If "collusion" is such a crime, then why have Democrats cornered the market on it?

[RealDave]

Oh
Yet another "but...but...but" attempt by a dumbass Trumpette to give Trump's collusion cover.

It is one thing to work with Russia to accomplish something for the US that voters would like.

It is another to work with Russian hackers to spread misinformation in directed locations to win an election.

Yet no one has made a credible case that any votes were changed.

They sure have: The Election Was Stolen – Here’s How... - Greg Palast

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX_w2KK3i00



Analysis | This anti-voter-fraud program gets it wrong over 99 percent of the time. The GOP wants to take it nationwide.

Oh
Yet another "but...but...but" attempt by a dumbass Trumpette to give Trump's collusion cover.

It is one thing to work with Russia to accomplish something for the US that voters would like.

It is another to work with Russian hackers to spread misinformation in directed locations to win an election.

Yet no one has made a credible case that any votes were changed.

They sure have: The Election Was Stolen – Here’s How... - Greg Palast

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX_w2KK3i00



Analysis | This anti-voter-fraud program gets it wrong over 99 percent of the time. The GOP wants to take it nationwide.

ttps://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/new-cambridge-analytica-revelations-connect-trump-russia-dots-1250043459593?playlist=associated

There Are 868 Fewer Places to Vote in 2016 Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act

Is this enough, or do you need more?

Well excuuuuse me! Did you forget about ACORN and all the PROVEN massive voter fraud and suppression that the corrupt, crooked Democratic party and their puppets in the media engage in, every single fuckin' election?

There was no voter fraud with ACORN you stupid fuck.

There were a couple found guilty of voter registration fraud. None of those in question led to ny illegal voting.

You deserve Trump You are both dumber rthan shit.,

NO voter fraud?! Ha ha ha! You Leftards are quite an entertaining, delusional, yet mentally ill bunch!
Report: Is ACORN Intentionally Structured As a Criminal Enterprise? - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

18 Former ACORN Workers Have Been Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud

ttps://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/new-cambridge-analytica-revelations-connect-trump-russia-dots-1250043459593?playlist=associated

There Are 868 Fewer Places to Vote in 2016 Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act

Is this enough, or do you need more?

Well excuuuuse me! Did you forget about ACORN and all the PROVEN massive voter fraud and suppression that the corrupt, crooked Democratic party and their puppets in the media engage in, every single fuckin' election?

There was no voter fraud with ACORN you stupid fuck.

There were a couple found guilty of voter registration fraud. None of those in question led to ny illegal voting.

You deserve Trump You are both dumber rthan shit.,

NO voter fraud?! Ha ha ha! You Leftards are quite an entertaining, delusional, yet mentally ill bunch!
Report: Is ACORN Intentionally Structured As a Criminal Enterprise? - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

18 Former ACORN Workers Have Been Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud

Sounds like you guys have decided Trump colluded and you are trying to make it sound not so bad. Sad state we are in

Sounds like you have been watching too much CNN....

Sounds like you watch too muck Fox/Breitbart.

And why not, even according to Leftard fake news WAPO, FOX is the most trusted national news network, and second most trusted in the world.

New survey shows Fox News more trusted than MSNBC, CNN

Fox News is the most trusted national news channel. And it’s not that close.

Which is why it is continually rated the most watched:
Q1 2018 Ratings: Fox News Remains No. 1 on Cable Television

And now we go back to the regular programming found on most fake news outlefts: The Russians! The Russians!

Dang, they never get, do they?!

Because there are so many of you ignorant Trumpettes & who actually are sofa king stupid that you believeTrump & hisrantson Fake News.

Right, most of the country including some Democrats that trust FOX overwhelmingly over fake news CNN and MSNBC are ignorant and irredeemable. This must be Hillary as posing as RealShmuckDave!

Voter fraud is when actual illegal votes are made. This did not happen.

Voter registration fraud is when you falsify registration forms or illegally not submit them. This is what a couple ACORN members did. They were paid by the number of registrations they turned in & they went tothe phone book. None were used to actually vote.



In your Fox News article, they duped you by using the term election fraud. It worked & iou are wrong.

 

[Roudy]

So let's this straight, Hillary can collude and pay "legally" for a fake dossier created by the KJB in order to use it against her opponent, both before and after the election, but Don Jr. Can't meet with a Russian lawyer who says she has dirt in the Hillary campaign? Ha ha ha. Ya gotta love the Leftard logic!

Hillary PAID to have a foreign agent smear Donald Trump right before the election and hid what she was doing by going through a "cut out" law firm!
Hillary didn't pay any foreign agents and the information from the dossier was not used during the campaign.

