eh?

Are you really that ignorant? Do you really not understand the difference between a fetus and a skin cell? I mean, I am truly amazed that anyone could be that ignorant, but whenever we have these types of debates, there are always a few.
 
If you're against abortion, it's simple, don't have one. See how choice works?
“If you’re against rape, don’t rape anyone, but don’t tell others not to do so. If you’re against murder, don’t murder anyone, but don’t tell others not to murder. If you’re against slavery, don’t own a slave… But don’t tell others not to.”
You mean don't rape yourself, don't kill yourself and don't enslave yourself.
No, when you have an abortion, you’re not killing yourself, you’re killing SOMEONE ELSE. Just like when you rape someone, you’re raping someone else.

So please stop with the “if you don’t want to have an abortion don’t have one” BS. The same thing was probably said about slavery.
Sorry, but not everyone agrees with you that it's "someone else", you have to let people choose for themselves how they view it. It's all part of being "pro-choice". So are you still pro-choice?

A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being. You can argue that is not a “person” but you cannot argue that is not a human being without looking like a complete idiot. And the bottom line is, all living human beings are persons, with value. The preborn baby doesn’t go from being trash to a precious valuable being the second his head pops out. Grow up.
You're wrong, but you don't need to take my word, here, chomp on this:
human being | Definition of human being in English by Oxford Dictionaries
 
“If you’re against rape, don’t rape anyone, but don’t tell others not to do so. If you’re against murder, don’t murder anyone, but don’t tell others not to murder. If you’re against slavery, don’t own a slave… But don’t tell others not to.”
You mean don't rape yourself, don't kill yourself and don't enslave yourself.
No, when you have an abortion, you’re not killing yourself, you’re killing SOMEONE ELSE. Just like when you rape someone, you’re raping someone else.

So please stop with the “if you don’t want to have an abortion don’t have one” BS. The same thing was probably said about slavery.
Sorry, but not everyone agrees with you that it's "someone else", you have to let people choose for themselves how they view it. It's all part of being "pro-choice". So are you still pro-choice?

A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being. You can argue that is not a “person” but you cannot argue that is not a human being without looking like a complete idiot. And the bottom line is, all living human beings are persons, with value. The preborn baby doesn’t go from being trash to a precious valuable being the second his head pops out. Grow up.
You're wrong, but you don't need to take my word, here, chomp on this:
human being | Definition of human being in English by Oxford Dictionaries
Yup, and a pre-born is a member of the human species. If you want I can round up some quotes for you, from biologists and medical textbooks.
 
A baby in the womb is either a human being or not. It’s not a matter of personal taste or whatever we want it to be. From a scientific standpoint, there is absolutely no question that the baby in the womb is a human being.

Of course there's a "question". It's the same question we ask when someone is brain dead. We even call them "vegetables" to emphasize the point. The key being that a human being is more than a lump of living flesh. The thing that makes a human being is a mind. Without that, a human body isn't complete - not a human being. It's just a lump of cells.

No, from a scientific standpoint that is not what makes us human beings. That is simply your opinion, and it’s completely arbitrary. Genetically, in our DNA, we are human beings from the very beginning. Everything that makes us a unique, individual human being is there, in our DNA, it simply needs to grow and develop.

I guess you never trim your toenails, eh?

Are you really that ignorant? Do you really not understand the difference between a fetus and a skin cell?

Do you understand the difference between a zygote and a living person? I'm gonna guess not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top