Did the junior Trump use anything from the meeting with the Russian against Hillary in the campaign?

Irrelevant argument. Any attempt to defraud the U.S.in a presidential election with a foreign adversary is a crime. Whether you've got something or not.

Getting true opposition research (dirt) from a foreign source is not necessarily illegal. Having a meeting about the possibility of obtaining opposition research is definitely legal if the meeting turns out to have nothing to do with opposition research once it is held.

This is so unbelievably stupid and wrong. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

You people have got to start educating yourselves. Stop being stupid.

Exactly what Hillary and the Dems are guilty of, many times over!

 

[JoeMoma]

So let's this straight, Hillary can collude and pay "legally" for a fake dossier created by the KJB in order to use it against her opponent, both before and after the election, but Don Jr. Can't meet with a Russian lawyer who says she has dirt in the Hillary campaign? Ha ha ha. Ya gotta love the Leftard logic!

Hillary PAID to have a foreign agent smear Donald Trump right before the election and hid what she was doing by going through a "cut out" law firm!
Hillary didn't pay any foreign agents and the information from the dossier was not used during the campaign.

Did the junior Trump use anything from the meeting with the Russian against Hillary in the campaign?

Irrelevant argument. Any attempt to defraud the U.S.in a presidential election with a foreign adversary is a crime. Whether you've got something or not.

Getting true opposition research (dirt) from a foreign source is not necessarily illegal. Having a meeting about the possibility of obtaining opposition research is definitely legal if the meeting turns out to have nothing to do with opposition research once it is held.

This is so unbelievably stupid and wrong. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

You people have got to start educating yourselves. Stop being stupid.

Providing information does not equate to defrauding.

 

[WTP]

Why did Democrats beg for Russian interference over six times in several US elections, including when Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?

Kennedy-KGB collaboration

5 Times Democrats Tried To Work With The Russians To Swing Elections

Collusion? What About Chinagate and Ted Kennedy's Outreach to the USSR? | RealClearPolitics

Carr: Forget Donald Trump, Teddy Kennedy was Moscow’s bestie

Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?
Fake News.
So why should I believe any the rest of these links?
Hillary's campaign LEGALLY paid for LEGAL opposition research on Trump's business dealings in Russia. That's compared to having a private meeting with the highest ranking members of the Trump campaign and a handful of Russians proposing to "help" Trump win the election.

Likewise, parts of that dossier were clearly unverified, so why should I believe any of it? See how that works?

In a court of LAW, not the court of Liberal Opinion, in order to nullify a document or source all you need to do in prove that one claim or allegation in said document is false or unsubstantiated. Period. Funny thing is Obama and the Dems took this criminally obtained document and used it to SPY on the Trump campaign. And yet, it is the Trump campaign that is the focus of collusion!

Why is it not surprising that the Left is willing to stomp on our constitution, (like it regularly does the flag and the anthem), and engage in fascistic police state tactics?

Where is your proof that the Dems and Obama used this document to spy on the Trump cam paign? I thought the FBI used it to spy on the Russians and Page?

 

[Roudy]

Yet no one has made a credible case that any votes were changed.

They sure have: The Election Was Stolen – Here’s How... - Greg Palast

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX_w2KK3i00



Analysis | This anti-voter-fraud program gets it wrong over 99 percent of the time. The GOP wants to take it nationwide.

NO voter fraud?! Ha ha ha! You Leftards are quite an entertaining, delusional, yet mentally ill bunch!
Report: Is ACORN Intentionally Structured As a Criminal Enterprise? - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

18 Former ACORN Workers Have Been Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud

ttps://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/new-cambridge-analytica-revelations-connect-trump-russia-dots-1250043459593?playlist=associated

There Are 868 Fewer Places to Vote in 2016 Because the Supreme Court Gutted the Voting Rights Act

Is this enough, or do you need more?

Well excuuuuse me! Did you forget about ACORN and all the PROVEN massive voter fraud and suppression that the corrupt, crooked Democratic party and their puppets in the media engage in, every single fuckin' election?

There was no voter fraud with ACORN you stupid fuck.

There were a couple found guilty of voter registration fraud. None of those in question led to ny illegal voting.

You deserve Trump You are both dumber rthan shit.,

NO voter fraud?! Ha ha ha! You Leftards are quite an entertaining, delusional, yet mentally ill bunch!
Report: Is ACORN Intentionally Structured As a Criminal Enterprise? - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

18 Former ACORN Workers Have Been Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud

Sounds like you have been watching too much CNN....

Sounds like you watch too muck Fox/Breitbart.

And why not, even according to Leftard fake news WAPO, FOX is the most trusted national news network, and second most trusted in the world.

New survey shows Fox News more trusted than MSNBC, CNN

Fox News is the most trusted national news channel. And it’s not that close.

Which is why it is continually rated the most watched:
Q1 2018 Ratings: Fox News Remains No. 1 on Cable Television

And now we go back to the regular programming found on most fake news outlefts: The Russians! The Russians!

Dang, they never get, do they?!

Because there are so many of you ignorant Trumpettes & who actually are sofa king stupid that you believeTrump & hisrantson Fake News.

Right, most of the country including some Democrats that trust FOX overwhelmingly over fake news CNN and MSNBC are ignorant and irredeemable. This must be Hillary as posing as RealShmuckDave!

Voter fraud is when actual illegal votes are made. This did not happen.

Voter registration fraud is when you falsify registration forms or illegally not submit them. This is what a couple ACORN members did. They were paid by the number of registrations they turned in & they went tothe phone book. None were used to actually vote.



In your Fox News article, they duped you by using the term election fraud. It worked & iou are wrong.

OK, so the Leftie run ACORN organization gets shut down, and 18 of its members get convicted of ELECTION FRAUD...but Leftards as usual don't see any linkage with voter fraud, and furthermore see nothing wrong with it ethically or morally, or as a reason to have one of their usual faux outrage hair on fire hissy fits. Ha ha ha!

 

[JoeMoma]

Had a Russian official provided the Trump campaign with a video of HRC picking her nose and eating her buggers while she was in Russia, would that be illegal collusion with Russia?

 

[Roudy]

Why did Democrats beg for Russian interference over six times in several US elections, including when Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?

Kennedy-KGB collaboration

5 Times Democrats Tried To Work With The Russians To Swing Elections

Collusion? What About Chinagate and Ted Kennedy's Outreach to the USSR? | RealClearPolitics

Carr: Forget Donald Trump, Teddy Kennedy was Moscow’s bestie

Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?
Fake News.
So why should I believe any the rest of these links?
Hillary's campaign LEGALLY paid for LEGAL opposition research on Trump's business dealings in Russia. That's compared to having a private meeting with the highest ranking members of the Trump campaign and a handful of Russians proposing to "help" Trump win the election.

Likewise, parts of that dossier were clearly unverified, so why should I believe any of it? See how that works?

In a court of LAW, not the court of Liberal Opinion, in order to nullify a document or source all you need to do in prove that one claim or allegation in said document is false or unsubstantiated. Period. Funny thing is Obama and the Dems took this criminally obtained document and used it to SPY on the Trump campaign. And yet, it is the Trump campaign that is the focus of collusion!

Why is it not surprising that the Left is willing to stomp on our constitution, (like it regularly does the flag and the anthem), and engage in fascistic police state tactics?

Where is your proof that the Dems and Obama used this document to spy on the Trump cam paign? I thought the FBI used it to spy on the Russians and Page?

Hah?! You are an idiot, they presented it to to a secret court to obtain FISA warrants to listen in on the Trump campaign, that has been proven true beyond a doubt.

 

[WTP]

Hillary PAID to have a foreign agent smear Donald Trump right before the election and hid what she was doing by going through a "cut out" law firm!
Hillary didn't pay any foreign agents and the information from the dossier was not used during the campaign.

Did the junior Trump use anything from the meeting with the Russian against Hillary in the campaign?

Irrelevant argument. Any attempt to defraud the U.S.in a presidential election with a foreign adversary is a crime. Whether you've got something or not.

Getting true opposition research (dirt) from a foreign source is not necessarily illegal. Having a meeting about the possibility of obtaining opposition research is definitely legal if the meeting turns out to have nothing to do with opposition research once it is held.

This is so unbelievably stupid and wrong. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

You people have got to start educating yourselves. Stop being stupid.

Providing information does not equate to defrauding.

You mean providing the statute that matches the activities of the Trump campaign equates to defrauding. Which is exactly what happened. Get a grip on reality. The Trump tower meeting meets that criteria to a "T".

 

[Roudy]

Had a Russian official provided the Trump campaign with a video of HRC picking her nose and eating her buggers while she was in Russia, would that be illegal collusion with Russia?

According to Leftie logic, yes of course!

 

[JoeMoma]

Did the junior Trump use anything from the meeting with the Russian against Hillary in the campaign?

Irrelevant argument. Any attempt to defraud the U.S.in a presidential election with a foreign adversary is a crime. Whether you've got something or not.

Getting true opposition research (dirt) from a foreign source is not necessarily illegal. Having a meeting about the possibility of obtaining opposition research is definitely legal if the meeting turns out to have nothing to do with opposition research once it is held.

This is so unbelievably stupid and wrong. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

You people have got to start educating yourselves. Stop being stupid.

Providing information does not equate to defrauding.

You mean providing the statute that matches the activities of the Trump campaign equates to defrauding. Which is exactly what happened. Get a grip on reality. The Trump tower meeting meets that criteria to a "T".

No it doesn't.

 

[2aguy]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

 

[WTP]

Why did Democrats beg for Russian interference over six times in several US elections, including when Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?

Kennedy-KGB collaboration

5 Times Democrats Tried To Work With The Russians To Swing Elections

Collusion? What About Chinagate and Ted Kennedy's Outreach to the USSR? | RealClearPolitics

Carr: Forget Donald Trump, Teddy Kennedy was Moscow’s bestie

Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?
Fake News.
So why should I believe any the rest of these links?
Hillary's campaign LEGALLY paid for LEGAL opposition research on Trump's business dealings in Russia. That's compared to having a private meeting with the highest ranking members of the Trump campaign and a handful of Russians proposing to "help" Trump win the election.

Likewise, parts of that dossier were clearly unverified, so why should I believe any of it? See how that works?

In a court of LAW, not the court of Liberal Opinion, in order to nullify a document or source all you need to do in prove that one claim or allegation in said document is false or unsubstantiated. Period. Funny thing is Obama and the Dems took this criminally obtained document and used it to SPY on the Trump campaign. And yet, it is the Trump campaign that is the focus of collusion!

Why is it not surprising that the Left is willing to stomp on our constitution, (like it regularly does the flag and the anthem), and engage in fascistic police state tactics?

Where is your proof that the Dems and Obama used this document to spy on the Trump cam paign? I thought the FBI used it to spy on the Russians and Page?

Hah?! You are an idiot, they presented it to to a secret court to obtain FISA warrants to listen in on the Trump campaign, that has been proven true beyond a doubt.

You seem to be conveniently leaving out the pertinent details. Page was apart of the Trump campaign who was connected to the Russians. Without Page and his ties to Russia, surveillance would not have been possible. The focus was not the Trump campaign. It was Page and the Russians. That is what is true beyond a doubt. So no, it was not about the Trump campaign idiot.

 

[WTP]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

 

[Roudy]

Hillary paid the KJB to create a fake Dossier?
Fake News.
So why should I believe any the rest of these links?
Hillary's campaign LEGALLY paid for LEGAL opposition research on Trump's business dealings in Russia. That's compared to having a private meeting with the highest ranking members of the Trump campaign and a handful of Russians proposing to "help" Trump win the election.

Likewise, parts of that dossier were clearly unverified, so why should I believe any of it? See how that works?

In a court of LAW, not the court of Liberal Opinion, in order to nullify a document or source all you need to do in prove that one claim or allegation in said document is false or unsubstantiated. Period. Funny thing is Obama and the Dems took this criminally obtained document and used it to SPY on the Trump campaign. And yet, it is the Trump campaign that is the focus of collusion!

Why is it not surprising that the Left is willing to stomp on our constitution, (like it regularly does the flag and the anthem), and engage in fascistic police state tactics?

Where is your proof that the Dems and Obama used this document to spy on the Trump cam paign? I thought the FBI used it to spy on the Russians and Page?

Hah?! You are an idiot, they presented it to to a secret court to obtain FISA warrants to listen in on the Trump campaign, that has been proven true beyond a doubt.

You seem to be conveniently leaving out the pertinent details. Page was apart of the Trump campaign who was connected to the Russians. Without Page and his ties to Russia, surveillance would not have been possible. The focus was not the Trump campaign. It was Page and the Russians. That is what is true beyond a doubt. So no, it was not about the Trump campaign idiot.

And Page is so dangerous and such a national security urgency EXCEPTION to violate our constitution, privacy, and foundation of our democracy that he's walking around for over two years, not even arrested or indicted, giving interviews, laughing, joking etc. Or perhaps, he was a deep state / Obama / Hillary criminally concocted conspiracy that provided them with a perfect bullshit excuse to engage in dictatorial style fascistic police state tactics to spy on an opposing candidate and his campaign. But the Left has no real ethics or morals or respect for our laws, constitution or democracy, they just pretend to, which is why they say nothing about it.

 

[Roudy]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

Yes, retard, the FISA warrants clearly show, even thought heavily redacted, that the fake dossier was indeed the main reason the FISA warrants were issued.

 

[WTP]

Likewise, parts of that dossier were clearly unverified, so why should I believe any of it? See how that works?

In a court of LAW, not the court of Liberal Opinion, in order to nullify a document or source all you need to do in prove that one claim or allegation in said document is false or unsubstantiated. Period. Funny thing is Obama and the Dems took this criminally obtained document and used it to SPY on the Trump campaign. And yet, it is the Trump campaign that is the focus of collusion!

Why is it not surprising that the Left is willing to stomp on our constitution, (like it regularly does the flag and the anthem), and engage in fascistic police state tactics?

Where is your proof that the Dems and Obama used this document to spy on the Trump cam paign? I thought the FBI used it to spy on the Russians and Page?

Hah?! You are an idiot, they presented it to to a secret court to obtain FISA warrants to listen in on the Trump campaign, that has been proven true beyond a doubt.

You seem to be conveniently leaving out the pertinent details. Page was apart of the Trump campaign who was connected to the Russians. Without Page and his ties to Russia, surveillance would not have been possible. The focus was not the Trump campaign. It was Page and the Russians. That is what is true beyond a doubt. So no, it was not about the Trump campaign idiot.

And Page is so dangerous and such a national security urgency EXCEPTION to violate our constitution, privacy, and foundation of our democracy that he's walking around, not even arrested or indicted, giving interviews, laughing, joking etc. Or perhaps, he was a deep state / Obama / Hillary criminally concocted conspiracy that provided them with a perfect bullshit excuse to engage in dictatorial style fascistic police state tactics to spy on an opposing candidate and his campaign. But the Left has no real ethics or morals or respect for our laws, constitution or democracy, they just pretend to, which is why they say nothing about it.

Don't you just love how you ignored the part where I proved you wrong about Obama and Dems spying on the Trump campaign, to suddenly switching the conversation about Page's personal characteristics? Lol! You just got had lying about who's spying on who, and had to retreat to Page's personal habits.

Then you had to mop up it up even more by attacking the Left and their morals. Boss, you're as easy as the rest of the liars on here. And you know you got caught. So let's attack someone else. Typical cowards game.

 

[2aguy]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

The pages we have seen so far show they lied to Federal judges, then they blocked out 20 more pages that do even more damage to their lies you stupid asshat.

 

[WTP]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

Yes, retard, the FISA warrants clearly show, even thought heavily redacted, that the fake dossier was indeed the main reason the FISA warrants were issued.

It takes a true retard to accuse someone else of being retarded, when they rely on a document that has twenty pages of redaction's, then call it fake, with zero evidence. Now boss, that takes a true retard right there.

 

[2aguy]

How do you know that? The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

Yes, retard, the FISA warrants clearly show, even thought heavily redacted, that the fake dossier was indeed the main reason the FISA warrants were issued.

It takes a true retard to accuse someone else of being retarded, when they rely on a document that has twenty pages of redaction's, then call it fake, with zero evidence. Now boss, that takes a true retard right there.

Nunez saw the unredacted copies you shitstain.....and he says they are even worse than what we have already seen..... the FBI and Department of Justice used false information to get FISA warrants.... they broke the law.

 

[WTP]

If one reads the actual dossiers...it quickly becomes apparent that almost all of the allegations made in them supposedly come from anonymous contacts in the Russian government...which means none of it can be verified...which is EXACTLY what Steele and the Clinton campaign was looking for! They deliberately set up a smear on Donald Trump and wanted it to break right before the election.

No... it wasn't to smear Trump, it was to have information they could use to get FISA warrants from friendly Federal Judges who they knew wouldn't look closely at the sources of the information.... which is what we know to be true since they in fact, did not look at the sources of the info.

How do you know that?

This is Watergate X a million where you have the FBI and the Department of Justice lying to Federal Judges to get government warrants to spy on Trump ....

The Plumbers worked for the Nixon Campaign, they were not the government itself.

Can you prove the FBI and DOJ were lying?

The FISA warrants show they were lying. And we haven't even seen about 20 pages they redacted to protect their lies...

Ho......ly shit! I can't believe I just read that stupid of an answer. Somebody tell me I didn't actually read that? So, genius, if the FISA warrants show they were lying, and you haven't seen about twenty pages of them, then that means you don't know what's in them. So how in the hell are they lying then?

The pages we have seen so far show they lied to Federal judges, then they blocked out 20 more pages that do even more damage to their lies you stupid asshat.

If they showed they lied, then why haven't you quoted those lies for one, and second, who are the people verifying the authenticity of those lies who are in authority?